SENATE BILL REPORT
ESHB 1151
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As of March 27, 2007
Title: An act relating to animal identification programs.
Brief Description: Creating a livestock identification advisory committee.
Sponsors: House Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Pearson, Kretz, Dunshee, B. Sullivan, Kristiansen, Warnick and Haler).
Brief History: Passed House: 3/12/07, 98-0.
Committee Activity: Agriculture & Rural Economic Development: 3/27/07.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Staff: Bob Lee (786-7404)
Background: Shortly after a cow imported from Canada was determined to have bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or Mad Cow Disease), in 2004, the United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) initiated the National Animal Identification System (NAIS). The system
was intended to enable animal health officials to trace diseased animals back to the herd or
premises that was the source of infection. Several species of livestock were proposed for
inclusion. The NAIS included three phases: premise registration; animal identification; and
animal movement reporting. Originally, the USDA contended that the plan would be mandatory
and requested that states work to implement the plan.
In 2006, the Legislature passed SHB 3033 that required the Washington State Department of
Agriculture (WSDA) to appoint an advisory committee composed of various segments of the
cattle industry. The cattle advisory committee met and produced a report pertaining to
identification of cattle.
During 2006, USDA updated their position to indicate that the NAIS was voluntary for all
species.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill: The WSDA is directed to convene a Livestock
Identification Advisory Committee. The Director (Director) of the WSDA is required to consult
with a broad range of stakeholders who may be impacted by implementation of a mandatory or
voluntary national or state animal identification system, or components of these systems. The
Director must appoint one or more Committee members from:
The Director must also invite one member from an Indian tribe to join the Committee. The
Committee will be chaired by the Director or the Director's designee, and be staffed by the
WSDA.
In conjunction with the WSDA, the Committee must:
The WSDA, in conjunction with the Committee, must submit a written report of its findings and
recommendations to appropriate committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2008.
This section expires June 30, 2008.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: There are concerns about the original NAIS
program that called for mandatory identification of all livestock and the impacts that such a
system would have, particularly on owners of a small number of livestock. The WSDA has
received funds from the federal government. Thus, the WSDA cannot be looked to as being
impartial and should not be in charge of this committee. Instead, it should be convened by the
Legislature.
CON: The assignment in the legislation is a large daunting task with little time. The original
purpose of NAIS was to improve trace back for high risk commercial livestock operations, not
to people who participate in trail rides and youth shows. There has been a lot of misinformation
and the federal government could have handled the issue better. Commercial livestock producers
have built their farms over generations and are vulnerable to disease outbreaks like those
experienced in England with hoof and mouth disease, where 1.6 million animals were destroyed.
The commercial livestock industry realizes that the brand system does not produce information
fast enough to address disease trace back needs in a timely fashion. The commercial cattle
industry has been working with the WSDA on improving the existing system, and supports the
WSDA and the State Veterinarian.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Celeste Bishop, Carol Osterman, Valerie Tinney, No NAIS
Washington.
CON: Mary Beth Lang, WSDA; Jim Jesernig, Agri-Beef; Jay Gordon, Washington State Dairy
Federation; Eddie Armstrong, Washington State Horse Council; Jack Field, Washington
Cattlemen's Association; and Ed Field, Washington Cattle Feeders Association.