SENATE BILL REPORT
ESHB 2191
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Judiciary, March 30, 2007
Title: An act relating to limiting deferred prosecution in domestic violence cases.
Brief Description: Limiting deferred prosecution in domestic violence cases.
Sponsors: House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Lantz, Warnick, Pedersen, Williams, Moeller, Seaquist, Morrell, Kelley, Simpson and Ormsby).
Brief History: Passed House: 3/12/07, 98-0.
Committee Activity: Judiciary: 3/28/07, 3/30/07 [DP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Kline, Chair; Tom, Vice Chair; McCaslin, Ranking Minority Member; Carrell, Hargrove, Murray, Roach and Weinstein.
Staff: Dawn Noel (786-7472)
Background: Deferred prosecution: A person charged with any misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense in a court of limited jurisdiction may be eligible for deferred prosecution. To be eligible, a person charged with an offense (other than a criminal mistreatment offense) must:
The petitioner must be evaluated by an approved treatment facility, which will submit a treatment
plan to the court.
For a person charged with a criminal mistreatment of a dependent person by withholding the basic
necessities of life, the person charged must allege that he or she is the parent of the victim, that
the wrongful conduct is a result of parenting problems for which the petitioner is in need of child
welfare services to improve his or her parenting skills, that the petitioner wants to correct his or
her conduct to reduce the likelihood of harm to his or her minor children, that in the absence of
such services the petitioner may be unable to reduce the likelihood of such harm, that the
petitioner has cooperated with the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) to develop
a plan to receive appropriate child welfare services, and that he or she will pay for such services
if financially able to do so. The petition must also contain a case history and service plan by
DSHS. Additionally, the petitioner must stipulate to the sufficiency and admissibility of facts,
acknowledge such admissibility in any trial on the charged offense, and waive the right to testify,
to have a speedy trial, to call witnesses, to present evidence, and to have a jury trial.
If the court approves the plan and grants a deferred prosecution, the person will be ordered to
undergo treatment in a two-year program. If a person fails to successfully complete the treatment
program, the court must hold a hearing to determine whether to remove the person from the
deferred prosecution and enter judgment on the charge. If the person successfully completes the
program, the court must dismiss the charges three years after the successful completion of the
program.
Persons charged with a traffic offense or criminal mistreatment are not eligible for a deferred
prosecution more than once.
Domestic Violence: The statutes addressing domestic violence provide a non-exclusive list of
offenses that, when committed by one family or household member against another, are
considered domestic violence. Some of the crimes, such as fourth-degree assault, criminal
trespass, coercion, and third-degree malicious mischief, are misdemeanors and gross
misdemeanors.
Domestic violence perpetrator treatment programs must meet minimum requirements established
by DSHS. Perpetrator treatment programs must focus primarily on ending the violence and
holding the perpetrator accountable.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute House Bill: A person charged with a misdemeanor or gross
misdemeanor that would be considered domestic violence must not be eligible for deferred
prosecution more than once.
The petitioner must state under oath that the petitioner: (1) is the family or household member
of the victim; (2) is in need of domestic violence perpetrator treatment; (3) wants to correct his
or her conduct to reduce the likelihood of harm to family or household members; (4) believes
that unless treatment is received, the probability of future recurrence is great; and (5) agrees to
pay for the cost of diagnosis and treatment, if financially able. The petition must also contain a
case history and written assessment prepared by an approved domestic violence perpetrator
treatment program provider.
However, the petitioner must allege the need for counseling or other services, rather than
perpetrator treatment, if: (1) petitioner is not the primary perpetrator based on the comparative
extent of injuries inflicted or threats creating fear of physical injury or the history of domestic
violence between the persons involved (as indicated in the case history and written assessment);
or (2) the victim is not or was not a spouse of the petitioner, parent of petitioner's child, or person
who has or had a dating relationship with the petitioner.
The statute does not limit a prosecutor's ability to negotiate alternative dispositions.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill came from a committee in my
community, which is unfortunately ground zero for domestic violence. It is the scene of the
terrible tragedy where the Tacoma chief of police murdered his wife and killed himself in a rage
of domestic violence. Out of that has arisen a committee that does amazing work on how to
identify potential domestic violence settings. The committee has suggested a bill which limits
deferred prosecution for domestic violence to one time. If someone somehow manages to have
that charge and works it through with the discretion of both the bench and the prosecutor, that
person's prosecution can be deferred during treatment. That is fine for once, but twice, no. At
that point, the person has a real problem, and needs to deal with it in the usual stiff penalty way.
CON: The cases I see are usually minor domestic violence cases of the lowest level. They often
involve heightened stress situations where people are getting divorced. The problem with the
substitute bill is that it creates two classes of people. We shouldn't have a situation in which
we're treating people differently for the same event. It has to do with the fact that some domestic
violence advocates want to treat women victims differently. We should have one system in which
we have everyone get some kind of counseling or treatment. We shouldn't mandate that everyone
enter a state-certified domestic violence perpetrator program. It's like treating a sinus infection
with chemotherapy. We should let the people choose the provider they want. If he or she comes
back, throw the book at them, but otherwise let them choose.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Representative Lantz, prime sponsor.
CON: Lisa Scott, Taking Action Against Bias in the System.