SENATE BILL REPORT
EHB 2476
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Judiciary, February 29, 2008
Title: An act relating to authorizing tribal police officers to act as general authority Washington state peace officers.
Brief Description: Authorizing tribal police officers to act as general authority Washington state peace officers.
Sponsors: Representatives McCoy, Simpson, Lantz, Appleton, O'Brien, Kenney, Sells, Moeller, Hudgins, Dunn, Upthegrove and Chase.
Brief History: Passed House: 2/18/08, 58-37.
Committee Activity: Judiciary: 2/22/08, 2/29/08 [DPA].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass as amended.Signed by Senators Kline, Chair; Tom, Vice Chair; Carrell, Hargrove, McDermott and Weinstein.
Staff: Robert Kay (786-7405)
Background: Definitions.
1) with the prior written consent of the sheriff or chief of police in whose primary territorial
jurisdiction the exercise of the powers occurs;
2) in response to an emergency involving immediate threat to human life or property;
3) in response to a request for assistance pursuant to a mutual law enforcement assistance
agreement;
4) in response to the request of a peace officer with enforcement authority;
5) when transporting prisoners;
6) when executing an arrest warrant or search warrant; or
7) when in fresh pursuit.
Tribal Police Officer Certification. In 2006 the Legislature passed a law allowing tribal police
officers to voluntarily obtain Washington police officer certification through the state's CJTC.
Indian tribal officers making this certification must meet the same statutory requirements as for
Washington peace officers, including basic law enforcement training at the CJTC Academy and
submitting to a psychological evaluation, a polygraph, and a criminal background check. An
application by a tribal law enforcement officer for tribal police officer certification is processed
in the same manner as any application by a Washington peace officer for peace officer
certification.
Interlocal Agreement. To participate in the tribal officer certification program, tribal governments
must enter into a written interlocal agreement with the CJTC. The written agreement must
provide that the tribal law enforcement agency employing the tribal officer applying for
certification will:
1) release all necessary personnel records and background information to allow the CJTC
to assess the tribal officer's performance before and after certification; and
2) report to the CJTC:
i) commission of a felony by the tribal officer;
ii) discharge of the tribal officer due to:
a) conviction of:
any other crime the conviction of which disqualifies a Washington citizen
from the legal right to possess a firearm under state or federal law;
b) conduct that would constitute any of the crimes addressed in (a); or
c) knowingly making materially false statements during disciplinary investigations,
where the false statements are the sole basis for the termination;
iii) interference by the tribal officer with an investigation by the CJTC regarding denial
or revocation of a certificate by:
a) knowingly making a materially false statement to the commission; or
b) in any matter under investigation by the CJTC, tampering with evidence or
intimidating any witness; or
iv) termination of the tribal officer by the tribal police department for any reason.
Summary of Bill (Recommended Amendments): Tribal police officers are authorized to act
as general authority Washington peace officers when the appropriate sovereign tribal nation meets
specified requirements regarding certification, insurance liability, administration, and either: (1)
enters into an interlocal agreement with the appropriate local government; or (2) failing such an
agreement, submits to binding arbitration with the local government in order to reach such an
agreement. The appropriate tribal government must submit proof of: (1) a tribal officer's
required certification; (2) liability insurance to cover tortuous conduct of tribal officers; and (3)
a waiver of the defense of sovereign immunity by the tribal nation and its insurance companies
to the Office of Financial Management (OFM) for review and verification. Only when this
information has been provided to OFM are the tribal police officers authorized to act as general
authority Washington State Peace Officers. The CJTC must notify the OFM: (1) if a tribal police
officer authorized to act as a general authority Washington peace officer has been decertified
pursuant to RCW 43.101.157; or (2) if the sovereign tribal government of a certified tribal officer
is otherwise out of compliance with RCW 43.101.157.
The general authority police power can be exercised only within the boundaries of the primary
jurisdiction of a certified Washington peace officer, except in the circumstances listed under the
definition of general authority police power above. In the case of a certified peace officer from
a tribal police department, the primary jurisdiction is within the exterior boundaries of the
reservation lands.
Certification. For a tribal police officer to be authorized as a general authority Washington peace
officer, the tribal police officer must be certified pursuant to statute. As noted above, since 2006,
before a tribal police officer can be certified, the appropriate tribal law enforcement agency must
enter into a written inter-local agreement with the CJTC regarding release of information about,
any disqualifying conduct by, and any disciplinary discharge or termination for any reason of the
tribal officer. That requirement is not changed. According to the CJTC, the intent of this
requirement is to put the same burden of release of information and reporting on the tribal
government as on municipal and county police departments.
Insurance Liability. Tribal governments must carry liability insurance and they and their
insurance companies must waive a sovereign immunity defense to the extent of such coverage
so as to allow a civil action for damages in the event a tribal police officer acting in the capacity
of a state peace officer commits a tort. The OFM will have discretion to determine the adequacy
of coverage based on its own risk management analysis.
Interlocal Citation Procedure. Authorized tribal police officers acting in the capacity of a general
authority Washington peace officer must submit copies of any citation, notice of infraction, or any
incident report to the appropriate local police chief or sheriff within three days. Any citation must
be to Washington courts, except that any Indian cited within the boundaries of the reservation
may be cited to tribal court. Any citation that does not follow these requirements is unenforceable.
Interlocal Agreement with Appropriate Local Government. Another requirement for
commissioning of certified tribal officers as general authority Washington peace officers is entry
by the sovereign tribal nation into an interlocal agreement with the appropriate local government
in the context of the concurrent jurisdiction of the tribal nation and the local government on the
tribal reservation. If the tribal nation and the local government reach such an agreement, and the
tribal nation and certified tribal officers have met all the other requirements of the act, then the
certified tribal officers are by law commissioned as general authority peace officers.
Binding Arbitration. If the tribal nation and the appropriate local government are unable to reach
an interlocal operations agreement by June 1, 2009, the parties are required by the act to enter
binding arbitration. Each party must select an arbitrator, and the two arbitrators selected by the
parties must agree on a third arbitrator. After submission by the parties of their respective best
offers, the three-person arbitration panel must select the offer that best implements the provisions
of the act.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY JUDICIARY COMMITTEE (Recommended
Amendments): Both the sovereign tribal nation and its insurance companies must waive the
defense of sovereign immunity to allow a civil tort action for damages. For purposes of civil
liability, a tribal police officer is not an employee of either the state or any local government.
Neither the state nor any local government must be liable for the tortious conduct of a tribal police
officer.
In order for certified tribal officers to be commissioned as general authority Washington peace
officers, the appropriate sovereign tribal nation, and appropriate local government must enter into
an interlocal agreement. Upon entering into such an agreement, if all other requirements have
been met by the tribal nation and its certified tribal police officers, those officers are
commissioned by law as general authority Washington peace officers.
If the appropriate sovereign tribal nation and local government are unable to reach an agreement
by June 1, 2009, the tribal nation and the local government must enter into binding arbitration to
reach an agreement.
The effective date of the act for any sovereign tribal nation meeting all the requirements of the
act, including the requirement of an interlocal agreement with the appropriate local government,
is immediately upon meeting the requirements, or June 1, 2009, whichever is earlier.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Engrossed Bill: PRO: An Amnesty International
report alleges that Indians are suffering a lack of protection from law enforcement under the
present system. Indians suffer as victims of violent crime at a rate 2.5 times the national average.
Between 1976 and 1999, Indians on average were 1.6 percent of the state's population, but were
4 percent of the murder victims in the state. Depending on the type of violent crime, non-Indians
are the perpetrators of violent crime against Indians in from 60 to 90 percent of the cases. Yet,
tribal police officers cannot investigate and arrest non-Indian perpetrators of these crimes on the
reservation. When a serious felony committed by a non-Indian on the reservation occurs and a
suspect is detained by a tribal police officer, the tribal officer is forced to wait for the arrival of
a sheriff's deputy, and consequently, the tribal police officer is then unavailable to respond to
other calls for service on the reservation. This practice of calling local non-Indian law
enforcement agencies to arrest and investigate crimes committed by non-Indians on the
reservation has been in place now for 30 years, and it does not work.
Six out of the 29 Indian tribes in Washington have tribal police departments whose roster of
officers, including supervisory staff, are ready and willing to be certified and commissioned as
general authority Washington police officers. These police departments have standard 14-week
field training programs for their officers. Tribal police departments who have officers certified
and commissioned under this bill will have supervisory personnel and field training officers who
are also certified and commissioned who can accomplish effective field training. This bill does
not contain a requirement that the whole roster of officers in any tribal police department must
be certified and commissioned because for smaller tribes such a requirement would act as a
barrier in bringing their police departments up to the standards maintained by the Criminal Justice
Training Commission. This bill will allow some flexibility to smaller tribes.
Four other states have implemented similar legislation, and the outcomes have been uniformly
positive. A study by the International Association of Police Chiefs and the Department of Justice
showed no increase in tort claims against county sheriff's departments after commissioning of
certified tribal officers as general authority police officers. Another study by the National
Conference of State Legislatures of states which have passed similar legislation showed increased
cooperation between tribal and county and municipal police departments, and an average savings
by sheriff's departments in counties adjacent to reservations of $50,000 in law enforcement costs.
The tribes have worked with the Office of Financial Management to demonstrate their
commitment to retaining adequate liability insurance and effectively to waiving the defense of
immunity for torts committed by Indian police against non-Indians.
CON: This bill allows tribal officers coming into contact with non-Indians on the reservation to
be unaccountable to those non-Indians for any misconduct, because the non-Indians have no way
to vote the tribal chief out of office, as they could a sheriff. It is not clear that the waiver by the
tribe of sovereign immunity regarding tort liability to non-Indians will be effective. The county
police departments in counties adjacent to the reservations should have a right of first refusal to
take responsibility for the investigation or arrest of a non-Indian on tribal land. The present
system already allows for tribal officers to be specially commissioned by the county sheriff to act
as general authority county sheriff's deputies. There are tribal members on reservations who are
against the assumption by their tribe's police officers of general authority police powers, but these
tribal members are afraid to speak out for fear of retribution by their tribal governments.
This bill should include a provision whereby all of the officers in a tribal police department must
be commissioned, as is the requirement for county and municipal police departments in this state.
This bill would allow a junior officer to be certified and commissioned, while allowing senior
supervisory officers to remain uncertified and uncommissioned. Under this bill, it will not
necessarily be the case that tribal police departments will do adequate field training.
Under this bill tribal officers will be able to arrest and investigate major crimes committed by
non-Indians on tribal land, when they are not allowed to do so by the federal government under
the Major Crimes Act when such a major crime is committed by an Indian on tribal land. The
FBI handles such cases where an Indian is the suspect.
The Legislature should not pass this bill this session to allow for more time to work out the
problems with the bill.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Chief Mike Lasnier, Suquamish Tribal Police Department, NW
Association of Tribal Law Enforcement Officers; Chief Scott Smith, Tulalip Police Department,
Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs; Michael Taylor, Attorney, Tulalip Tribes.
CON: Sheriff Ken Irwin, Yakima County Sheriff's Department; Sheriff Dan Kimball, Thurston
County Sheriff's Department; Thomas J. Mitchell, Marysville/Tulalip Community Association;
Philip Brendale, citizen.