SENATE BILL REPORT
SHB 2496
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Labor, Commerce, Research & Development, February 25, 2008
Title: An act relating to enhancing the mobility of certified public accountants.
Brief Description: Enhancing the mobility of certified public accountants.
Sponsors: House Committee on Commerce & Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Conway, Williams, Condotta, Moeller, Chandler, Green, Hurst, Wood, McIntire, Kenney and Chase).
Brief History: Passed House: 2/13/08, 97-0.
Committee Activity: Labor, Commerce, Research & Development: 2/25/08 [DP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR, COMMERCE, RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Kohl-Welles, Chair; Keiser, Vice Chair; Holmquist, Ranking Minority Member; Franklin, Hewitt, King, Murray and Prentice.
Staff: Ingrid Mungia (786-7423)
Background: The Public Accountancy Act (Act) governs the practice of accounting in the state.
Under the Act, both accountants and accounting firms must be licensed to hold themselves out
as "certified public accountants" or "CPAs." The Board of Accountancy (Board) adopts rules,
conducts investigations, and otherwise administers the Act.
Accountants and accounting firms perform various services which, depending on the service,
must meet certain professional standards. The Board conducts a quality assurance review (QAR)
program to review the work of licensees.
An individual whose principal place of business is outside Washington may obtain a practice
privilege to practice without a Washington license if the person meets "substantial equivalency"
requirements. The individual must either: 1) be licensed in a state whose entry requirements are
substantially equivalent to Washington's requirements; or 2) as an individual, have the entry
requirements that are substantially equivalent to Washington's requirements. To have the practice
privilege, qualifying persons must notify the Board of their intent to enter the state and pay a fee.
By rule, the Board interprets the notice and fee requirements to apply to individuals who spend
more than 10 percent of their total work hours on activities conducted within the state, or who
conduct other specified activities in the state.
Out-of-state sole practitioner CPAs who have a practice privilege may perform all accounting
work. Other practitioners who do specified work may do so only if the firm has a Washington
license.
As a condition of exercising the practice privilege, an out-of-state CPA consents to the personal
and subject matter jurisdiction of the Board and to the appointment of the CPA's home state
board as the agent for service of process. If a board in another state makes a complaint, the
Washington Board has authority to investigate.
Summary of Bill: The notice and fee requirements for the exercise of practice privileges by
out-of-state CPAs are eliminated. The consent to jurisdiction for the practice privilege is
broadened so that the firm, in addition to the individual, consents to personal and subject matter
jurisdiction and both the firm and the individual consent to the disciplinary authority of the Board.
In addition, if the individual's license from the other state is no longer valid, the individual agrees
to stop practicing in Washington. The practice privilege and consent no longer apply only to
CPAs who enter the state.
The types of services that may be performed by individuals with practice privileges are modified.
If certain attest services are performed by an individual with practice privileges for an entity with
its home office in Washington, the firm must have a Washington license. These services are
audits and examinations of prospective financial information performed in accordance with
specified standards and any engagement to be performed in accordance with certain federal
standards. Other services may be performed by an individual with practice privileges if the firm
has a Washington license. These services are reviews of financial statements and compilations,
in accordance with specified standards.
The criteria for substantial equivalency are specified. A substantially equivalent state is one that
requires: (1) at least 150 semester hours of college or university education, including a degree;
(2) a passing grade on the uniform CPA exam; and (3) at least one year of experience. The Board
may exempt an individual from the education requirement if the individual held a valid license
before January 1, 2012.
A provision allowing the Board to exempt individuals with practice privileges from continuing
education requirements is deleted as is a provision allowing the Board to accept a national
organization's designation of substantial equivalency.
The Board's relationship with other boards is changed. The Board must investigate any complaint
made by a board and must also cooperate with the other boards, including boards in other
jurisdictions beyond the defined states.
New definitions are provided in statute. These include definitions of "attest" and "compilation."
The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) is a "state" for purposes of
out-of-state practice privileges when the Board determines CNMI's standards are substantially
equivalent to Washington standards.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: None.
Persons Testifying: No one.