SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5075
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Water, Energy & Telecommunications, February 28, 2007
Title: An act relating to outdoor burning.
Brief Description: Authorizing outdoor burning within an urban growth area to protect life or property from a fire hazard.
Sponsors: Senators Honeyford, Rasmussen, Hewitt, Clements, Schoesler, Roach and Parlette.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Water, Energy & Telecommunications: 2/02/07, 2/28/07 [DPS, w/oRec].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WATER, ENERGY & TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5075 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Honeyford, Ranking Minority Member; Delvin, Fraser, Holmquist, Marr, Morton and Regala.
Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.Signed by Senator Oemig.
Staff: Scott Boettcher (786-7416)
Background: Outdoor burning is burning of household yard waste, such as leaves, grass, brush
and other yard trimmings. It is also burning to clear land of trees, stumps, shrubbery, or other
natural vegetation. Currently, outdoor burning is prohibited in all urban growth areas of the state.
However, certain types of burning are allowed within urban growth areas, as permitted by the
Departments of Natural Resources and Ecology or the regional Air Pollution Control Agency to
manage storm or flood related debris, or for ongoing agricultural activities where outdoor burning
is a normal, necessary and customary activity. These activities are not allowed during air quality
episodes.
Summary of Bill: Outdoor burning of cut brush or timber is allowed within an urban growth area, except during an air quality episode or when there has been a determination of impaired air quality. The local fire official must determine that burning is an appropriate method to protect life or property from a fire hazard.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY RECOMMENDED SUBSTITUTE AS PASSED
COMMITTEE (Water, Energy & Telecommunications): Outdoor burning is allowed within
an urban growth area in rural counties to protect life or property from a fire hazard as determined
by a federal, state, or local fire official, unless the area is in nonattainment or maintenance for
federal air quality standards, there is an air quality episode, or alternative disposal methods are
available at a reasonable cost.
If burning is determined appropriate, the burn permitting entity must issue a permit, but may
require fire containment and weather related restrictions.
Local fire districts making a fire hazard determination or issuing burn permits may charge a fee
of up to $35. Other entities issuing a site specific burning permit may collect a fee not to exceed
five dollars.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: We need the ability to protect homes in small
communities within the urban growth area from forest fires. Forest fires are costly and create
terrible air quality issues.
OTHER: Air pollution has an adverse effect on people's health. People with asthma, and heart
and lung disease are at increased risk from poor air quality. Protecting people's homes is an
important issue. This bill is overly broad and could allow burning in large cities, potentially
exposing many people to the harmful effects of smoke. It allows blanket permission instead of
individual permits and it is silent on permit conditions and issuances.
Cities with populations less than 5,000 are no longer permitted to burn outdoors. We need to
identify small communities to allow them to burn when there are no other cost effective
alternatives. It is important to find viable cost effective alternatives. Until then, allow outdoor
burning through best management practices. These best management practices should be
reviewed and overseen by the Department of Ecology for use until cost effective alternatives are
found.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Honeyford, prime sponsor; Paul Pearce, Skamania County
Commissioner.
OTHER: Rob Duff, Department of Health; Marshall Taylor, Department of Ecology; Richard
Stedman, Olympic Regional Clean Air Agency; Marcia Fromhold, Puget Sound Clean Air
Agency; Eric Johnson, Washington Association Counties; Dave Williams, Association of
Washington Cities; Steve Jenkins, Mayor of Bridgeport; Ron Draggoo, Douglas County Solid
Waste.