FINAL BILL REPORT
SSB 5089
C 6 L 07
Synopsis as Enacted
Brief Description: Conforming Washington's tax structure to the streamlined sales and use tax agreement.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Regala, Zarelli, Eide, Shin, Franklin, Keiser, Rockefeller, Weinstein, Pridemore, Marr, Hobbs, Rasmussen, Murray, Prentice, Fairley, Fraser, Spanel, Berkey, Tom, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe and Kline; by request of Governor Gregoire).
Senate Committee on Ways & Means
House Committee on Finance
Background: Washington and 45 other states impose retail sales and use taxes. These taxes are
imposed on the retail sale or use of most items of tangible personal property and some services.
The rates, definitions, and administrative provisions relating to sales and use taxes vary greatly
among the 7,500 state and local taxing jurisdictions. This variety is one reason cited in Quill v.
North Dakota, 112 S.Ct. 1904 (1992), where the United States Supreme Court held that the
federal commerce clause prohibits a state from requiring mail-order, and by extension internet,
firms to collect sales tax unless they have a physical presence in the state.
An effort was started in early 2000, by the Federation of Tax Administrators, the Multistate Tax
Commission, the National Conference of State Legislatures, and the National Governors
Association, to simplify and modernize sales and use tax collection and administration nation-wide. The effort is known as the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP).
In the 2002 Legislative Session, the Legislature adopted the Simplified Sales and Use Tax
Administration Act, which authorized the Department of Revenue (DOR) to be a voting member
in the SSTP. Many other states have also authorized such participation, and representatives have
met to develop an agreement to govern the implementation of the SSTP. This agreement, called
the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA), was adopted by 34 states and
Washington, D.C., in November 2002.
During the 2003 Legislative Session, the Legislature enacted legislation at the request of the DOR
to implement the uniform definitions and administrative provisions of the SSUTA. However,
the legislation did not implement several provisions that are necessary for the state to conform
fully to the SSUTA, including a provision that would require the state to change its local sales
and use tax sourcing rules.
Under the sales and use tax laws in Washington, local sales and use taxes are sourced on an origin
based system according to the following rules:
On October 1, 2005, the SSUTA went into effect with 13 full members of the agreement. To date, there are 15 full members of the SSUTA and six associate members. Full members are those states that have fully complied with the agreement and associate members are those states that are expected to comply by January 1, 2008.
Summary: Provisions are included that would allow the state to conform fully to the SSUTA.
Monetary Allowances and Vendor Compensation: DOR is required to adopt rules providing for
monetary allowances for sellers who use certified service providers, tax compliance software, or
another means of collecting and remitting tax that is authorized under the SSUTA. In addition,
DOR may adopt rules to provide vendor compensation for sellers who collect and remit sales and
use taxes to the state; but, this authority is contingent upon action by Congress or the courts that
would allow states to require remote sellers to collect sales or use taxes. Monetary allowances
and vendor compensation must be funded only from state sales and use taxes.
Amnesty: DOR is prohibited from making assessments for past uncollected sales and use taxes
against an unregistered seller who, within 12 months of the effective date of the state's
membership in the SSUTA, registers under the agreement and then collects and remits sales and
use taxes to the state for a period of at least 36 months. This amnesty does not apply if the seller
has already received an audit notice from DOR, with respect to sales and use taxes collected but
not remitted by a seller, or with respect to sales or use taxes that are the seller's liability in its
capacity as a buyer or consumer.
Sourcing: The sales and use tax sourcing rules are changed to a destination based system and
become effective July 1, 2008. The rules provide:
1) If a good or service is received by the purchaser at the business location of the seller, the
sales tax is sourced to that business location.
2) If the good is not received by the purchaser at the business location of the seller, the sales
tax is sourced to the location where receipt occurs, if known by the seller.
3) If neither of the first two rules apply, the sales tax is sourced to the address indicated for
the purchaser in records normally maintained by the seller, if the use of this address by
the seller does not constitute bad faith.
4) If none of the first three rules apply, the sales tax is sourced to the address for the
purchaser obtained during the consummation of the sale, including the address of the
purchaser's payment instrument, if the use of this address by the seller does not constitute
bad faith. and
5) If none of the first four rules apply, the sales tax is sourced to the address from which
delivery is made.
The general sourcing rules do not apply to purchases of motor vehicles, aircrafts, watercrafts,
modular homes, manufactured homes, and mobile homes. In such purchases, the tax is sourced
to the location from which delivery was made.
Mitigation: The streamline sales and use tax mitigation account is created to mitigate the effect
of the change in sourcing rules to negatively impacted local jurisdictions. On July 1, 2008, the
State Treasurer must transfer $31.6 million into the account from the General Fund. Each July
1 thereafter, the Treasurer must transfer an amount determined by the DOR to fully mitigate
negatively impacted local jurisdictions. Mitigation for the first year will be determined by DOR
from tax reporting data to determine actual losses less gains from voluntarily registered sellers.
Beginning December 31, 2008, distributions from the account will be made quarterly. After the
first year, DOR will determine each local jurisdiction's annual losses. Distributions will be made
quarterly representing one-fourth of a jurisdiction's annual loss less voluntary compliance revenue
from the previous quarter.
DOR must convene an oversight committee comprised of positively and negatively impacted
local jurisdictions to assist in determining losses to be mitigated.
Public facility districts whose tax revenue is taken as a credit against the state sales tax may raise
their tax up to .004 percent if their revenues have been reduced at least 0.5 percent. The district
may only raise its tax by the least amount necessary to mitigate the reduction in sales and use tax
collections.
Confidentiality: Protections are provided with respect to confidentiality and privacy for
businesses that use certified service providers under the SSUTA. Certified service providers are
required to perform tax calculations, remittance, and reporting functions and may not retain the
personally identifiable information of consumers, with very limited exceptions. Personally
identifiable information will not be retained any longer than required to ensure the validity of
exemptions.
DOR is required to complete a taxability matrix and will provide notice of changes in the
taxability of products or services listed in the matrix. Sellers and certified service providers are
relieved from liability to the state and to local jurisdictions for having charged or collected the
incorrect amount of sales or use tax if the error resulted from reliance on erroneous information
provided by DOR in the matrix.
Definitions: The taxability of delivery charges is changed to allow sellers to apportion their
delivery charges between taxable and nontaxable property within a shipment, and to apply tax to
only the portion that represents delivery charges for taxable property.
Several telecommunication definitions recently incorporated into the SSUTA are adopted. These
are changes to terminology in current law, but do not change current law regarding taxability and
exemptions.
The current sales tax exemption for prosthetic devices is extended to the component parts of
prosthetic devices to conform with the SSUTA definition. For nebulizers, a device that converts
liquid medication into a mist to be inhaled, a process is created for purchasers to receive a refund
of sales and use tax paid. These items are currently exempt from sales and use tax in Washington.
"Bundled transactions" are defined as the retail sale of two or more products where the products
are distinct and identifiable and the products are sold for one non-itemized price. Excluded from
the definition are:
Bundled transactions are subject to sales and use tax.
Small Business Relief: Small retailers are defined as having less than $500,000 in gross income,
at least 5 percent of their income derived from deliveries away from their place of business, and
at least 1 percent of their income from deliveries to destinations other than to the ones they report
the most local sales tax to. Small retailers are relieved of penalty and interest from errors due to
the sourcing changes. In addition, relief is provided for small retailers to allow them to either:
Administration: Sellers are authorized to designate an agent to register the seller with the state.
Sellers who agree to collect and remit sales and use taxes under the SSUTA must register through
an on-line system authorized under the SSUTA.
Sellers registered under SSUTA are required to use DOR's address-based GIS system to
determine the correct rate and jurisdiction for local sales and use tax. Sellers who use the system
are held harmless from errors resulting from proper use of the system.
References are removed to the multiple points of use provisions from the sales tax sourcing
section. Technical corrections were made to the telecommunicaton provisions. The small
business relief provisions were modified to have the certified service provider fee established by
rule rather than a schedule in state. A business and occupation tax credit was also added in
addition to the sales tax credit for small businesses.
Votes on Final Passage:
Senate 45 3
House 76 15
Effective: July 22, 2007 (Sections 301, 1301, 1602, and 1701-1703)
July 1, 2008
Contingent (Sections 302, 1003, 1006, 1014, and 1018)