SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5097
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Early Learning & K-12 Education, February 1, 2007
Ways & Means, March 5, 2007
Title: An act relating to safe school plans.
Brief Description: Changing requirements for safe school plans.
Sponsors: Senators Rockefeller, McAuliffe, Swecker, Kastama, Regala, Weinstein, Eide, Oemig, Pridemore, Kohl-Welles, Keiser, Shin, Berkey, Murray, Kline and Rasmussen.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Early Learning & K-12 Education: 1/22/07, 2/01/07 [DP-WM, DNP].
Ways & Means: 2/12/07, 3/05/07 [DPS].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON EARLY LEARNING & K-12 EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators McAuliffe, Chair; Tom, Vice Chair; Clements, Eide, Hewitt, Hobbs, Kauffman, Oemig, Rasmussen, Weinstein and Zarelli.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senators Holmquist, Ranking Minority Member and Brandland.
Staff: Kimberly Cushing (786-7421)
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5097 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Prentice, Chair; Fraser, Vice Chair, Capital Budget Chair; Pridemore, Vice Chair, Operating Budget; Zarelli, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Carrell, Fairley, Hatfield, Hewitt, Hobbs, Honeyford, Keiser, Kohl-Welles, Oemig, Parlette, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schoesler and Tom.
Staff: Bryon Moore (786-7726)
Background: Under current law, the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) must establish
timelines for school districts to develop individual comprehensive safe school plans. School
districts are required to report progress on their comprehensive safe school plans to SPI on a
periodic but undefined basis. SPI is given authority to adopt rules for implementation.
The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) is required to create and
operate a statewide first responder building and mapping information system. Beginning in 2003,
the Washington Legislature has provided funding through WASPC to map and assess the security
of schools in Washington.
In 2003, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 called for the establishment of a single,
comprehensive National Incident Management System (NIMS). Federal preparedness assistance
funding for state and local governments is dependent on NIMS compliance. A school district is
considered local government. One of the NIMS implementation requirements is to use the
Incident Command System (ICS), which provides a common organizational structure for the
immediate response to emergencies and coordination of personnel and equipment at the site of
an incident. Currently, the Association of Washington School Principals, the Washington
Emergency Management Division (EMD), and SPI are providing NIMS and ICS training to
school administrators.
Summary of Bill: Schools and school districts are required to adopt, by September 1, 2008, and
implement a safe school plan, consistent with the school mapping information system. Each plan
must include required school safety policies and procedures; address emergency mitigation,
preparedness, response, and recovery; include provisions for assisting and communicating with
students and staff; comply with training guidance provided by EMD; require the building
principal to be ICS certified; consider how schools can be used in the event of a community-wide
emergency; and set guidelines for requesting local emergency management agencies to meet with
school districts annually.
School districts are required to annually update their safe school plans; inventory hazardous
materials; update the school mapping information system, which includes identifying staff
members trained on NIMS or ICS and identifying school transportation emergency procedures;
inventory emergency supplies; and provide information to all staff on the use of emergency
supplies and alert procedures. This information must be reported to WASPC.
Schools are required to conduct no less than one safety-related drill each month, which includes
a drill using the school mapping information system, a drill for lockdowns, and a drill for
shelter-in-place. Schools should also consider drills for earthquakes, tsunamis, or other high-risk
local events. Such drills should be documented.
Educational service districts are encouraged to apply to federal emergency response and crisis
management grants with the assistance of SPI and EMD.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY RECOMMENDED SUBSTITUTE AS PASSED COMMITTEE (Ways & Means): A new school districts grant program is created that will be administered by the Educational Service Districts for the development and updating of comprehensive safe plans, school safety training, and the conducting safety-related drills. School transportation procedures and related planning for evacuation are added to the information that school districts are required to update in the school mapping information system. Requirements for school districts to annually inventory and replenish emergency supplies are eliminated. School districts are encouraged to work with emergency management agencies to conduct one tabletop exercise, one functional exercise, and two full-scale exercises within a four-year period. Schools are also required to conduct six drills for fire evacuation. Language is added that states the required safety-related drills are intended to satisfy all federal requirements for comprehensive school emergency drills and evacuations. A task force on gangs in schools is created to examine adult and youth gang activities that are affecting school safety. The task force will annually report its findings and recommendations to the education committees of the Legislature starting December 1, 2007.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 13, 2007.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Early Learning & K-12 Education): PRO: This
legislation begins to make use of the school mapping information system. The mapping system
has proved useful in real-life emergencies, such as fires, power outages, and nearby shootings.
Districts have a responsibility to keep schools safe. Ongoing updates of the school mapping
information system are needed for accurate information. Updates can be made in a few hours
each year. Mapping has to be used continually to be useful. Schools are at different places in
creating safe school plans. Principals do not have knowledge of the ICS and they are the first
responders in emergencies. It is important to train all staff. It needs to be clear which school
employees are in charge. It is crucial to create strong connections with state and local emergency
management agencies. ESDs are deeply involved already. It is useful for schools to think about
their role in the community. The plans must be comprehensive; emergencies created by winds
and floods are just as important as those created by violence. There will be some costs, including
emergency supplies and training, but this is an investment that needs to be made. Fiscal support
is necessary. A parent notification system should also be considered.
OTHER: The safety of children should be a part of basic education. Without fiscal support, these
requirements put pressure and strain on schools.
Persons Testifying (Early Learning & K-12 Education): PRO: Senator Rockefeller, prime
sponsor; Craig Apperson, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Joe Pope,
Association of Washington School Principals; John Hughes, Sunnyside School District; Lucinda
Young, Washington Educational Association; Don Pierce, WASPC; Norm Wisner, Association
of Educational Service Districts; Steven C. Bailey, Washington State Emergency Management
Association.
OTHER: Barbara Mertens, Washington Association of School Administrators; Dan Steel,
Washington State School Directors'Association; Frank Hewins, Franklin Pierce School District
and School Safety Center.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Ways & Means): PRO: Schools are at different places
in creating safe school plans. Due to the negotiation and compromise that went into this proposal,
this will not overburden school districts. This provides for needed training and drills and allows
for better collaboration between schools, emergency responders, and others. This also addresses
gang violence by creating a task force to address these issues.
OTHER: There is still concern about the unfunded mandate nature of this bill. While it has been
indicated that the fiscal requirements have been significantly reduced in the proposed substitute,
the impacts need to be fully funded in order for it to have the desired effect.
Persons Testifying (Ways & Means): PRO: Senator Rockefeller, prime sponsor; Craig
Apperson, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Joe Pope, Association of
Washington School Principals; Don Pierce, WASPC; Mitch Denning, Alliance of Education
Associations.
OTHER: Barbara Mertens, Washington Association of School Administrators.