SENATE BILL REPORT
SSB 5108
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Amended by House, April 10, 2007
Title: An act relating to farmland preservation.
Brief Description: Creating the office of farmland preservation.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Rasmussen, Jacobsen, Shin, Spanel, Swecker, Brandland, Hatfield and Parlette).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Agriculture & Rural Economic Development: 1/22/07, 2/08/07[DPS-WM].
Ways & Means: 2/19/07, 2/27/07 [DPS (ARED)].
Passed Senate: 3/08/07, 44-3.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5108 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators Rasmussen, Chair; Hatfield, Vice Chair; Schoesler, Ranking Minority Member; Jacobsen, Morton and Shin.
Staff: Bob Lee (786-7404)
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5108 as recommended by Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Prentice, Chair; Fraser, Vice Chair, Capital Budget Chair; Pridemore, Vice Chair, Operating Budget; Zarelli, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Fairley, Hatfield, Hewitt, Hobbs, Keiser, Kohl-Welles, Oemig, Parlette, Rasmussen, Roach, Rockefeller, Schoesler and Tom.
Staff: Kirstan Arestad (786-7708)
Background: In 2002, the Legislature enacted the Agricultural Conservation Easements
Program. The program's purpose is to facilitate the use of federal funds, and to help local
governments reduce the conversion of agricultural lands that have not otherwise been protected
through their planning processes.
All funds from legislative appropriations, and other sources directed by the Legislature including
gifts, grants, or endowments are to be deposited in the Agricultural Conservation Easements
Account. Expenditure from the account may be used only for the purchase of easements under
the Agricultural Conservation Easements Program.
The State Conservation Commission was charged to manage the program and adopt rules as
necessary to implement the Legislature's intent. The Commission is to report to the Legislature
on an on-going basis regarding potential funding sources and to recommend changes to existing
funding authorized by the Legislature.
Summary of Substitute Bill: An Office of Farmland Preservation is established within the State Conservation Commission. The office is authorized to:
A Farmland Preservation Task Force is established with the following voting members:
Two additional non-voting representatives must be requested to participate: the federal Natural
Resource Conservation Service and a person with technical expertise appointed by the Director
of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.
The task force members are entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses and must meet at least
twice a year. The task force terminates on January 1, 2011.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: Yes.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: (Agriculture & Rural Economic
Development) PRO: The most endangered species is our farmers. To preserve our farmers, we
need to preserve our farmlands. The office will be able to provide technical assistance and tools
to help preserve farmers. In 1974, Skagit County adopted a 40 acre minimum lot size in the
agriculture zone to protect the area for agricultural use. Since then, Skagit has protected 5,000
acres of these farmlands from using their development rights through a purchase of development
rights program. Loss of farmland is not only a concern in western Washington; there is a need
to look at leasing of a conservation easement. It is unclear whether "grazing lands" and livestock
producers are included.
CON: The building industry has concerns with state agencies placing easements on land in
perpetuity and artificially restricting the supply of land available for housing.
OTHER: Some farmers no longer have the ability to farm. Emphasis should be on saving those
who want to be saved.
Persons Testifying (Agriculture & Rural Economic Development): PRO: Senator Haugen;
Ellen Bynum, Friends of Skagit County and Western Washington Agricultural Association;
Carolyn Kelly, Skagit Conservation District; Don Stuart, American Farmland Trust; Fred Colvin,
Washington Association of Conservation Districts; Kaleen Cottingham, Futurewise; Jim
Armstrong, Spokane County Conservation District; Don Whiting, Grange; Dan Wood, Farm
Bureau; Suzie Kile, Jack Field, Washington Cattlemen's Association.
CON: Andrew Cook, Building Industry Association of Washington.
OTHER: Chris Cheney, citizen; Eric Johnson, Washington Association of Counties.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Substitute Bill (Ways & Means): PRO: This bill will provide farmers an opportunity to provide input on preserving farmlands. This issue is important to both eastern and western Washington. Funding is also important to slow down conversions and enhance viability of agricultural lands.
Persons Testifying (Ways & Means): PRO: Senator Haugen, prime sponsor; Ken Miller, Washington Farm Forestry Association; Fred Colvin, Washington Association of Conservation Districts.
House Amendment(s): The scope of the analysis of major factors influencing the loss or retention of agricultural lands is clarified. The conservation easements account may be used to purchase easements in perpetuity or for a fixed term. Governmental agencies are not to acquire by eminent domain agricultural land for wetland mitigation purposes.