SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5489
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As of February 9, 2007
Title: An act relating to alternative public works.
Brief Description: Changing alternative works provisions.
Sponsors: Senators Rockefeller and Fairley.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Government Operations & Elections: 2/12/07.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ELECTIONS
Staff: Mac Nicholson (786-7445)
Background: Alternative forms of public works were first used on a very limited basis and then
adopted in statute in 1994 for certain pilot projects. These alternative procedures included a
design-build process and a general contractor/construction manager (GC/CM) process and may
be used on projects costing in excess of $10 million. The authorization to use alternative public
works procedures expires June 30, 2007.
The design-build procedure is a multi-step competitive process to award a contract to a single
firm that agrees to both design and build a public works project valued over $10 million that
meets specific criteria. A design-build contract is awarded to the firm that submits the best and
final proposal with the lowest price following a public request for proposals and an extensive
evaluation of the proposals.
The GC/CM method employs the services of a project management firm that bears significant
responsibility and risk in the contracting process. The government agency contracts with an
architectural and engineering firm to design the facility and, early in the project, also contracts
with a GC/CM firm to assist in the design of the facility, manage the construction of the facility,
act as the general contractor, and guarantee that the facility will be built within budget. When the
plans and specifications for a project phase are complete, the GC/CM firm subcontracts with
construction firms to construct that phase. Initial selection of GC/CM finalists is based on the
qualifications and experience of the firm.
In 2003, job order contracting was authorized as an alternative public works contracting
procedure. Under a job order contract, a contractor agrees to perform an indefinite quantity of
public works jobs, defined by individual work orders, over a fixed period of time. A public entity
may not have more than two job order contracts in effect at any one time. The maximum total
dollar amount that is awarded under a job order contract may not exceed $3 million in the first
year, $5 million over the first two years, or $8 million over a three-year period if the contract is
renewed or extended.
With some restrictions, the use of alternative public works contracting procedures are authorized
to a limited number of public entities:
In 2005, the Capital Projects Advisory Review Committee was established to monitor and
evaluate the use of traditional and alternative public works contracting procedures and evaluate
potential future use of other alternative contracting procedures. The committee will also provide
a forum in which best practices and concerns about alternative public works contracting can be
discussed.
Summary of Bill: The use of alternative public works contracting procedures is extended to
2014. Public bodies seeking to use alternative public works contracting procedures must either
be certified to use such procedures, or receive approval on a project by project basis.
Project Review Committee: A project review committee (committee) is created to approve the
use of the design-build, GC/CM, or both procedures, through a certification process or through
approval on a project by project basis. Members of the committee are appointed by the Capital
Projects Advisory Review Board (Board), and appointments must represent a balance among the
industries and public owners represented on the Board. All meetings of the committee are public
and the committee must allow for public comment.
A determination by the committee may be appealed to the Board within seven days of the
committee's decision. The Board must resolve an appeal within 30 days, and the Board's decision
is final.
Certification Process: A public body may apply to the committee for a three-year certification
to use design-build, GC/CM, or both procedures. The public body must submit an application
to the committee that includes a description of its qualifications, its capital plan for the
certification period, its intended use of the alternative contracting procedures, and any other
information requested by the committee.
To certify a public body, the committee must determine that the public body has: the necessary
experience and qualifications to determine which projects are appropriate for the alternative
contracting procedures; the necessary experience and qualification to carry out the contracting
procedures; and resolved any audit findings on previous public works projects.
Once a public body has been certified to use design-build, GC/CM, or both procedures, it may
use the procedure without seeking project approval from the committee. However, a public body
certified to use GC/CM must seek additional approval to use that procedure for projects estimated
to cost less than $10 million.
A public body may seek re-certification for one additional three-year period by submitting
updated information on its capital plan to the committee. The committee may revoke any public
body's certification upon a finding that its use of the alternative contracting procedure no longer
serves the public interest.
Project by Project Approval: Public bodies that are not certified to use design-build or GC/CM
may seek approval to use the procedure on a project by project basis by submitting an application
that includes its qualifications, a description of the proposed project, and which alternative
contracting procedure it plans to use.
To approve a proposed project, the committee must determine: the alternative contracting
procedure will provide a substantial fiscal benefit or the use of the traditional method is not
practical for meeting the desired quality standards or delivery schedules; the project meets the
requirements for using the contracting procedure; the public body has the necessary experience
or qualified team to use the alternative procedure; for design-build projects, construction
personnel independent of the design-build team are knowledgeable in the design-build process;
and the public body has resolved any audit findings related to previous public works projects.
Design-Build: Several policy changes are made relating to the use of the design-build procedure.
The procedure may no longer be used for construction of student housing. Projects involving the
construction or erection of pre-engineered metal buildings or prefabricated modular buildings,
regardless of cost, do not need the approval of the committee. Operations and maintenance
services may be included in design-build contracts for a period of three years, except for utility
projects in which operations and maintenance may be ongoing.
Criteria for evaluating proposals for design-bid contracts are added and include the proposer's
technical qualifications, its capability to perform, and its past performance. Additional factors
are considered for analyzing finalists' proposals including: technical approach design concept;
proposal price; ability of the professional personnel; past performance on similar projects; ability
to meet time and budget requirements; ability to provide a performance and payment bond;
recent, current, and projected work loads of the firm; and location.
If all proposals are rejected, the public body must provide its reasons to the proposers in writing.
General Contractor/Construction Manager: The major policy changes related to the use of
GC/CM include the ability to use the procedure for projects valued under $10 million with the
approval of the committee and expansion of the criteria for a GC/CM project to include projects
that encompass a complex or technical work environment and projects that require specialized
work on a building that has historic significance.
Numerous other procedural changes are made to the contracting procedure.
Contract management responsibilities are expanded. The public body must provide contract
documents that obligate the public owner to accept or reject a request for equitable adjustment,
change order, or claim within 60 days. If the public owner does not respond in writing, the
request is deemed denied.
Incentive clauses for early completion, cost savings, or other performance goals must be included
in the request for proposals. Incentives may not be paid from any contingency fund established
for coordination of the construction documents or coordination of the work. The public body
must issue a change order within 30 days on change orders agreed to, in writing, by the GC/CM.
If the public body fails to issue the change order, interest at a rate of one percent per month shall
accrue on the dollar amount of the additional work satisfactorily completed.
The maximum allowable contract cost (MACC) on a GC/CM project may only be negotiated
when the design is at least 90 percent complete and major subcontractor bid packages may be bid
prior to agreement of the MACC. The public body may authorize the GC/CM to bid and award
bid packages before receipt of complete plans and specifications; however, any contracts awarded
must be incorporated in the negotiated MACC.
Bidder eligibility criteria for subcontractors currently listed in statute is removed and
responsibility is determined based on specific objective criteria that must be listed in the bid
documents.
A GC/CM may only bid on subcontract work or for the supply of equipment or materials if that
work is customarily performed or supplied by the GC/CM if the bid opening is managed by the
public body, and if notification of the GC/CM's intent to bid is included in the solicitation of bids.
The GC/CM is prohibited from purchasing equipment and materials for assignment to subcontract
bid package bidders for installation or warranty. The GC/CM may not perform subcontract work
in excess of 30 percent of the negotiated MACC.
Prebid determination of subcontractor eligibility must be preceded by a public hearing to receive
comments and determine if establishing bidder eligibility in advance of seeking bids is in the best
interests of the project.
Subcontract agreements must not delegate or assign the GC/CM's implied duty not to hinder or
delay a subcontractor or delegate or assign the GC/CM's authority to resolve subcontractor
conflicts; restrict a subcontractor's right to damages; require a subcontractor to bear the cost of
trade damage repair; or require the subcontractor to execute progress payment applications that
waive claims for additional time or compensation or bond or retainage rights as a condition of
receipt of progress payment.
Job Order Contracting: The authority to use the job order contracting procedure is limited to the
same public bodies and has not been expanded. The maximum total dollar amount awarded
under a job order contract is increased from $3 million to $4 million in the first year and from $8
million to $12 million over the three years of the contract. The Department of General
Administration is authorized to have four job order contracts in effect at any one time. The
amount of work that must be subcontracted on a job order contract is changed from 80 percent
to 90 percent. The maximum dollar amount of a work order is increased from $300,000 to
$350,000.
Data Collection: All contracting procedures require public owners, as well as contractors and
subcontractors, to report data required by the board. The board must develop questionnaires
designed to provide quantitative and qualitative data on alternative public works contracting
procedures.
The act contains a sunset provision and requires an evaluation by the Joint Legislative Audit and
Review Committee by June 30, 2013.
Creation of the Project Review Committee takes effect immediately. All other provisions of the
act take effect June 30, 2007.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: Yes.
Effective Date: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.