FINAL BILL REPORT
SSB 5533



C 375 L 07
Synopsis as Enacted

Brief Description: Revising procedures for individuals who are mentally ill and engaged in acts constituting criminal behavior.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Pflug, Hargrove, Kline, Swecker, Delvin, Stevens, Holmquist, Parlette and Hewitt).

Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections
Senate Committee on Ways & Means
House Committee on Human Services

Background: Under current law, an individual can stand trial for a crime only when competent. A person who is competent is one who is capable of understanding his or her position as a criminal defendant and the nature of the criminal proceedings, and able to assist counsel in his or her defense. Competency evaluations and competency restoration treatments can be ordered by the court if mental illness is an issue. In general, individuals who commit acts constituting misdemeanor crimes which are not serious crimes generally spend a maximum of 30 days in jail facilities. However, jail officials report that individuals with mental disorders who commit the same type of crimes spend an average of 60 - 90 days in jail.

In September 2006, the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) and the Washington affiliate of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) held a summit to address the increasing numbers, recidivism rates, and longer jail terms of offenders who suffer from mental illness.

Law enforcement-based crisis intervention teams and training to address increasing contacts with individuals with mental illness exist in some of the larger communities of Washington State. Some communities have crisis triage facilities or receiving centers for individuals with mental illness. Jail-based mental health services, including medications and stabilization, Mental Health Courts, and Drug Courts that can accommodate co-occurring disorders, have developed in communities across the state to address the issues presented by individuals with severe mental illness in the criminal justice system.

Summary: The legislative intent section of this bill states that the needs of individuals with mental illness and the public safety needs of society are better served when individuals with mental illness are provided with an opportunity to obtain treatment and support.

Police officers are permitted to divert individuals with mental illness who have been alleged to have committed misdemeanor crimes, which are not serious crimes, to mental health treatment. The general statutory provisions regarding competency evaluation and restoration of individuals with mental disorders are consolidated into one new section. New sections are created to address specific procedures in misdemeanor and felony restoration cases. Mental health professionals are permitted to return individuals to court at any time during the restoration period if they determine that the individual will not regain competency. Only individuals who have been alleged to have committed misdemeanor crimes that are serious in nature may be referred for competency restoration.

A crisis stabilization unit is defined as a short-term facility for individuals who require only stabilization and intervention. The Department of Social and Health Services is required to certify and to establish minimum standards for crisis stabilization units, such as:
   1) physical separation from the general offender population if in a jail;
   2) administering treatment by mental health professionals; and
   3) securing appropriately, given the nature of the crime involved.

The procedure for non-emergent detentions is modified and a definition of imminent is added. The summons process and 24-hour reporting period in non-emergent Involuntary Treatment Act cases is eliminated and replaced with an "order to detain" process. The individual who poses a likelihood of serious harm or grave disability may be detained if a judicial officer makes a probable cause finding based on the sworn statement of a mental health professional. It is expressly stated that no jail or correctional facility may be considered a less restrictive alternative.

Votes on Final Passage:

Senate      49   0
House      98   0   (House amended)
Senate      47   0   (Senate concurred)

Effective:   July 22, 2007