SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5622
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Labor, Commerce, Research & Development, February 27, 2007
Title: An act relating to collective bargaining for certain employees of institutions of higher education and related boards.
Brief Description: Changing collective bargaining eligibility requirements for certain employees of higher education institutions and related boards.
Sponsors: Senators Kohl-Welles, Roach, Keiser, Hobbs, Poulsen, Zarelli, Spanel, Shin, Pridemore, Kline, Hatfield, Kilmer, Oemig, Hargrove, Murray, McAuliffe and Rasmussen.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Labor, Commerce, Research & Development: 2/06/07, 2/27/07[DPS-WM, DNP, w/oRec].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR, COMMERCE, RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5622 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators Kohl-Welles, Chair; Keiser, Vice Chair; Franklin, Murray and Prentice.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senator Hewitt.
Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.Signed by Senators Clements, Ranking Minority Member and Holmquist.
Staff: Jennifer Strus (786-7316)
Background: Under the Personnel System Reform Act, employees of institutions of higher
education who are covered for purposes of civil service are also covered for purposes of state
employee collective bargaining.
Employees who are exempt from civil service, and therefore, from state employee collective
bargaining, are:
secretaries, administrative, and personal assistants;
Employees who are exempt from civil service, but covered for purposes of collective bargaining under laws other than the Personnel System Reform Act, are:
Classifications that may be made exempt from civil service by an institution's governing board, and therefore, from state employee collective bargaining, are those involving:
Other employees who are exempt from state employee collective bargaining are:
Summary of Bill: Under the Personnel System Reform Act, employees of institutions of higher
education who are exempt from state employee collective bargaining are listed. There are no
references to employees who are covered by or exempt from civil service.
Employees who are exempt from state employee collective bargaining are:
Employees who are exempt from state employee collective bargaining under the Personnel
System Reform Act, but covered for purposes of collective bargaining under other laws, are:
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY RECOMMENDED SUBSTITUTE AS PASSED
COMMITTEE (Labor, Commerce, Research & Development): RCW 41.56 is amended to
apply to higher education institution employees who are exempted from civil service, except for
the following persons: 1) executive employees; 2) managers who formulate, develop or establish
institutional policy or direct the work of an administrative division; or manage, administer or
control a program; have substantial responsibility for human resources, administration, legislative
relations, public information, internal audits or preparation of budgets; or functionally is above
the first level of supervision and exercises authority that is not routine or clerical; 3) employees
acting as principal assistants, administrative assistants, or personal assistants to executive
employees; 4) confidential employees; and 5) employees who assist AAGs who represent
managers or confidential employees in personnel or labor relations or tort matters.
Institutions of higher education and bargaining rep must not bargain over rights of management
as follows: functions and programs of institution, use of technology and structure of organization;
institution's budget and size of its workforce, including determining financial basis for layoffs;
right to take whatever actions are necessary to carry out mission of the state and institutions
during emergencies; retirement plans and benefits; health care benefits or other employee
insurance benefits.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: Bargaining rights should be extended to as many
people as possible. These rights should be extended to the last group of people without them.
Many staff at University of Washington do work that is fundamental to University of Washington
and yet, they do not have the right to collectively bargain. These employees want a voice and
must rely on the state Legislature to provide them with collective bargaining rights. Providing
these bargaining rights can only serve to enhance the state institutions in which these employees
work.
CON: The result of this bill is unintended consequences. For example, by including some of the
people in the list to be able to bargain, students hired as temporary employees could be included
in the bargaining unit. Some stakeholders were not contacted about this bill so they have many
questions. It is not clear what problem the bill is trying to address. It is also not clear why higher
education is targeted; problems with this issue in the community and technical college system
have not been heard of in the recent past.
OTHER: The ability of professionals to bargain is supported, but have concerns about unintended
consequences and why higher education is targeted. This bill would make management
employees eligible for bargaining which means some professional staff could bargain while others
could not and this could cause some conflicts of interest.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Suzanne Recordan, Sarah Laslett, University of Washington; Sandra
Schroeder, American Federation of Teachers Washington.
CON: John Boesenberg, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.
OTHER: Terry Teale, Council of Presidents; Larry Ganders, Washington State University,
Council of Presidents.