SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5803
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Transportation, March 1, 2007
Title: An act relating to authorizing the creation of regional transportation commissions.
Brief Description: Creating regional transportation commissions.
Sponsors: Senators Murray, Haugen, Swecker, Kastama and Kohl-Welles.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Transportation: 2/22/07, 3/01/07 [DPS, DNP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5803 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Haugen, Chair; Marr, Vice Chair; Murray, Vice Chair; Swecker, Ranking Minority Member; Berkey, Clements, Kastama, Kauffman, Sheldon and Spanel.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senators Benton, Delvin, and Holmquist.
Staff: Kelly Simpson (786-7403)
Background: Currently, many local transportation entities either exist, or are available to be created under current law, within the central Puget Sound region for the purposes of planning, funding, constructing, and/or operating transportation projects and services. The degree of coordination between the entities varies throughout the region. Some of the entities include:
The final recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Transportation, submitted December 1, 2000, included Recommendation #6: "Provide regions with the ability to plan, select, fund, and implement (or contract for implementation of) projects identified to meet the region's transportation and land use goals." Additionally, the Regional Transportation Commission, established under legislation enacted last session, issued in its December 31, 2006, final report, a primary recommendation stating that a single entity should be established in the central Puget Sound region "which has authority and responsibility for planning, prioritizing, and funding all modes of regional transportation . . ."
Summary of Bill: A nonpartisan 15-member Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) may
be created, in an area consisting of two or more contiguous counties with a combined population
greater than one million, for the purposes of planning, prioritizing, and funding all modes of
regional transportation projects within the RTC area. The RTC includes nine members elected
by district and six members appointed by the Governor with preferred expertise qualifications.
The RTC is responsible for developing a "regional mobility investment plan" to include a broad
array of transportation projects, including highway and public transportation projects, to be
submitted to regional voters. The plan must include revenue measures sufficient to finance the
proposed projects; a broad list of local revenue options is available under the bill to support
financing the plan. However, the RTC may not own, operate, construct, or maintain projects;
rather, it must contract out for these services.
The RTC must serve as the regional transportation planning organization (RTPO) in the
applicable area, replacing the existing RTPO, with authority to conduct regional transportation
and land use planning functions. The RTC must also serve as the metropolitan planning
organization (MPO) in the area for federal planning and funding purposes, if certain federal
requirements are satisfied.
The RTC must prioritize all state transportation projects within the RTC area, including
prioritizing the order in which state transportation funds for mobility projects are expended. The
RTC must receive state funds assigned to the region and control their disbursement for mobility
projects within the RTC area.
The RTC must create a Policy Advisory Board (PAB) to provide a forum for state, regional, and
local officials, transportation providers, and private citizens to deliberate issues that affect
transportation planning, prioritization, and funding within the RTC area. The PAB must
formally review and comment on the regional mobility investment plan, the transportation
improvement program prepared for federal purposes, and other documents relevant to the region
before adoption and implementation by the full RTC. If permitted by the federal government, the
PAB may serve as the policy board of an MPO.
If a local or regional entity, including Sound Transit, intends to submit a ballot measure to finance
regionally significant transportation projects within the RTC area, the RTC must first approve
sending the ballot measure to voters. A local entity may choose, subject to RTC approval, to
incorporate local ballot measures funding strictly localized projects into the RTC's regional
mobility investment plan.
The RTC assumes Sound Transit's planning functions and complete RTID authority. The RTC
has authority to approve Sound Transit's fares, routes, and classes of service. The RTC assumes
the Puget Sound Regional Council's staff and Sound Transit's planning staff.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY RECOMMENDED SUBSTITUTE AS PASSED
COMMITTEE (Transportation): An RTC must be created in King, Pierce, and Snohomish
Counties, and its governing body constituted and empowered by January 1, 2009 (but not before
January 1, 2008). Kitsap County may be added in the future. The RTC has an 11 member
governing body as follows: eight elected by electoral districts, and three appointed by the County
Executives and confirmed by their respective legislative authorities (each Executive gets one
pick). The RTID law is repealed, effective January 1, 2008, if no RTID exists by then. If an
RTID exists by January 1, 2008, the following occurs: the RTID dissolves when the RTC is
empowered, the RTC assumes the RTID obligations and project list, and the RTID law is repealed
January 1, 2009.
A single definition of "mobility project of regional significance" is provided, that includes both
roads and transit projects and services. The regional mobility investment plan (project list) must
be a comprehensive and integrated corridor-based multimodal package. The RTC planning
authority is expanded to include conducting comprehensive and integrated corridor-based
multimodal transportation planning and prioritizing activities. This includes coordinating and
integrating transportation and land use planning, including concurrency requirements.
The RTC is required to establish an incentives-based process of negotiating cooperative
relationships with local jurisdictions within the RTC area. The RTC may not directly control a
local jurisdiction's locally imposed funds, unless negotiated otherwise. The RTC, local planning
offices, and a new WSDOT administrative region dedicated solely to King, Pierce, and
Snohomish counties, must negotiate a process that ensures the agencies are planning for a
comprehensive and integrated corridor-based multimodal regional transportation system.
The RTC must negotiate with the state and appropriate local jurisdictions to prioritize all state
transportation projects in the region.
The RTC may own, operate, construct, or maintain projects, only if negotiated and agreed upon
by applicable parties.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill is intended to help solve some of the
problems regarding establishing a truly integrated transportation system in the central Puget
Sound region. Regional governments exist all over the world and function well.
CON: The timing of the effective date of this legislation is a problem, as it may disrupt the
upcoming RTID/ST vote at the 2007 general election. Those two agencies are working well
together, and establishing another governing entity would be disruptive. This bill is not a
consolidation, rather it creates more layers of governance. The land use functions in the bill, to
be truly effective, need more authority; however, this would impair existing local control policies.
A concern exists that transit money will be shifted to highway projects.
OTHER: New governance is needed in the central Puget Sound region; however, this bill would
be too disruptive to the upcoming regional vote at the general election. The bill is a good first
step, but it lacks a general mission and purpose, and a way to meet the goals laid out in the bill.
The bill should attempt to do no harm to existing operations and service.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Murray, prime sponsor; Marc Frazer, Washington
Roundtable; Dave Overstreet, AAA of Washington; Norman Rice, Reid Shockey, Regional
Transportation Commission.
CON: Ashley Probart, Association of Washington Cities; Mark Olson, City of Everett, Sound
Transit Board; Claudia Balducci, Bellevue City Councilmember; Steve Sheehy, Sound Transit.
OTHER: Lynne Griffith, Pierce Transit; Rick Olson, Puget Sound Regional Council; Julie
Murray, Washington State Association of Counties; Genesee Adkins, Transportation Choices
Coalition.