SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5867
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As of February 27, 2007
Title: An act relating to the authorization of tribal, Indian nation, and bureau of Indian affairs law enforcement and public safety officers to act as Washington state peace officers.
Brief Description: Authorizing tribal, Indian nation, and bureau of Indian affairs law enforcement and public safety officers to act as Washington peace officers.
Sponsors: Senators Kline and Sheldon.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Judiciary: 2/13/07.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Staff: Juliana Roe (786-7405)
Background: Under current law, tribal officers cannot issue citations or arrest non-Indians on
tribal land unless the employer tribe has a cross-commission or is cross-deputized with a local
law enforcement agency, such as the county sheriff. Tribal officers only have authority to stop
and detain non-Indians for criminal acts on the reservation. Once the alleged perpetrator is
detained, the tribal officer must wait for local law enforcement, such as the county sheriff or
Washington State Patrol (WSP), to arrive.
With regard to civil traffic regulation, tribes may regulate conduct of non-members that imperils
the political integrity, economic security, health, or welfare of the tribe. Nevada v. Hicks, 533
U.S. 353 (2001); Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981). Courts have construed this
very narrowly. Courts have held that generalized health and safety concerns associated with
traffic regulation do not necessarily give tribal officers authority over non-Indians because
careless driving endangers everyone and does not uniquely threaten tribal interests. The
presumption is against the existence of tribal regulatory authority over non-Indian motorists on
public roadways and highways. However, a tribe may be able to prove fact specific instances
justifying the assertion of such tribal authority.
Proponents of this bill believe that tribal officers, with sufficient training, should be allowed to
deal with events that occur on the reservation. It is believed that passage of this bill would take
away confusion regarding under what circumstances a tribal officer is allowed to stop and detain
a non-Indian on the reservation.
Summary of Bill: Tribal law enforcement or public safety officers, who have entered into an
agreement with the WSP after completing 400 hours of training at the Washington law
enforcement academy, are allowed to exercise general authority peace officer powers over non-Indian persons when those individuals are on tribal lands or within the external boundaries of
Indian reservations.
The agreement must contain the following conditions: (1) proof of adequate public liability and
property damage insurance; (2) the chief of the WSP has the authority to suspend any
commission; (3) the chief of the WSP is required to suspend the agreement with five days' notice
if any provision of the agreement is violated; (4) any citation issued pursuant to a commission is
required to be sent to a Washington State court, except for those issued to Indians within the
boundaries of the Indian reservation; (5) there must be at least one meeting with the chief of the
WSP patrol each year to discuss the status of the agreement; (6) any citations required to be
provided to a Washington court must be submitted to the chief of the WSP within five days; and
(7) commissioned tribal officers are allowed to proceed in hot pursuit of an offender beyond the
boundaries of the reservation.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: CON: A mechanism already exists in Washington State
that would allow tribal officers to be cross-commissioned or cross-deputized. In many
jurisdictions across the state, the county sheriffs and local tribal entities have entered into
agreements for cross-deputization. Last year, the Legislature provided tribal officers with a
procedure in which tribal officers can obtain certification in the Washington law enforcement
academy. This is a matter better left to be dealt with by county sheriffs.
There are also concerns regarding why the WSP has been given the duty of authorizing
commission of tribal officers. The fact that the state patrol is involved would imply that this
deals with state-wide jurisdiction rather than a more limited jurisdiction.
Washington police officers are required to have 720 hours of law enforcement training and are
encouraged to continue this education. Tribal officers, under this bill, will only be required to
attend 400 hours of law enforcement training. This creates inconsistency. Some officers worry
that tribal officers would lack sufficient training. Furthermore, county sheriffs and state troopers
are required to obtain polygraph and psychological exams prior to employment. This is not
required of tribal officers. The lack of these exams in tribal officers causes concern that the
sheriffs or the state patrol would have to assume liability of those tribal officers.
OTHER: There does not currently exist a 400 hour class for law enforcement training. The
sheriffs require a 720 hour class and the state patrol requires a little more than that.
Persons Testifying: CON: Don Pierce, Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.
OTHER: Cari Brezonick, Criminal Justice Training Commission.