SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5869
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Government Operations & Elections, February 19, 2007
Title: An act relating to the collection of personally identifiable information by state agencies.
Brief Description: Monitoring personal information collected by state agencies.
Sponsors: Senators Kline, Fairley, Franklin and Keiser.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Government Operations & Elections: 2/12/07, 2/19/07 [DPS].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ELECTIONS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5869 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Fairley, Chair; Oemig, Vice Chair; Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Benton, Kline, Pridemore and Swecker.
Staff: Sharon Swanson (786-7447)
Background: The Department of Information Services (Department) was created to provide
coordinated planning and management of state information services. The Washington State
Information Services Board (Board) was created to provide direction to state agencies on strategic
planning and technical policies for information services, to develop acquisition standards, and to
assist agencies in acquiring and implementing information services.
The Department's duties include reviewing agency information technology portfolios;
implementing statewide and interagency policies, standards, and guidelines; making information
services available to state agencies, local governments, and public benefit nonprofit corporations
on a full cost-recovery basis; establishing rates and fees for services provided by the Department;
and performing all duties delegated to it by the Board.
Summary of Bill: The bill as referred to committee not considered.
Summary of Proposed Substitute (Government Operations & Elections): The Department
of Information Services (Department) must create and maintain a registry of information systems
maintained by state agencies that contain personally identifiable information.
The registry must contain at least the following information about each information technology
system used to conduct official public business:
The registry is not required to include systems that contain personally identifiable information
pertaining solely to public officials acting in their official capacity.
Personally identifiable information is defined as information that can be associated with a
particular natural person through one or more identifiers or other information.
Official public business is defined as any legally authorized transaction or communication
between a state agency and federal government, another state agency, tribes, or local
governments, or between a state agency, tribe, or local government and a private person or entity.
The information contained in the registry is privileged and confidential and is exempt from public
disclosure.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY RECOMMENDED SUBSTITUTE AS PASSED COMMITTEE (Government Operations & Elections): The section of the bill exempting the information contained in the registry from public disclosure is removed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill will help protect the personal information
that is collected by state agencies by collecting information on information that is gathered
unnecessarily or is duplicative. The bill is an attempt to understand why government collects the
information that it does about individuals. If government needs the information it collects, then
that is fine. If not, then the government should not collect the information. The computer
security personnel at the Department of Information Services have reviewed the bill and seem
satisfied with the drafting.
OTHER: While this bill is a good idea, there is a concern that the listing of the agencies and the
data that they collect is privileged and is not disclosable. The public should have access to this
information. What if a citizen wanted to know if a public agency was releasing or selling his or
her private information? The information is now disclosable if you go to each individual agency;
why would it not be disclosable just because it is kept on one databank? There is an additional
concern that placing all of this information in one location creates a target for hackers. Exactly
what information is it that we are getting that we don't need? The vast majority of information
that is collected is voluntary.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Kline, prime sponsor; Tamara Jones, Department of
Information Systems.
OTHER: Rowland Thompson, Allied Daily Newspapers; Randy Hodges, University of
Washington.