SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5943
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As of February 28, 2007
Title: An act relating to establishing a new high poverty school district allocation.
Brief Description: Establishing a high poverty school district allocation.
Sponsors: Senators Brandland, Holmquist, Hobbs, Clements, Rasmussen, Marr, Regala, Hargrove, Kohl-Welles and Parlette.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Early Learning & K-12 Education: 2/28/07.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON EARLY LEARNING & K-12 EDUCATION
Staff: Eric Bratton (786-7438)
Background: One of the primary methods for providing state funding for public schools is
through formula allocations. Formula allocations include large state-funded programs, such as
basic education, special education, and pupil transportation, and are based on student enrollments
and other characteristics of each school district. Allocations are paid on a predefined schedule.
Competitive grants are also used as a funding source for public schools. The state and federal
governments currently offer competitive grants that target students failing to meet academic
standards, students in high poverty areas, and school districts that are trying to reduce class sizes
and provide extended learning for students, in addition to other education reform programs.
These programs and funds include, among others, the Learning Assistance Program (LAP), the
Student Achievement Fund, and federal Title I allocations.
Several studies have shown a correlation between poverty and low student performance. As of
May 2006, 36.7 percent of Washington State students qualified for free or reduced price lunches,
which is used as an indicator of poverty. If the household income of a student is 130 percent or
less of the federal poverty level, the student qualifies for free lunches under the federal program
that funds the free and reduced price lunches. For students to qualify for reduced price lunches,
household income must be 185 percent or less of the federal poverty rate.
Summary of Bill: Starting with the 2007-08 school year, a new allocation will be established
to provide additional funding to school districts in high poverty areas. A school district is eligible
for an additional allocation if, in the October headcount enrollment of the prior school year, the
number of students eligible for free lunch exceeded the statewide average. Eligible school
districts will receive an additional allocation based on the percentage by which the district's
students eligible for free lunch exceeded the statewide average, multiplied by $581 per K-12
full-time equivalent student in that district in the prior school year.
After the 2007-08 school year, the amount of the per-student allocation will be adjusted for
inflation as measured by the average annual consumer price index, compiled by the bureau of
labor statistics, in the prior fiscal year. The additional allocation will not be considered part of
the Legislature's definition of basic education and is intended to augment and not supplant
funding provided through LAP, the Student Achievement Fund, federal Title I allocations, or any
other source currently spent on activities addressing poverty.
Each district receiving an allocation will be required to annually report to its citizens the impact
of the additional allocation by looking at graduation rates, student attendance, student
achievement, closing the achievement gap, and reducing dropouts.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 22, 2007.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: There is a direct correlation between poverty and low WASL scores. Providing additional money to high poverty schools could help create a connection between students in poverty and the school by expanding extended day learning opportunities, for example. In order to provide programs that address the needs of students in high poverty areas, there needs to be more funding. Concern is expressed that the main goal needs to be fully funding K-12 education.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Brandland, prime sponsor; Barbara Mertens, Washington Association of School Administrators; Tim Yeomans, Mount Baker School District; Mitch Demming, Alliance of Education Associations.