SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6024
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Financial Institutions & Insurance, February 27, 2007
Title: An act relating to assisting low-income persons to obtain affordable automobile liability insurance.
Brief Description: Assisting low-income persons to obtain affordable automobile liability insurance.
Sponsors: Senators Franklin, Kauffman, Regala, Shin, Berkey, Marr, Pridemore, Fraser, Rockefeller, Rasmussen, Kohl-Welles, Kastama and Keiser.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Financial Institutions & Insurance: 2/20/07, 2/27/07 [DP-WM, DNP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE
Majority Report: Do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators Berkey, Chair; Hobbs, Vice Chair; Franklin, Hatfield and Prentice.
Minority Report: Do not pass.
Signed by Senators Benton, Ranking Minority Member; Parlette and Schoesler.
Staff: Aaron Gutierrez (786-7448)
Background: Current law requires that all drivers in Washington meet certain financial
responsibility requirements. These requirements are in place to make certain that drivers who
injure third parties' person or property are able to provide compensation. There are three ways
to meet the financial responsibility requirements: (1) liability insurance with adequate limits; (2)
a certificate of deposit for at least $60,000; or (3) a liability bond for at least $60,000. Fleets of
26 or more vehicles may self-insure.
Nearly all Washington drivers choose to meet the financial responsibility requirement through
liability insurance. Liability insurance must have the following coverage limits to meet
Washington's driver financial responsibility requirements:
Regulation and oversight of the insurance industry is conducted by the Office of the Insurance
Commissioner (OIC). The OIC must approve all insurance rates and policies and reviews
insurers conduct to ensure compliance with agency rules and state law.
As mandated by statute, the OIC has created the Washington Automobile Insurance Plan. The
plan is an assigned risk pool that provides insurance to drivers who cannot otherwise find liability
insurance in the market. The drivers who participate in this plan are viewed as high risk by
insurers because of their driving records. The plan is overseen by the OIC and is administered
by a national management organization and service provider to the insurance industry. All
insurers who write automobile liability insurance in Washington are required to participate in this
assigned risk pool.
Summary of Bill: A low-income auto liability policy is created for qualifying drivers. Qualified drivers under this bill are permitted to have liability coverage limits that are lower than is required for standard auto liability coverage. The required limits for low-income auto liability policies are:
In order to be eligible for a low-income liability policy, a driver must not have a household
income that is more than 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Additionally, the driver must
satisfy the risk standards for eligibility that are adopted by the OIC. The OIC's risk standards
must preclude drivers who present an excessive risk because of fraud, accident history, or driving-related felony or misdemeanor convictions under Title 46. However, the eligibility criteria may
only evaluate the past three years.
The policy term for low-income auto liability policies is one year and they must be renewable
as long as the policyholder meets the income and risk requirements and has made timely premium
payments.
The OIC must approve all rates and policy forms; rates must be sufficient to cover losses and
reasonable administration. The OIC may appoint a manager or committee to administer the low-income policy plan. Further, the OIC has the authority to adopt any rules necessary to implement
the plan.
Coverage for the low income auto liability plan is apportioned equally among insurers who write
automobile liability insurance in Washington.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: There are already many uninsured drivers on the
road and auto liability premiums continue to rise. Insured drivers have to bear the cost of
uninsured drivers. Low wage earners do not have any options when it comes to meeting the
financial responsibility required by the state. This bill will help those who are currently uninsured
and reduce the number of uninsured people. A low income auto liability insurance policy may
not be a perfect solution to the problem, but at least it is a start. If a driver is struggling to pay for
his or her most basic needs, auto insurance is either not an option or a very low priority. When
a low income person does not have auto liability insurance, a downward spiral occurs when they
receive a ticket for having no insurance or get into an accident. A ticket or an accident may cause
them to lose their license or their vehicle, which in turn may make it difficult to earn a living and
take care of children. Public transportation is not an option for people living in rural areas or for
working parents; these people need to drive. Low wage earners often pay more in monthly
payments for insurance than they do for their vehicles. We need to give low income people an
opportunity to comply with the law. A similar program in California has much lower premiums
than standard auto liability policies have. An inability to have auto liability insurance is a barrier
to upward economic mobility.
CON: Low income people have no incentive to buy liability insurance because they do not have
any assets to protect; therefore, there is likely to be little interest in this program and it will not
reduce the number of uninsureds. Passing this bill would be misleading to the public because it
would suggest that the problem has been solved, when it has not. The limits are too low in these
policies; they would not even cover a fender bender. Washington should just do away with
mandatory liability insurance. Alternative solutions are to not require low income drivers to carry
liability insurance or to use state funds to assist drivers in obtaining policies with lower
premiums. This bill is worse than nothing because it will make the public cynical. There is no
guarantee that just because policies under this program have lower limits that they will be
inexpensive. This legislation could encourage low income drivers who currently have standard
auto liability policies to drop down to these policies with the lower limits, which is detrimental
to people who may be injured by these drivers. There are a lot of drivers who will never buy
liability insurance no matter how inexpensive.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Valorie Crout, Associated Ministries of Tacoma-Pierce County;
Robin Zukoski, Columbia Legal Services; Susan Crane, Port Jobs; Larry Shannon, Washington
State Trial Lawyers Association.
CON: Mel Sorensen, Property Casualty Insurers Association; Mike Kupphahn, Farmers
Insurance; Cliff Webster, American Insurance Association.