SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6136
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As of March 2, 2007
Title: An act relating to the state wildlife account.
Brief Description: Regarding the state wildlife account.
Sponsors: Senators Pridemore and Jacobsen.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Ways & Means: 3/01/07.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Staff: Kirstan Arestad (786-7708)
Background: State Wildlife Account: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) is funded
from several sources including the State Wildlife Account (SWA). The SWA is an appropriated
account comprised of numerous sub accounts. Approximately 15 percent of the SWA is used for
specified dedicated purposes (e.g., turkey and pheasant hunting, sampling, monitoring, and
management of Dungeness crab recreational fisheries, etc.). The remaining 85 percent is used
for game management and research, sport fish management and research, hatcheries, wildlife
areas, and more.
The SWA is primarily funded by hunting, fishing and other recreational licenses, permits, stamps,
or validations. Under current law, these license and permit fees are set in statute. SWA license
and permit fee revenues include:
1) turkey tag; .
2) western Washington pheasant permit/stamp;
3) migratory bird validation;
4) special hunting season permit;
5) annual fish and wildlife lands vehicle use permit;
6) catch record card;
7) Dungeness crab endorsement license;
8) personal use saltwater, combination, or shellfish and seaweed license;
9) short term charter stamp;
10) big game hunting licenses–numerous combinations;
11) small game hunting license–various combinations;
12) taxidermy license;
13) fur dealer's license;
14) fish guide license;
15) game farm license;
16) game fish stocking permit;
17) fishing on field trial permit;
18) fishing contest permit; and
19) anadromous game fish buyer's license.
The SWA has experienced shortfalls in the amount of $17 million in 1998; $3.2 million in 2005;
and $4.5 million projected in 2007. Account shortfalls have been addressed through program
reductions and temporary loans.
Hydraulic Project Approval Permit: A hydraulic project approval (HPA) permit is required for
any project or work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the
salt or fresh waters of the state before beginning the construction work. The permits are issued
by the DFW, but the agency does not charge a fee to process or issue a hydraulic permit. The
HPA permit program is primarily supported with General Fund dollars; about a quarter of the
program is supported with SWA funds. Inspection and monitoring of hydraulic projects are not
being performed due to a lack of funding.
Summary of Bill: It is the policy of the state that the SWA be self supporting and that the license
and permit fee revenues to the SWA must be self sufficient to fund the cost of the DFW's
programs that support those activities.
The Fish and Wildlife Commission is authorized to periodically adjust license and permit fees
to ensure that the SWA revenues are sufficient to fund these activities. However, license and
permit fees may not be increased by more than 10 percent in any calendar year without the prior
approval of the Legislature.
By July 1, 2009, the DFW is also directed to develop and implement a fee schedule for hydraulic
project permits that is sufficient to fund the entire cost of the HPA permitting program, including
monitoring and inspection activities.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 27, 2007.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: The Fish and Wildlife Commission supports the
bill. As you know, the cost of doing business increases annually due to inflation and the
department's license fee structure has not kept pace. SB 6136 would permit the Commission to
adjust license fees as necessary to keep up with inflation. The last adjustment made to license
fees was in 2002. Also, the last work done on the development of a fee for the currently free
Hydraulics Project Approval permits was in 2002. A proposed HPA fee structure was considered
by a citizens' HPA Task force, which would become the foundation of discussions with our HPA
customers.
CON: This measure takes away our opportunity to provide input. The current problem with the
State Wildlife Account is in some way the direct result of what has transpired in the last two
biennia, which has been to cost shift to this account. Sixty million dollars a biennium is what
we're already putting into this account. We also have concerns with the underlying concept of
giving up control of fee increases that can be increased up to 10 percent a year. The only
component of the bill we support is the HPA fee issue. This committee should also look to non-consumptive users to help pay for some of the costs. The regulated community is very interested
in making this account healthy.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Jeff Koenings, Director, Department of Fish and Wildlife.
CON: Ed Owens, Hunters Heritage Council, Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management,
Coalition of Coastal Fisheries.