SENATE BILL REPORT
2SSB 6222
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed Senate, February 15, 2008
Title: An act relating to long-term care.
Brief Description: Expanding programs for persons needing long-term care.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Keiser, Kohl-Welles and Franklin).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Health & Long-Term Care: 1/14/08, 1/23/08 [DPS-WM].
Ways & Means: 2/05/08, 2/07/08 [DP2S].
Passed Senate: 2/15/08, 49-0.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH & LONG-TERM CARE
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6222 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators Keiser, Chair; Franklin, Vice Chair; Pflug, Ranking Minority Member; Carrell, Fairley, Kastama, Kohl-Welles, Marr and Parlette.
Staff: Rhoda Donkin (786-7465)
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6222 be substituted therefor, and the second substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Prentice, Chair; Fraser, Vice Chair, Capital Budget Chair; Pridemore, Vice Chair, Operating Budget; Zarelli, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Carrell, Fairley, Hatfield, Hewitt, Hobbs, Honeyford, Keiser, Kohl-Welles, Oemig, Parlette, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schoesler and Tom.
Staff: Chelsea Buchanan (786-7446)
Background: In 2005 legislation directed the Governor to establish a task force to develop
recommendations for improving the delivery of long-term care services for current and future
generations.
The task force held public meetings around the state, established three advisory groups, and hired
an outside consultant to provide data on alternative private and public funding sources to pay for
long-term care. Policy discussions that evolved from the process focused on supporting and
expanding the most widespread source of long-term care – that of family and informal caregivers.
It was determined that informal caregivers – family, friends, and neighbors who make up the vast
majority of care providers – need more access to information, community services, respite,
equipment, counseling, training, and other forms of support to continue to care for loved ones in
their homes and neighborhoods for as long as possible. Further, it was determined that better use
of preventive health care strategies, and improved management of chronic care would promote
and sustain informal caregiving around the state.
Summary of Second Substitute Bill: Caregivers who provide critical health and safety support
to long-term care recipients may receive a one-time voucher benefit which may be used for respite
or other services. The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) will develop a caregiver
assessment and referral tool to determine eligibility for this benefit and other services. Statewide
services provided by DSHS and the area agencies on aging will include long-term care planning,
counseling, crisis intervention, and streamlined access to community based services.
Boarding homes are not required to develop discharge plans for respite care services. Boarding
homes may do a short preadmission assessment for residents entering for respite care.
The Department of Health is directed to develop a statewide senior fall prevention program. The
program will include affordable senior focused exercise programs, community education, and
assessments on falls risk identification and reduction.
DSHS is directed to provide additional support to residents in community settings who exhibit
challenging behaviors that put them at risk for institutional placement.
A dental access project is proposed for seniors and adults with disabilities. The program will
provide enhanced reimbursement rates for certified dentists who provide specific procedures and
for medical providers who provide preventive oral health services. Coordination with the
University of Washington and outreach with the community is identified.
All items above are subject to funding appropriated for that specific purpose. Also, if specific
funding is not provided for the bill, referencing it by bill or chapter number in the omnibus
appropriations act by the end of June 2008, (2008 supplemental operating budget), the bill is null
and void.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill (Health & Long-Term Care): PRO:
These expansions in key programs for the elderly will improve access to current services that help
people live independently. Informal care givers need more respite options and more information.
Expanding dental services to the elderly is critical because many people over age 65 have no
dental insurance and dental disease is closely tied to chronic illness. Efforts to educate and
prevent injuries from senior falls will reduce suffering and lower hospital costs. These provisions
were the result of a lot of discussion about developing services for people who want to continue
to age in their homes and not enter the long- term care system.
OTHER: The bill should not eliminate assessments done on short term respite care clients in
boarding homes and adult family homes. These facilities should be fully aware of the needs of
anyone who is admitted, even if it's only for a few days. The dental pilot should be open to
anyone with a disability who can't access dental services.
Persons Testifying (Health & Long-Term Care): PRO: Elaine Armantrout, physical therapist;
Gary Weeks, Washington Health Care Association; Dennis Mahar, Area Agencies on Aging;
Taura Lee, Diane Oakes, Washington Dental Service Foundation; Bruce Reeves, Senior Citizens
Lobby; Deb Murphy, Bonnie Blachly, Washington Association Housing and Services for the
Aging; Laurie Jinkins, Washington State Department of Health.
OTHER: Nancy James, Leslie Emerick, Home Care Association Washington; Elizabeth Phelan,
M.D., University of Washington, Geriatric Medicine; Louise Ryan, Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Program.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on First Substitute Bill (Ways & Means): PRO: This bill will allow people to remain in their homes and in less costly long-term care settings. Lack of dental care for seniors can be a matter of life and death because of its interaction with chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. The dental portion of the bill will pull in private funding and the expertise of the University of Washington Dental School, and it has an evaluation component. Informal and unpaid caregivers need additional supports. Increased training for adult family homes will improve the quality of life for residents.
Persons Testifying (Ways & Means): PRO: Senator Karen Keiser, prime sponsor; Gary Weeks, Washington Health Care Association; Tara Lee, Washington Dental Service; Dennis Mahar, Washington Association of Area Agencies on Aging; Hope Concepcion-Reffet, Alzheimer's Association and Adult Family Home provider.