SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6560
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Water, Energy & Telecommunications, February 08, 2008
Title: An act relating to public utility district contracts.
Brief Description: Regarding public utility district contracts.
Sponsors: Senators Honeyford, Morton, Delvin and Swecker.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Water, Energy & Telecommunications: 1/30/08, 2/08/08 [DPS, DNP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WATER, ENERGY & TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6560 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Rockefeller, Chair; Delvin, Fraser, Oemig, Pridemore and Regala.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senators Holmquist and Morton.
Staff: Sam Thompson (786-7413)
Background: PUD Work Contracting. Public utility districts (PUDs) must contract for work
estimated to cost over $10,000 or work using material costing over $50,000.
PUD Materials Contracting. Generally, PUDs must contract to purchase over $10,000 of items
of one kind. They must also contract to purchase over $5,000 of items of one kind in any calendar
month.
PUDs may use an informal vendor list contracting procedure when purchasing material of one
kind worth over $10,000 and less than $50,000. This procedure involves soliciting quotations
from at least three vendors on a vendor list whenever possible to assure that a competitive price
is established and that a contract is awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. PUDs establish and
revise vendor lists by publishing a notice, at least twice a year, soliciting vendors for inclusion
on the list.
Summary of Bill (Recommended Substitute): PUD Work Contracting. The maximum
estimated cost of work done by PUDs without contracting is raised to $25,000, and the maximum
cost of material used in work by PUDs without contracting is raised to $150,000.
PUD Materials Contracting. The maximum cost of items of one kind purchased without
contracting is raised to $15,000, and the maximum cost of items of one kind purchased in any
calendar month without contracting is raised to $7,500.
The minimum cost of items of one kind purchased using the vendor list contracting procedure is
raised to $15,000. The maximum cost of items of one kind purchased using that procedure is
raised to $60,000.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY WATER, ENERGY & TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): The proposed maximum cost of material used in work by PUDs without contracting is changed from $200,000 only for PUDs in counties with fewer than two qualified bidders to $150,000 for all PUDs. Provisions are added that set new maximums of:
A new range of $15,000 to $60,000 is established for materials purchased using the informal vendor list contracting procedure. Language providing that these limits apply on a per-calendar month basis is deleted.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: PRO: There have been no increases
since 1990 in the maximum cost of material used in work by PUDs without contracting, and the
current limit of $50,000 is far too low. A proposed increase to $200,000 for that limit is based
upon the pre-1990 figure of $30,000, set in 1955, adjusted for inflation. For their own safety,
PUD work crews need to be able to conduct more in-house work to refresh their knowledge, skills
and abilities. Materials costs in recent years have increased far greater than inflation. The best
elements of all three bills should be blended.
CON: Private contractors should do the work that PUD crews seek to do under the terms of this
legislation. The proposed new limits on in-house work by PUDs apply to more than just "wire-running;" they apply to construction, plumbing, and other work. While inflation should be
acknowledged, the increases proposed are too high and the effect is anti-competitive. Archaic
provisions in existing law should be clarified and updated.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Keiser; Andrew Munro, Sam Dees, Grant PUD; Bob
Wittenburg, Skamania PUD; Bill Dobbins, Douglas PUD.
CON: Larry Stevens, National Electrical Contractors and Mechanical Contractors; Van Collins,
Associated General Contractors.