2SHB 3181 -
By Representatives Springer, Nelson
03/19/2010
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 This act may be known and cited as the
clean water act of 2010.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 (1) The legislature finds that nonpoint
water pollution and contaminated storm water runoff creates a
significant ecological burden on the rivers, aquifers, lakes, streams,
and marine receiving waters across Washington and imposes a significant
economic burden on many of the state's businesses and residents.
(2) The legislature recognizes that the burden of nonpoint and
storm water pollution is caused by both increased volumes of water
runoff due to the expansion of impervious surfaces and the toxic
substances that pollute the runoff. The burden of storm water and
nonpoint pollution from hazardous substances is difficult to offset
because the source of pollution is not a single physical point, but
occurs wherever the toxic substances are manufactured, used, or
consumed.
(3) The legislature finds that the federal government and the state
of Washington have identified control of pollutants in storm water
runoff through national pollutant discharge elimination system phase I
and II municipal storm water permits as a requirement for the state and
local jurisdictions. Impacts from the polluted storm water may be
prevented or controlled through retrofit projects for existing
infrastructure as well as other means.
(4) The legislature finds that resources available to offset the
direct burdens of storm water pollution by hazardous substances are
insufficient to meet existing needs. Existing funding is raised
largely by local governments and is disproportionately borne by fees
levied on individuals and property owners.
(5) Finally, the legislature finds that increasing the tax on
hazardous substances is necessary to fund programs that will offset the
burdens that pollution places on the environment and the waters of the
state.
Sec. 3 RCW 82.21.030 and 1989 c 2 s 10 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) A tax is imposed on the privilege of possession of hazardous
substances in this state. The rate of the tax ((shall be)) is seven-tenths of one percent multiplied by the wholesale value of the
substance.
(b) Beginning May 1, 2010, an additional tax is imposed on the
privilege of possession of hazardous substances in this state. The
rate of the tax is 0.85 percent multiplied by the wholesale value of
the substance. A credit is allowed, in accordance with rules adopted
by the department, for taxes paid under this subsection (1)(b) with
respect to any possession of petroleum products when the petroleum
products are exported for use or sale outside this state.
(2)(a) Moneys collected under ((this chapter shall)) subsection
(1)(a) of this section must be deposited in the toxics control accounts
under RCW 70.105D.070 and expended in accordance with the purposes
stated therein.
(b) Moneys collected under subsection (1)(b) of this section must
be deposited into the clean water legacy fund hereby created in the
state treasury.
(3) Chapter 82.32 RCW applies to the tax imposed in this chapter.
The tax due dates, reporting periods, and return requirements
applicable to chapter 82.04 RCW apply equally to the tax imposed in
this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 76.09 RCW
to read as follows:
Consistent with RCW 76.09.405, the department must administer any
money deposited in the forest and fish support account from the clean
water legacy fund to fund activities pursuant to the state's
implementation of the forests and fish report as defined in this
chapter and related activities including but not limited to adaptive
management or monitoring.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5 A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The storm water account is created in the state treasury. Any
moneys in the account are allocated to the department of ecology and
may be spent only after appropriation. Expenditures from the account
must be used on activities or projects that mitigate or prevent storm
water pollution as provided in this section.
(2)(a) After deducting the department's administrative costs of no
more than four percent of the appropriations included in the omnibus
operating and capital appropriations acts associated with administering
a competitive grant process, moneys must be distributed annually as
provided in (b) of this subsection.
(b)(i) By January 1, 2011, and by January 1st of each year
thereafter, seventy-five thousand dollars must be provided to each
jurisdiction that is subject to the national pollutant discharge
elimination system phase I or phase II requirements.
(ii)(A) Until July 1, 2011, all of the remaining moneys must be
allocated through the grant process to local governments covered by
national pollutant discharge elimination system municipal phase I or
phase II permits to fund local government projects or activities that
mitigate or prevent contamination of storm water or the recontamination
of receiving waters previously remediated under federal or state-approved activities. To be eligible, local governments must provide
fifty percent of project or activity costs from other nonstate fund
sources.
(B) Beginning July 1, 2011, fifty percent of the remaining moneys
must be allocated through the grant process described in (b)(ii)(A) of
this subsection.
(iii) Beginning July 1, 2011, forty percent of the remaining moneys
must be allocated through the grant process to local governments for
retrofit projects that address contamination of storm water, or
projects that directly reduce toxic diesel emissions that result in air
deposition of storm water pollutants. The moneys for retrofit projects
must be prioritized for projects that utilize low-impact development
retrofit strategies, but moneys may be awarded for other retrofit
projects if the site does not lend itself to low-impact development
techniques or other retrofit techniques that are shown to be more
effective in terms of addressing water quality problems associated with
the site.
(iv) Beginning July 1, 2011, ten percent of the remaining moneys
must be allocated through either existing storm water grant programs or
the grant process to projects under (b)(i) or (ii) of this subsection
and to the highest priority projects based upon ecological and water
quality benefits determined by the department. For projects qualifying
under this subsection, moneys may be allocated to meet the matching
requirements under (b)(i) of this subsection to jurisdictions that
demonstrate economic hardship in meeting the matching requirement.
(3) In consultation with stakeholders, the department must develop
criteria for administering the program and ranking projects for funding
based on water quality benefits. In developing criteria applicable to
projects in the Puget Sound basin, the department must consult with the
Puget Sound partnership. Consistent with RCW 90.71.340, when making
grants under this section that contribute to Puget Sound protection and
recovery, the department must consult with the Puget Sound partnership
to ensure that grants are for projects and activities that are
consistent with the prioritization of the 2020 action agenda. All
activities or capital projects approved for funding must demonstrate
the potential to achieve clear ecological or water quality benefits.
The department must endeavor to distribute the moneys within each
geographic region of the state in proportion to the severity of impacts
to waterways from storm water pollution.
(4) The department must initiate the grant application process by
July 1, 2010.
(5) The ecosystem coordination board of the Puget Sound partnership
must conduct a regular review of environmental outcomes derived from
projects in the Puget Sound basin that have been funded under this
section and must recommend, as necessary, actions to improve
environmental benefits of the program in the Puget Sound basin.
(6) By December 1, 2013, and every two years thereafter, the
department must report to the governor and the appropriate committees
of the legislature on the progress of the program and the suitability
of the percentage allocations specified in subsection (2)(b) of this
section.
(7) The definitions in this section apply throughout this section
unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(a) "Department" means the department of ecology.
(b) "Low-impact development" means a storm water management and
land use strategy applied, where feasible, at the parcel and
subdivision, or drainage area, level that emphasizes conservation and
use of on-site natural features integrated with engineered, small-scale
hydrologic controls to more closely mimic predevelopment hydrologic
functions.
(c) "Retrofit" means the renovation of existing development to
improve or eliminate storm water problems associated with the site or
drainage area.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6 A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The water quality action account is created in the state
treasury. Any moneys in the water quality action account are allocated
to the department of ecology and may be spent only after appropriation.
The account may not be used to fund specific state activities that are
required to be funded through fees paid by state and federal water
quality permittees.
(2) Moneys in the water quality action account may be used only for
state responsibilities to carry out the purposes of this chapter to:
Prevent pollution of streams, rivers, aquifers, marine receiving
waters, and drinking water; prevent beach and shellfish bed closures
due to polluted surface runoff; and protect fish and wildlife habitat
from polluted surface runoff. More specifically, moneys may be used
for, but not limited to, the following purposes:
(a) Creation and maintenance of a storm water technology center to
assist businesses and governmental entities by developing resources for
testing, monitoring, adopting, and implementing new clean water
practices and technologies;
(b) Improved storm water research, data management, and monitoring;
(c) Development of clean water guidance and best management
practices for nonpermitted surface runoff activities; and
(d) Improved source control actions, such as collaboration with
local governments to provide local source control inspectors.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 90.71 RCW
to read as follows:
Consistent with RCW 90.71.340, the Puget Sound partnership must use
any money deposited in the Puget Sound recovery account from the clean
water legacy fund to fund activities or capital projects that are
consistent with the prioritization of the 2020 action agenda.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The multidisciplinary college of the environment at the
University of Washington must develop by November 1, 2010, a plan to
establish and maintain within the resources appropriated in the omnibus
operating and capital appropriation acts the research monitoring and
assessment capabilities needed to assure that funded projects are
delivering systemic ecological and economic benefits.
(2) By November 1, 2010, the department, in coordination with the
Puget Sound partnership must convene a broad stakeholder engagement
process that includes local government, environmental organizations,
research organizations, and businesses. Building on the planning of
the Puget Sound partnership and the research and assessment plan
developed by the University of Washington college of the environment,
the goal of this process is to develop recommendations for a continued,
comprehensive and broad-based approach to funding storm water
management and cleanup, including identification of all local, state,
and federal resources that are available for this purpose which may be
considered by the legislature.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9 A new section is added to chapter 82.21 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) Subject to the conditions and limitations in this section, a
motor carrier may request a refund of the tax imposed under RCW
82.21.030(1)(b) with respect to motor vehicle fuel and special fuel
purchased by the motor carrier for use in the fuel tanks of the motor
carrier's commercial motor vehicles. A motor carrier is entitled to a
refund under this section regardless of whether the tax has been paid
by the motor carrier directly to the department on the possession of
motor vehicle fuel or special fuel in this state or indirectly through
the purchase of motor vehicle fuel or special fuel that is subject to
the tax imposed in this chapter.
(2)(a) For motor vehicle fuel or special fuel for which the motor
carrier indirectly paid the tax imposed under RCW 82.21.030(1)(b), the
amount of the refund is determined by dividing the average annual
wholesale price of the motor vehicle fuel or special fuel, as the case
may be, by the average annual retail price of motor vehicle fuel or
special fuel, as the case may be, then multiplying the quotient by the
tax rate in RCW 82.21.030(1)(b) expressed as a decimal, then
multiplying the product by the actual price paid by the motor carrier
for the motor vehicle fuel and special fuel. For the purpose of this
subsection, the average wholesale and retail prices of motor vehicle
fuel and special fuel are based on average wholesale and retail prices
for gasoline, in the case of motor vehicle fuel, and diesel fuel, in
the case of special fuel, determined for this state by the United
States energy information administration of the United States
department of energy for the most recent twelve consecutive month
period published as of January 1st of the year during which application
for refund under this section is made. The department of revenue must
use the same consecutive twelve-month period to determine the average
wholesale and retail prices of motor vehicle fuel and special fuel.
(b) Where the motor carrier has paid the tax imposed in RCW
82.21.030(1)(b) on the possession of motor vehicle fuel and special
fuel in this state, the amount of the refund is the amount of such tax
actually paid.
(3)(a) Beginning January 1, 2011, a motor carrier may request a
refund from the department during any calendar year for the tax imposed
under this chapter on motor vehicle fuel and special fuel purchased by
the motor carrier during the immediately preceding calendar year only.
Refunds requested during calendar year 2011 are limited to the tax
imposed in RCW 82.21.030(1)(b) and paid directly or indirectly on motor
vehicle fuel or special fuel purchased on or after the effective date
of this section. The department must rule on requests within sixty
days of receipt.
(b) The refund request, including documentation and information
required by the department, must be made using an electronic
application process as prescribed by the department. Only one
remittance request may be made by a motor carrier in a calendar year.
(c) An application for refund of the tax imposed under RCW
82.21.030(1)(b) must be made by December 31st for taxes imposed in RCW
82.21.030(1)(b) on motor vehicle fuel and special fuel purchased by the
motor carrier in the preceding calendar year.
(d) The total amount of a refund request must be at least twenty-five dollars. The department must deny any request for a refund that
is less than twenty-five dollars.
(e) A motor carrier who requests a refund under this section must,
when requested, grant the department of revenue access to the records
of the motor carrier necessary to verify entitlement to and the proper
amount of a refund under this section.
(4) Amounts refunded under this section must be disbursed from the
clean water legacy account created in the state treasury in RCW
82.21.010. The following definitions apply throughout this section
unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(a) "Commercial motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle or combination
of motor vehicles used in commerce exclusively to transport property
for hire if the motor vehicle:
(i) Has a gross vehicle weight rating of twenty-six thousand one
pounds or more (eleven thousand seven hundred ninety-four kilograms or
more) inclusive of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating of
ten thousand pounds or more (four thousand five hundred thirty-six
kilograms or more); or
(ii) Has a gross vehicle weight rating of twenty-six thousand one
pounds or more (eleven thousand seven hundred ninety-four kilograms or
more).
(b) "Motor carrier" means any person who engages in the business of
transporting property for hire.
(c) "Motor vehicle fuel" has the same meaning as provided in RCW
82.36.010.
(d) "Special fuel" has the same meaning as provided in RCW
82.38.020.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10 If any provision of this act or its
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other
persons or circumstances is not affected.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11 This act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the
state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect
May 1, 2010."
Correct the title.
EFFECT: Replaces the annual 0.1 percent tax increase with a 0.85
percent tax increase. Changes the export exemption to a credit.
Deposits the entire tax increase into a clean water legacy fund. Adds
back the water quality action account. Removes section that requires
money placed in motor vehicle account from the clean water legacy fund
to be used for storm water related activities.
Requires the ecosystem coordination board to conduct a regular
review of outcomes of projects funded through the storm water account.
Requires any money deposited in the forest and fish support account
from the clean water legacy fund to be used for the state's
implementation of the forests and fish report and related activities.
Allows motor carriers to seek a refund for the additional hazardous
substance tax paid on motor vehicle fuel and special fuel.
Requires the multidisciplinary college of the environment at the
University of Washington to develop by November 1, 2010, a plan to
establish and maintain within the resources appropriated in the omnibus
operating and capital appropriation acts the research monitoring and
assessment capabilities needed to assure that funded projects are
delivering systemic ecological and economic benefits.
Requires DOE, in coordination with the Puget Sound partnership, to
convene a broad stakeholder engagement process to develop
recommendations for a continued, comprehensive and broad-based approach
to funding storm water management and cleanup.