E2SSB 5735 -
By Representative Upthegrove
NOT CONSIDERED 04/26/2009
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1
The legislature finds that by continuing its participation in the
development of federal and regional programs to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, Washington maximizes its ability to influence and shape
those programs so that they may reflect Washington's emissions
portfolio, including the state's hydroelectric system, aid Washington's
forest resources and agricultural industries, reduce Washington's
expenditures on imported fuels, and create a strong economy.
The legislature further finds that by continuing Washington's
participation in the development of federal and regional programs to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Washington has the opportunity to
protect Washington families and small businesses from undue financial
impacts arising from the transition to a clean energy future, to
protect Washington's economy from disadvantages resulting from
competition with industries that do not participate in carbon control
efforts, and provide appropriate credit for those businesses that have
taken early actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The legislature further finds that well-designed climate policies
should mitigate any impacts on the cost and affordability of food,
housing, energy, transportation, and other routine expenses on low and
moderate-income people, and ensure that economic benefits are available
to both urban and rural communities, and to traditionally underserved
communities.
The legislature further finds the continued efforts to reduce
greenhouse gases in the transportation sector through the continued
development of alternative fuels, improved vehicle technologies, and
providing choices that reduce overall vehicle miles traveled to be
critical steps in creating jobs, fostering economic growth, and
reducing our reliance on foreign petroleum-based transportation fuels.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2
(2) In order to provide needed information to the legislature,
government agencies, and those persons who are responsible for
significant emissions of greenhouse gases so that they may effectively
plan for the long-term emissions reductions under RCW 70.235.020, the
department shall develop:
(a) Its best estimate of emissions levels in 2012 for persons that
the department reasonably believes are responsible for the emission of
twenty-five thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent or
greater each year; and
(b) The trajectory of emissions reductions necessary to meet the
2020 requirement of reducing the state's greenhouse gas emissions to
1990 levels.
(3) The department shall develop the estimated 2012 emissions
levels and the 2020 reduction trajectories in consultation with
business and other interested stakeholders by February 15, 2010. The
reduction trajectories must reflect the department's best estimate of
each person's proportionate share of the 2020 reductions.
(4) The department shall provide each person with its estimate of
the person's 2012 emissions levels and the 2020 reduction trajectory as
soon as they are available, but no later than February 15, 2010. Each
person or groups of persons representing a sector of Washington's
economy may recommend strategies or actions to the department that they
believe would achieve the needed reductions. The recommendations must
be provided to the department by July 15, 2010.
(5) The department shall provide a report to the legislature by
December 31, 2010, that includes the 2012 emissions estimates, the 2020
reduction trajectories, and the strategies and actions, including
complementary policies that collectively will achieve the state's 2020
emissions reduction in RCW 70.235.020. The 2020 reduction trajectories
must consider each person's use of industry best practices and of fuels
that are either carbon neutral or that do not emit greenhouse gases.
Consideration may be given to industries whose processes are inherently
energy intensive. The report must include a description of any
additional authority that is needed to implement the identified
strategies or actions. The report must also include an assessment of
the state's emission sources and sectors where emissions reductions
cannot be realized and the sources or sectors are necessary to ensure
the economic viability of the state.
(6) For purposes of this section, emissions of carbon dioxide from
industrial combustion of biomass in the form of fuel wood, wood waste,
wood byproducts, including pulping liquor, and wood residuals may not
be considered a greenhouse gas as long as the region's silvicultural
sequestration capacity is maintained or increased.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4
(2) The department shall develop state policies for:
(a) Forestry offset projects within Washington in consultation with
the department of natural resources and the forest carbon working
group; and
(b) Agriculture offset projects in consultation with Washington
State University, the department of agriculture, and the agriculture
carbon working group.
(3) In developing the forestry offset project policy under
subsection (2)(a) of this section, the agencies and the forest carbon
working group shall use the 2008 report of the forest carbon working
group as the starting point and should consider:
(a) Specific standards and guidelines that will support carbon
accounting in managed forests participating in an offset program;
(b) Recognition of management activities that increase carbon
stocks including, but not limited to, thinning, lengthening rotations,
increased retention of trees after harvest, fertilization, genetics,
timber stand improvement, fire management, and specific site class and
productivity of a managed forest;
(c) Specific standards and guidelines to support wood products
accounting, recognizing that carbon is stored in products after trees
are harvested, including the use of the one hundred year method which
estimates the amount of carbon stored in the wood products that are
projected to remain in use after one hundred years;
(d) Guidelines on how transfer of development right projects and
other land use and urban forestry techniques that reduce the loss of
forests may be used to create forestry offset projects;
(e) Guidelines on how forestry offset projects and forestry
financial incentive programs can work together so that Washington's
forest landowners will not be disadvantaged in comparison to other
jurisdictions participating in a national or regional cap and trade
program;
(f) How to verify or certify carbon stocks in a manner that will
not be administratively burdensome; and
(g) Specific standards for how landowners that are no longer able
or willing to meet their offset obligations may opt out of the program.
Such a mechanism must require the landowner to procure other allowances
or offsets equal to the offsets issued under the management plan for
any offsets they have sold and surrender those offsets, and any unsold
offsets, to the state.
(4) In developing the agricultural offset project policy under
subsection (2)(b) of this section, the agencies and the agriculture
carbon working group should consider:
(a) A process and timeline to survey, catalog, and map Washington
soils in a manner that describes the carbon soil sequestration level of
the soils; and
(b) Activities that would increase carbon sequestration in soils
and therefore potentially qualify as offset projects.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5
(1) Thinning, lengthening of rotations, increased retention of
trees at harvest, fertilization, genetics, timber stand improvement,
and fire management;
(2) Production of wood products while maintaining or increasing
carbon stocks on the ground; and
(3) Retention of high carbon stocks where there is no obligation to
retain such stocks.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6 A new section is added to chapter 70.94 RCW
to read as follows:
(2) Coal-fired power plants must meet the greenhouse gas emissions
performance standards under RCW 80.80.040(1) by December 31, 2025.
(3) The state shall not require early or additional reductions of
greenhouse gas emissions for coal-fired power plants except as may be
required for these plants under a federal program or unless they become
the subject of long-term financial commitments as provided in RCW
80.80.040(2).
(4) If a coal-fired power plant reduces its total annual greenhouse
gas emissions below the plant's baseline emissions before the effective
date of any future requirement to reduce emissions, including the
requirement in subsection (2) of this section, the state shall advocate
for appropriate early action credit under future climate change
programs that require reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from the
plants.
(5) For purposes of subsection (4) of this section, the baseline
emissions for a coal-fired power plant is the plant's total annual
emissions of greenhouse gases in calendar year 2005. The baseline
emissions established in this subsection does not set nor otherwise
create a precedent for establishing baseline emissions for any other
sector or person subject to any future requirement to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 47.38 RCW
to read as follows:
(2) To the extent permitted under federal programs, rules, or law,
the department of transportation shall pursue partnership agreements
with other public and private entities for the use of land and
facilities along state routes and within interstate highway rights-of-way for an alternative fuels corridor pilot project. The department of
transportation shall strive to have the partnership agreement in place
by June 30, 2010. At a minimum, the pilot project must:
(a) Limit renewable fuel and vehicle technology offerings to those
with a forecasted demand over the next fifteen years and approved by
the department of transportation;
(b) Ensure that a pilot project site does not compete with existing
retail businesses in the same geographic area for the provision of the
same refueling services, recharging technologies, or other retail
commercial activities;
(c) Provide existing truck stop operators and retail truck
refueling businesses with an absolute right of first refusal over the
offering of refueling and recharging services to class six trucks with
a maximum gross vehicle weight of twenty-six thousand pounds within the
same geographic area identified for a possible pilot project site;
(d) Reach agreement with the department of services for the blind
ensuring that any activities at host sites do not materially affect the
revenues forecasted from their vending operations at each site;
(e) Regulate the internal rate of return from the partnership,
including provisions to reduce or eliminate the level of state support
once the partnership attains economic self-sufficiency;
(f) Be limited to not more than five locations on state-owned land
within federal interstate rights-of-way or state highway rights-of-way
in Washington; and
(g) Be limited in duration to a term of years reasonably necessary
for the partnership to recover the cost of capital investments, plus
the regulated internal rate of return.
(3) The department of transportation is not responsible for
providing capital equipment or operating refueling or recharging
services. The department of transportation must provide periodic
status reports on the pilot project to the office of financial
management and the relevant standing committees of the legislature at
least every biennium.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 A new section is added to chapter 43.19 RCW
to read as follows:
(2) The project should be developed in collaboration with
representatives of Oregon and California, the federal government, and
the private sector, as appropriate.
(3) The state shall seek federal funds for purchasing electric
vehicles and the installation of public infrastructure for electric and
other high-efficiency, zero or low-carbon vehicles. The department of
ecology shall also seek funds to expand the network of truck stop
electrification facilities and port electrification facilities.
Sec. 9 RCW 47.80.030 and 2005 c 328 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Each regional transportation planning organization shall
develop in cooperation with the department of transportation, providers
of public transportation and high capacity transportation, ports, and
local governments within the region, adopt, and periodically update a
regional transportation plan that:
(a) Is based on a ((least cost)) planning methodology that
identifies the most cost-effective facilities, services, and programs;
(b) Identifies existing or planned transportation facilities,
services, and programs, including but not limited to major roadways
including state highways and regional arterials, transit and
nonmotorized services and facilities, multimodal and intermodal
facilities, marine ports and airports, railroads, and noncapital
programs including transportation demand management that should
function as an integrated regional transportation system, giving
emphasis to those facilities, services, and programs that exhibit one
or more of the following characteristics:
(i) Crosses member county lines;
(ii) Is or will be used by a significant number of people who live
or work outside the county in which the facility, service, or project
is located;
(iii) Significant impacts are expected to be felt in more than one
county;
(iv) Potentially adverse impacts of the facility, service, program,
or project can be better avoided or mitigated through adherence to
regional policies;
(v) Transportation needs addressed by a project have been
identified by the regional transportation planning process and the
remedy is deemed to have regional significance; and
(vi) Provides for system continuity;
(c) Establishes level of service standards for state highways and
state ferry routes, with the exception of transportation facilities of
statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140. These regionally
established level of service standards for state highways and state
ferries shall be developed jointly with the department of
transportation, to encourage consistency across jurisdictions. In
establishing level of service standards for state highways and state
ferries, consideration shall be given for the necessary balance between
providing for the free interjurisdictional movement of people and goods
and the needs of local commuters using state facilities;
(d) Includes a financial plan demonstrating how the regional
transportation plan can be implemented, indicating resources from
public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made
available to carry out the plan, and recommending any innovative
financing techniques to finance needed facilities, services, and
programs;
(e) Assesses regional development patterns, capital investment and
other measures necessary to:
(i) Ensure the preservation of the existing regional transportation
system, including requirements for operational improvements,
resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of existing and future
major roadways, as well as operations, maintenance, modernization, and
rehabilitation of existing and future transit, railroad systems and
corridors, and nonmotorized facilities; and
(ii) Make the most efficient use of existing transportation
facilities to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the mobility of
people and goods;
(f) Sets forth a proposed regional transportation approach,
including capital investments, service improvements, programs, and
transportation demand management measures to guide the development of
the integrated, multimodal regional transportation system. For
regional growth centers, the approach must address transportation
concurrency strategies required under RCW 36.70A.070 and include a
measurement of vehicle level of service for off-peak periods and total
multimodal capacity for peak periods; and
(g) Where appropriate, sets forth the relationship of high capacity
transportation providers and other public transit providers with regard
to responsibility for, and the coordination between, services and
facilities.
(2) Beginning December 1, 2011, regional transportation planning
organizations that encompass at least one county planning under RCW
36.70A.040 with a population greater than two hundred forty-five
thousand must adopt a regional transportation plan that, when
implemented, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, including achieving the
benchmarks under RCW 47.01.440 to reduce annual per capita vehicle
miles traveled in those counties. In the case of a county with a
population greater than two hundred forty-five thousand that is a
member of more than one regional transportation planning organization,
the regional transportation planning organization with the larger
overall population must carry out the requirements of this subsection.
(3) The organization shall review the regional transportation plan
biennially for currency and forward the adopted plan along with
documentation of the biennial review to the state department of
transportation.
(((3))) (4) All transportation projects, programs, and
transportation demand management measures within the region that have
an impact upon regional facilities or services must be consistent with
the plan and with the adopted regional growth and transportation
strategies.
(5)(a) The department of ecology, in cooperation with the
Washington department of transportation, shall convene a stakeholder
group comprised of legislators from the largest two caucuses of both
houses of the legislature, cities, counties, regional transportation
planning organizations, business, and environmental representatives for
the purposes of continuing the work of the transportation
implementation working group in developing alternatives necessary to
meet the overall state greenhouse gas emissions reductions established
in RCW 70.235.020 from the transportation sector.
(b) The members of the legislature serving on the stakeholder group
in (a) of this subsection shall be appointed by the speaker of the
house of representatives and the president of the senate.
(6) The Washington department of transportation shall report to the
legislature by September 30, 2010, with findings on recent trends in
levels of vehicle miles traveled statewide and projections of future
trends; what additional strategies should be considered in reducing
emissions from the transportation sector, including policies that will
reduce vehicle miles traveled, including strategies to address low and
no-emission vehicles; and determination of the probable environmental
and economic costs and benefits to the state and its citizens from the
reduction of vehicle miles traveled in implementation of policies
designed to meet the goals of RCW 47.01.440.
Sec. 10 RCW 43.19.648 and 2007 c 348 s 202 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) ((Effective)) By June 1, 2015, all state agencies and local
government subdivisions of the state, to the extent determined
practicable by the rules adopted by the department of community, trade,
and economic development pursuant to RCW 43.325.080, are required to
satisfy one hundred percent of their fuel usage for operating publicly
owned vessels, vehicles, and construction equipment from electricity or
biofuel.
(2) The department of general administration is directed to work
with California, Oregon, other states, federal agencies, local
governments, and private fleet owners to encourage aggregate purchasing
of electric vehicles to the maximum extent possible.
(3) Except for cars owned or operated by the Washington state
patrol, when tires on vehicles in the state's motor vehicle fleet are
replaced, they must be replaced with tires that have the same or better
rolling resistance as the original tires.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11
(2) Nothing in this section is intended to expand state authority
over Indian country as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1151.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12 Captions used in this act are not any part
of the law.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 13 Sections 1 through 4 and 11 of this act are
each added to chapter
NEW SECTION. Sec. 14 If any provision of this act or its
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other
persons or circumstances is not affected."
Correct the title.