SB 6853 -
By Senator Rockefeller
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 This act shall be known and cited as the
accountability for tax preferences act of 2010.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 For the purposes of this act, "tax
preference" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 43.136.021.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 The legislature finds that properly designed
and justified tax preferences may be an effective method of allocating
state resources to fulfill public objectives for job, community, and
economic development. However, the legislature also recognizes that
tax preferences can become tools for tax avoidance or preferential
treatment that puts the burden of paying for common government services
and functions disproportionately on nonfavored taxpayers. Therefore,
clear performance measures must be established to ensure that they are
providing value to the citizens of the state and carefully evaluated
before and after being enacted. The legislature finds that the tax
structure works best when it is fair and equitable to everyone and the
burden of proof that a tax preference is warranted is on those
receiving the direct benefit of the preference. The legislature finds
that tax preferences should be regularly reviewed in an open and
transparent manner and require a positive action by the legislature for
continuation. It is the intent of the legislature that a process be
established to review and evaluate tax preferences equivalent to the
review of proposed expenditures for other public benefits, services, or
programs.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 44.04 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) Any legislation that creates, modifies, or extends a tax
preference should include the following provisions:
(a) An intent statement that clearly provides the rationale and
purpose for the tax preference, against which its effectiveness can be
measured;
(b) A reporting requirement for beneficiaries, if the legislature
determines reporting will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of
the tax preference;
(c) A requirement that the grant, renewal, continuance, or benefit
of any tax preference provided under this chapter is conditioned upon
full compliance with any reporting requirement;
(d) To ensure greater transparency, a requirement that the
recipient of any tax preference must provide the dollar amount of the
tax savings obtained as a result of the tax preference. Unless the
legislature has set forth, with particularity, the justification for
not providing such information, the information must be provided by the
recipient (i) upon request of the legislature or department of revenue
and (ii) in any report that the recipient is required to complete to
obtain the tax preference; and
(e) An expiration date that is no later than five years after the
enactment of the preference.
(2) In determining whether to create, modify, or extend a tax
preference, the legislature should consider those factors contained in
RCW 43.136.055, and may consider additional factors such as those
recommended by the citizen commission for performance measurement of
tax preferences under section 6 of this act.
Sec. 5 RCW 43.136.035 and 2006 c 197 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The citizen commission for performance measurement of tax
preferences is created.
(2) The commission has ((seven)) nine members as follows:
(a) One member is the state auditor, who is a nonvoting member;
(b) One member is the state treasurer, who is a nonvoting member;
(c) One member is the chair of the joint legislative audit and
review committee, who is a nonvoting member;
(((c))) (d) The chair of each of the two largest caucuses of the
senate and the two largest caucuses of the house of representatives
((shall)) must each appoint a member. None of these appointees may be
members of the legislature; and
(((d))) (e) The governor ((shall)) must select the ((seventh
member)) eighth and ninth members, at least one of whom must be a
citizen representing working families or a nonprofit organization.
(3) Persons appointed by the caucus chairs should be individuals
who ((represent a balance of perspectives and constituencies, and))
have a basic understanding of state tax policy, government operations,
and public services. ((These appointees should have knowledge and
expertise in performance management, fiscal analysis, strategic
planning, economic development, performance assessments, or closely
related fields.))
(4) The commission ((shall)) must elect a chair from among its
voting or nonvoting members. Decisions of the commission must be made
using the sufficient consensus model. For the purposes of this
subsection, "sufficient consensus" means the point at which the vast
majority of the commission favors taking a particular action. If the
commission determines that sufficient consensus cannot be reached, a
vote must be taken. The commission must allow a minority report to be
included with a decision of the commission, if requested by a member of
the commission.
(5) Members serve for terms of four years, with the terms expiring
on June 30th on the fourth year of the term. However, in the case of
the initial terms, the members appointed by the chairs of senate
caucuses ((shall)) must serve four-year terms, the members appointed by
the chairs of house of representatives caucuses ((shall)) must serve
three-year terms, and the member appointed by the governor ((shall))
must serve a two-year term, with each of the terms expiring on June
30th of the applicable year. Appointees may be reappointed to serve
more than one term.
(6) The joint legislative audit and review committee ((shall)) must
provide clerical, technical, and management personnel to the commission
to serve as the commission's staff. The department of revenue
((shall)) must provide necessary support and information to the joint
legislative audit and review committee.
(7) The commission ((shall)) must meet at least once a quarter and
may hold additional meetings at the call of the chair or by a majority
vote of the members of the commission. The members of the commission
((shall)) must be compensated in accordance with RCW 43.03.220 and
reimbursed for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and
43.03.060.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6 A new section is added to chapter 43.136 RCW
to read as follows:
The citizen commission may recommend to the fiscal committees of
the legislature additional factors that it determines may be applicable
or appropriate to consider in review of tax preferences, including
factors such as the following:
(1) The positive and negative impacts of the preference on the
taxpayer or taxpayers receiving the preference if the preference is
continued;
(2) The effective state tax rate of the beneficiary taxpayer or
taxpayers before and after the preference;
(3) The economic development impacts of the preference, including
any demonstrated multiplier effect and demonstrated impact on jobs,
wages, and benefits;
(4) The federal income tax benefits generally available under
current federal law to businesses engaged in activities comparable to
the activities of the beneficiary taxpayer or taxpayers;
(5) The availability of other tax benefits for the beneficiary
taxpayers under state law and the cumulative fiscal effects of such
benefits;
(6) If the beneficiary taxpayer is a nonprofit or public
institution, comparisons of those activities to private activity and if
so, the comparable tax burden between the two;
(7) A comparison of the preference with tax treatment of taxpayers
engaged in similar activities in neighboring states; and
(8) Consideration of the probable impact on overall uniformity and
fairness of the tax code.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 44.04 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) To the maximum extent possible, the legislature must evaluate
existing tax preferences in the year subsequent to the year in which
the tax preference is reviewed and findings or recommendations are
reported by the citizen commission on the performance measurement of
tax preferences.
(2) The legislature may use the citizen commission's
recommendations and review as part of its own review and analysis.
Each tax preference must be considered as if it were included as an
expenditure in the appropriate category of budget expenditures.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 A new section is added to chapter 43.88 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) When the governor submits a budget, revenue, or policy proposal
that includes a new, modified, or extended tax preference, there must
be a recommended expiration date for the tax preference, a statement of
the anticipated and particular beneficiaries and benefits, a
recommendation of proposed methods for measurement and review of the
effectiveness of such tax preference, and a recommendation of existing
tax preferences that should be discontinued or modified sufficient to
fully offset the costs of the new, modified, or extended tax preference
during any biennium during which the new, modified, or extended tax
preference is in effect.
(2) With each budget required to be submitted by the governor
pursuant to this chapter, there must also be a recommendation submitted
by the governor which describes the aggregate cost and expected
benefits of all proposals submitted with such budget for tax preference
modification or extension, a statement of the manner in which such
proposals are intended to achieve economic development and job
creation, and a recommendation of the maximum amount which, in the
judgment of the governor, should be expended in each future biennium in
support of such proposals.
Sec. 9 RCW 43.06.400 and 1999 c 372 s 5 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Beginning in January 1984, and in January of every ((fourth))
second year thereafter, the department of revenue ((shall)) must submit
to the legislature prior to the regular session a listing of the amount
of reduction for the current and next biennium in the revenues of the
state or the revenues of local government collected by the state as a
result of tax exemptions. The listing ((shall)) must include an
estimate of the revenue lost from the tax exemption, the purpose of the
tax exemption, the persons, organizations, or parts of the population
which benefit from the tax exemption, and whether or not the tax
exemption conflicts with another state program. The listing ((shall))
must include but not be limited to the following revenue sources:
(((1))) (a) Real and personal property tax exemptions under Title
84 RCW;
(((2))) (b) Business and occupation tax exemptions, deductions, and
credits under chapter 82.04 RCW;
(((3))) (c) Retail sales and use tax exemptions under chapters
82.08, 82.12, and 82.14 RCW;
(((4))) (d) Public utility tax exemptions and deductions under
chapter 82.16 RCW;
(((5))) (e) Food fish and shellfish tax exemptions under chapter
82.27 RCW;
(((6))) (f) Leasehold excise tax exemptions under chapter 82.29A
RCW;
(((7))) (g) Motor vehicle and special fuel tax exemptions and
refunds under chapters 82.36 and 82.38 RCW;
(((8))) (h) Aircraft fuel tax exemptions under chapter 82.42 RCW;
(((9))) (i) Motor vehicle excise tax exclusions under chapter 82.44
RCW; and
(((10))) (j) Insurance premiums tax exemptions under chapter 48.14
RCW.
(2) The department of revenue ((shall)) must prepare the listing
required by this section with the assistance of any other agencies or
departments as may be required.
(3) The department of revenue ((shall)) must present the listing to
the ways and means committees of each house in public hearings.
((Beginning in January 1984, and)) (4) Every ((four)) two years
((thereafter)) the governor is requested to review the report from the
department of revenue and may submit recommendations to the legislature
with respect to the repeal ((or)), modification, or extension of any
tax exemption. The ways and means committees of each house and the
appropriate standing committee of each house ((shall)) must hold public
hearings and take appropriate action on the recommendations submitted
by the governor.
(5) As used in this section, "tax exemption" means an exemption,
exclusion, or deduction from the base of a tax; a credit against a tax;
a deferral of a tax; or a preferential tax rate."
SB 6853 -
By Senator
On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "2010" strike the remainder of the title and insert "; amending RCW 43.136.035 and 43.06.400; adding new sections to chapter 44.04 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.136 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.88 RCW; and creating new sections."
EFFECT: Establishes the intent of the legislature that tax preferences be reviewed in the same manner as budget expenditures. Sets standards for what should be considered in future tax preference legislation. Increases the makeup of the Citizen Commission on the Performance Review of Tax measures. Requires the Governor, when submitting tax preference requests to the legislature, to offset the cost of any preferences by reductions or eliminations of existing preferences. Requires the department of revenue to provide the tax exemption report every two years rather than every four years.