HOUSE BILL REPORT

2SHB 2623

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Judiciary. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Darneille, Chair; Takko, Vice Chair; McCune, Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Dunshee, Hudgins, Kenney, Klippert, Pedersen, Sells, Short, Van De Wege and Williams.

Background:

A deed of trust is a type of security interest in real property. A deed of trust is essentially a three-party mortgage. The borrower (grantor) grants a deed creating a lien on the real property to a third party (the trustee) who holds the deed in trust as security for an obligation due to the lender (the beneficiary).

Unlike mortgages, which require judicial foreclosure, deeds of trust may be non-judicially foreclosed if the borrower defaults on the loan obligation. To initiate foreclosure procedures the trustee must, among other things, file a notice of trustee's sale 90 days before the sale. The notice is recorded in the county auditor's office. A sale may not take place less than 190 days from the date of default.

Last year, the Legislature enacted Engrossed Senate Bill (ESB) 5810 which added a "meet and confer" requirement for deeds of trust made from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, on owner-occupied residential property. Under ESB 5810, a beneficiary cannot issue a notice of default until 30 days after the beneficiary contacts the borrower to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. During this initial contact, the beneficiary must, among other things, give the borrower contact information for a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-certified counseling agency and other places that might be able to assist the borrower. This "meet and confer" requirement expires on December 31, 2012.

Summary of Second Substitute Bill:

Washington State Housing Finance Commission (Commission) must conduct a review of the effectiveness of the "meet and confer" requirement and examine whether it has resulted in an increase in the number of loan modifications and whether additional statutory provisions, such as mandatory mediation, are necessary to produce effective communication between lenders and borrowers.

The Commission must report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature by November 30, 2010.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Judiciary):

(In support of proposed substitute) The economy is still struggling, there is record high unemployment, and a huge increase in foreclosures. People are having a difficult time navigating through the banking system. The role of the state is to help in these types of situations. The bill is meant to help families who have been in their homes for a long time. The bill will buy extra time for homeowners to catch up and for lenders to reach out. It will help stabilize neighborhoods. Homeowners who are being foreclosed now are those with good credit and who have long-standing histories of payments. Every foreclosure costs the public money. A forbearance should not cause the banks more disruption than a foreclosure does. Housing counselors need more resources. They help facilitate communication between the lender and borrower. Over 1,000 families could be helped by the appropriation in the proposed substitute for housing counselors.

(Opposed) The mechanism in the bill to connect unemployment with forbearance will have a grave effect on the stability of community banks and will impact the ability of lenders to give credit to consumers. This will have a chilling effect on the ability of lenders to make loans to first-time homebuyers. Most banks want to work with the homeowners and do not want to foreclose on homes. The bill will bring uncertainty to the current and future lending market. The bill would make a sale void if it violates the provision of the bill, and that would mean nobody can buy the home. A purchaser needs to know that they will get title to the property.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony (General Government Appropriations):

(In support) One-third of the homes in the U.S. are occupied by people in "underwater" mortgages, where the owners owe more than the value of their homes. This bill helps people stay in their homes. This bill started out in an effort to change the foreclosure process in Washington. This bill helps continue the dialogue on the residential loan crisis.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying (Judiciary): (In support of proposed substitute) Representative Orwall, prime sponsor; Velma Veloria, Homesight; Mark Ellenbrook, Seattle Office of Housing; Alex Kamaunu, Family Finance Resource Center; Kim Hermann, Washington State Housing Finance Commission; Dusty Hoerler, Gene Judevine, and Kevin Wilder, Washington Local 32; Nick Federici, Washington Low Income Housing Alliance; and Marnie Claywell, Parkview Services.

(Opposed) Brad Tower, Community Bankers of Washington; Mark Minickiello, Washington Credit Union League; Al Ralston, Boeing Employees Credit Union; James McMahan and Marianne Nichols, County Auditors; Denny Eliason, Washington Banker's Association; Greg Pierce, Washington Financial League and Washington Mortgage Lender's Association; and Dwight Bickel, Washington Land Title Association.