HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6214
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Local Government & Housing
General Government Appropriations
Title: An act relating to restructuring three growth management hearings boards into one board.
Brief Description: Restructuring three growth management hearings boards into one board.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Government Operations & Elections (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Morton, Swecker, Shin, McCaslin, Ranker, Rockefeller, Fairley, Pridemore, Kline, Parlette, Jacobsen, Schoesler, Sheldon, McDermott and Fraser; by request of Growth Management Hearings Board).
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Local Government & Housing: 2/22/10 [DPA];
General Government Appropriations: 2/25/10 [DPA(LGH)].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING |
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Nelson, Vice Chair; Miloscia, Springer, Upthegrove, White and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Angel, Ranking Minority Member; DeBolt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Fagan and Short.
Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for county and city governments in Washington. Enacted in 1990 and 1991, the GMA establishes numerous planning requirements for counties and cities obligated by mandate or choice to fully plan under the GMA (planning jurisdictions) and a reduced number of directives for all other counties and cities. Twenty-nine of Washington's 39 counties, and the cities within those counties, are planning jurisdictions.
The GMA establishes three regional Growth Management Hearings Boards (Boards or Regional Boards) with defined geographic jurisdictions: (1) an Eastern Washington Board; (2) a Central Puget Sound Board; and (3) a Western Washington Board. Each Board consists of three gubernatorial appointee members who are qualified by experience or training and who also meet residency requirements. At least one member of each Board must be admitted to practice law in Washington, and at least one member of each Board must have been a city or county elected official. No more than two members of a Board may be from the same political party. Board members serve six-year terms.
Boards have limited jurisdiction and may only hear and determine petitions alleging:
that a state agency or planning jurisdiction is noncompliant with the GMA, specific provisions of the Shoreline Management Act, or certain mandates of the State Environmental Policy Act relating to qualifying plans, regulations, or amendments; or
that the 20-year planning population projections adopted by the Office of Financial Management should be adjusted.
Boards must make findings of fact and prepare a written decision in each decided case. Findings of fact and decisions become effective upon being signed by two or more Board members and upon being filed at the applicable Board office. Final decisions of the Boards may be appealed to the superior court. If all parties agree, the superior court may directly review a petition filed with a Board.
Boards are governed by other statutory requirements for conduct and procedure. For example, a majority of a Board constitutes a quorum for making decisions, adopting rules, and conducting other official business. Additionally, Boards are required to jointly develop and adopt rules of practice and procedure. Boards must also meet jointly at least annually to share information that promotes the goals and purposes of the GMA. Although provisions allowing for the part-time operation of each Board are specified in statute, the three Regional Boards operate on a full-time basis.
In response to budget reductions enacted in Washington's 2009-2011 operating budget, the Boards consolidated their administrative functions and closed their Eastern Washington and Central Puget Sound regional offices in Yakima and Seattle, respectively. The office of the Western Washington Board in Olympia effectively serves as the administrative office of all three Boards. Associated staff reductions also occurred, and one Board member position is vacant.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Amended Bill:
Consolidation and Member Provisions.
The three regional Growth Management Hearings Boards are abolished and consolidated into a single Growth Management Hearings Board (consolidated board). The consolidated board must consist of seven members qualified by experience or training in land use law or planning and must have experience in the practical application of those matters. The members must be appointed by the Governor to six-year terms, with six members from three specified regions of the state: two members each from (1) the Central Puget Sound area, (2) Eastern Washington, and (3) Western Washington. A seventh member must be appointed as an at-large member. At least three members of the consolidated board, one from each region, must be admitted to practice law in the state. Additionally, at least three members of the consolidated board, one from each region, must have been a county or city elected official. After the expiration of the terms of the Board members who serve prior to the consolidation, no more than four members of the consolidated board may be members of the same major political party. No more than two members at the time of their appointment or during their term may reside in the same county.
The members of the three Regional Boards who serve prior to the consolidation will complete their staggered current terms, with the reduction from nine members to seven occurring through attrition, voluntary resignation, or retirement.
Hearing and Adjudication Practices.
Petitions for review that are filed with the consolidated board must be heard and decided by a regional three-member panel, with membership for the regional panels selected from among full membership of the consolidated board. With some exceptions, a majority of the regional panel members selected to hear and decide a case must reside within the region in which the case arose. Except in cases of emergency, the presiding officer in each case must reside within the region in which the case arose. Also, with some exceptions, each regional panel must:
include one member admitted to practice law in Washington;
include one member who has been a city or county elected official; and
reflect the political composition of the consolidated board.
The regional panels are constituted as follows:
A Central Puget Sound regional panel will be selected to hear and decide matters pertaining to the cities and counties in King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap Counties.
An Eastern Washington region panel will be selected to hear and decide matters pertaining to the planning jurisdictions that are east of the crest of the Cascade Mountain Range.
A Western Washington regional panel will be selected to hear and decide matters pertaining to the cities and counties that are west of the crest of the Cascade Mountain Range that are not included within the Central Puget Sound region.
If Skamania County becomes a planning jurisdiction, it may elect to be included in the Western or Eastern Washington regional panel.
Administrative Matters.
The consolidated board must annually elect one of its members to be the administrative officer. The administrative officer is responsible for the administrative, budget, and personnel matters of the consolidated board. The administrative officer is also responsible for making member case assignments, subject to the consolidated board's rules of procedure, for the purpose of achieving a fair and balanced workload among all members.
The reports, files, records, et cetera of the three Regional Boards must be delivered to the consolidated board, the office of which must be in Olympia. Funds, credits, assets, and employees of the Regional Boards are transferred to the consolidated board. Tangible property of the Regional Boards must be made available to the consolidated board. Rules and pending business before the Regional Boards must be continued and acted upon by the consolidated board. The transfer of powers, duties, functions, and personnel of the Regional Boards to the consolidated board does not affect the validity of any act performed before July 1, 2010. All cases decided and all orders previously issued by the Regional Boards remain in full force and effect.
Technical Changes.
Numerous statutory references to multiple Boards are changed to reflect a single consolidated board. Provisions pertaining to the part-time operations of the Regional Boards are deleted.
Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:
The amended act makes the following changes to the original bill:
specifies that members of the consolidated board must have experience in the practical application of land use law or land use planning;
deletes a provision that permits members of the consolidated board to have experience in city or county planning rather than having been a city or county elected official; and
deletes a provision that permits members of the consolidated board who are serving on regional panels to have experience in city or county planning rather than having been a city or county elected official.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: This bill takes effect on July 1, 2010.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) None.
(In support with concerns) The funding for the Regional Boards has been reduced and there is a vacancy in the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (CPSGMHB). The Board met with stakeholders and developed the member, Board, and office reductions proposed in the bill. This bill will save $220,000 per year. The amendment proposed by Representative Nelson is supported, but the other amendments have not been fully reviewed and cannot be supported at this time. Without the bill, a split decision may occur in the CPSGMHB; this may result in a city or county winning a decision, but it will not be a full resolution as the local government will not win on the merits of the case. Additionally, without this bill, the Boards must find additional funds and must operate under current statutory requirements.
Concerns exist about the underlying Senate language and member eligibility criteria that would permit experience in city or county planning to substitute for experience as a city or county elected official. Elected official perspectives are valuable and should be required for serving on the Board.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Nina Carter, Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board; Dave Earling, Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board; Josh Weiss, Washington State Association of Counties; Dave Williams, Association of Washington Cities; and April Putney, Futurewise.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS |
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Local Government & Housing. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Darneille, Chair; Takko, Vice Chair; McCune, Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Dunshee, Hudgins, Kenney, Pedersen, Sells, Van De Wege and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Armstrong, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Klippert and Short.
Staff: Owen Rowe (786-7391).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On General Government Appropriations Compared to Recommendation of Committee On Local Government & Housing:
The striking amendment specifies that members of the Growth Management Hearings Board (Board) must have experience in the practical application of land use law or land use planning. A provision is deleted that requires Board members to have experience in city or county planning rather than having been a city or county elected official. The provision that requires Board members serving on regional panels to have experience in city or county planning rather than having been a city or county elected official is also removed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2010.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Please support the amended version of this Senate bill that came out of the House Local Government Committee which reconciles the Senate bill with the version that passed out of this committee.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Nina Carter, Growth Management Hearings Boards.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.