SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5453

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5453 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Hargrove, Chair; Regala, Vice Chair; Stevens, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Carrell, Kauffman and McAuliffe.

Background: In dissolution cases in which minor children are involved, the parties must have a parenting plan that provides for the care of those children. The parenting plan must include an allocation of decision-making authority to one or both parents regarding the child's education, health care, and religious upbringing. The parenting plan must also set forth the child's residential time with each parent. The plan must include a specific residential schedule designating in which parent's home the child will reside on given days of the year.

A person with whom the child resides the majority of the time (principal residence) must notify every other person entitled to residential time or visitation with the child if that person intends to relocate his or her residence. "Relocate" is defined as a change in the child's principal residence either permanently or for a protracted period of time.

In December 2008 the Court of Appeals, in Spring v. Spring, ruled that under a parenting plan which designates that the child is to spend an equal amount of residential time with each parent, the child does not have a principal residence. As a result, a parent who relocates has not violated the statute if that parent does not notify the other parent that he or she is moving.

Summary of Bill: "Principal residence," for purposes of parenting plans, is defined as any residence where the child spends a significant number of school nights including those residences shared equally by the child. The term does not include residences where the child may spend weekends, holidays, or summer vacations.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This amendment makes clear that the relocation sections of the statute apply to the relocation of any residence where the child spends a significant number of school nights. The relocation statutes were designed to protect and provide stability and predictability to the children subject to a parenting plan. The Court of Appeals decision did away with that protection and stability because it does not apply to parenting plans in which children spend equal time with each parent. There are many parenting plans that exist in which the parents split the time equally and this bill is needed to provide direction to them should one decide to relocate.

House Amendment(s): The rebuttable presumption that the intended relocation of the child will be permitted does not apply when the child has substantially equal residential time with (1) the person proposing to relocate, and (2) another person with court-ordered residential time with the child.