SENATE BILL REPORT
SSB 5684
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Passed Senate, March 11, 2009
Title: An act relating to environmental mitigation in highway construction.
Brief Description: Addressing environmental mitigation in highway construction.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Swecker, Ranker, Hatfield, Jarrett and Kline).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Transportation: 2/16/09, 2/26/09 [DPS].
Passed Senate: 3/11/09, 49-0.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION |
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5684 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Haugen, Chair; Marr, Vice Chair; Swecker, Ranking Minority Member; Becker, Berkey, Delvin, Eide, Jacobsen, Jarrett, Kastama, Kilmer, King, Ranker and Sheldon.
Staff: Amanda Cecil (786-7429)
Background: Under the State and Federal Environmental Policy Acts, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is required to review unavoidable environmental impacts of transportation construction projects and identify possible mitigation measures. Mitigation may include enhancing existing environments, such as wetlands, or creating new habitats, such as new wetlands.
Under the State Growth Management Act certain counties and cities are required to designate agricultural lands that are of long-term commercial significance and develop conservation strategies applicable to those lands.
Summary of Substitute Bill: In the process of reviewing potential sites to be used for mitigation of a highway construction project, if WSDOT considers using agricultural lands of long-term significance, they must, to the greatest extent possible, consider using public land first. Additionally, WSDOT must make every effort to avoid any net loss of agricultural lands that have a designation of long-term commercial significance.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: CON: Washington State has lost 80 percent of its wetlands. There is no regulation in the destruction of wetlands. The word "any" in this bill is too specific and restrictive. The language needs to be tempered to allow more flexibility. There needs to be a balance between the mitigation of agricultural land with long-term commercial significance and the mitigation of wetlands.
OTHER: The bill requires a significant change in the current process used by WSDOT. It is suggested that the language be adjusted to focus on projects that have the potential to use agricultural lands.
Persons Testifying: CON: James Hodges, Clear Valley Environmental Farm.
OTHER: Megan White, WSDOT.