SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5797

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of February 12, 2009

Title: An act relating to exemptions from solid waste handling permit requirements.

Brief Description: Regarding exemptions from solid waste handling permit requirements.

Sponsors: Senators Haugen, Ranker, Brandland and Hatfield.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Agriculture & Rural Economic Development: 2/03/09.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Staff: Sam Thompson (786-7413)

Background: Anaerobic digesters are structures designed to compost (or "digest") livestock manure and other organic waste while limiting access to oxygen, creating methane and other gases that are then burned as fuel to generate electricity. Three anaerobic digesters currently operate in Snohomish, Whatcom, and Yakima counties; a fourth is currently under construction in Skagit County.

Use of organic solid waste (including food processing waste) as feedstock in anaerobic digesters has raised issues regarding applicability of the state Solid Waste Management Act, which includes several permitting requirements for handling and disposal of solid waste.

Summary of Bill: An exemption from solid waste permitting requirements for anaerobic digesters is authorized, provided that digesters comply with specified conditions. By August 1, 2009, the Department of Ecology (DOE) and the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA), in consultation with the Department of Health, must issue guidelines for anaerobic codigestion of livestock manure and organic waste-derived material, explaining the steps necessary for a digester owner or operator to meet conditions for the exemption. The conditions are as follows:

DOE is authorized to issue an appropriate order to a person violating a condition of this exemption and other, existing exemptions to solid waste permitting requirements to ensure compliance with exemption conditions. Orders may be appealed to the Pollution Control Hearings Board under established procedures.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY AGRICULTURE & RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (Proposed First Substitute): Changes: (1) reorder sections and subsections and clarify language; (2) provide that digestate must be managed under a dairy nutrient management plan specifically addressing digestate, meet compost quality standards, or be managed in alternate manner approved by DOE; (3) clarify that digestate managed under a dairy nutrient management plan specifically addressing digestate is no longer considered a solid waste; (4) provide that imported organic waste-derived material must be received or stored in structure meeting an NRCS standard, be approved by an NRCS representative, or meet certain construction industry standards; and (5) add definitions of "best management practices" and "digestate."

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Requested on February 2, 2009.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This measure promotes an innovative source of renewable energy. Conditions imposed on digester operations, which were negotiated with regulatory agencies, are workable. Concerns regarding emissions are already addressed in air quality permits. While the bill is laudable, it needs clarification, including revision of the definition of "organic waste-derived material" to ensure adequate environmental protection.

CON: Limits on manure and waste feedstock should be based on mass rather than volume. Ammonia and other emissions of concern are not adequately addressed in current language.

OTHER: Carbon benefits provided by digesters are important. While the bill language is somewhat complex, guidelines that will be provided by the agencies will be clear and easy to read. Provisions providing for appeals of penalties to the Pollution Control Hearings Board benefit operators because such appeals are less costly and burdensome than judicial appeals.

Persons Testifying: PRO: John Sayre, Andy Werhoven, Qualco Energy; Jay Gordon, Washington State Dairy Federation; Kevin Maas, Farm Power; Vicki Austin, Washington Refuse & Recycling Association; Jerry Smedes, Cedar Grove Composting.

CON: Dennis Burke, E3 .

OTHER: Jeff Canaan, Department of Agriculture; Laurie Davies, Department of Ecology.