FINAL BILL REPORT
SSB 5882
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
C 213 L 09
Synopsis as Enacted
Brief Description: Remediating racial disproportionality in child welfare practices.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Kauffman, McAuliffe, Regala, Shin and Kline).
Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections
House Committee on Early Learning & Children's Services
House Committee on Health & Human Services Appropriations
Background: Advisory Committee. Substitute House Bill 1472, passed during the 2007 Legislative Session, directed the Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) to convene an advisory committee to analyze and make recommendations on the disproportionate representation of children of color in the Washington State child welfare system.
The committee, established in August 2007, was directed to investigate whether racial disproportionality exists in Washington’s child welfare system and, if so, to identify those decision points in the system where disproportionality occurs. The legislation also directed the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) to provide technical assistance to the committee. By June 2008 the committee was to have prepared a report for the Secretary of the DSHS on the prevalence of disproportionality.
WSIPP Report. In 2004, the focus year for the analysis, WSIPP identified 58,005 children referred to Child Protective Services (CPS). These children were followed through November 2007. WSIPP examined the proportions of children from various racial groups at different points in the child welfare system to determine whether disproportionality exists in the system.
Structured Decision-making (SDM). SDM is a case management model that includes 18 specific questions with detailed definitions. The resulting score can then be used to determine which families will receive services. The primary goal of SDM is to reduce subsequent harm to children. SDM must be used in conjunction with other assessments that specifically consider safety and family functioning. SDM risk assessment is used in combination with a safety assessment to assess immediate danger to children to inform the decision whether Children's Administration should provide and monitor ongoing services to a family following investigation of child abuse or neglect allegations. The purpose of the risk assessment is to identify families who are most likely to experience a future event of child abuse or neglect.
Family Team Decision-making Model (FTDM). FTDMs are meetings that occur whenever a placement decision needs to be made. Typical FTDM participants include the parents, the child (if appropriate), relatives, family friends, neighbors, caregivers, community members, and service providers along with the assigned social worker and the social worker's supervisor. Generally, FTDMs occur when there is an imminent risk of placement, when a child has been placed on an emergency basis, or when a child's placement may be changing.
Summary: The WSIPP is to evaluate DSHS's use of structured decision-making practices and the implementation of the family team decision-making model to determine whether and how those efforts result in reducing disproportionate representation of African-American, Native American, and Latino children in the state's child welfare system. WSIPP is to analyze the points in the system at which current data reflect the greatest levels of disproportionality. WSIPP is to report its findings to the Legislature and DSHS by September 1, 2010.
The WSIPP evaluation is to be paid for either through current funds appropriated to complete the evaluation or within funding made available by private grant or contribution. If neither public nor private funding is available to simultaneously study both the structured decision making practices and the family team decision-making model, WSIPP is to evaluate the family team decision-making model first.
DSHS and WSIPP are to execute a data sharing agreement to comply with DSHS's confidentiality requirements and to provide WSIPP with data it will need to conduct the evaluation. DSHS and WSIPP are to jointly identify potential sources of private funding to supplement any state funds appropriated for the evaluation.
Votes on Final Passage:
Senate | 45 | 0 | |
House | 98 | 0 |
Effective: | July 26, 2009 |