SENATE BILL REPORT

SSB 6009

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6009 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Keiser, Chair; Franklin, Vice Chair; Pflug, Ranking Minority Member; Fairley, Marr and Murray.

Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.

Signed by Senators Becker and Parlette.

Background: Currently, there are 240 licensed nursing facilities in the state, with an average of 91 beds. Approximately half of all residents, about 10,860 people, have services paid through Medicaid contracts with the state, and the rest pay privately. Under current state law, it is illegal to discriminate against Medicaid recipients including to require new residents to give assurances upon admission that they are not eligible or will ever apply for Medicaid. Further, it is also unlawful to deny admission or readmission because of a resident's status as a Medicaid recipient, or to transfer or discharge a patient because of that person's status as a Medicaid recipient.

Summary of Substitute Bill: Nursing facilities must fully disclose to residents, orally and in writing prior to admission, the facility's policy on accepting Medicaid as a payment source. This must be done in a language that the resident or the resident's representative understands. The policy must clearly state the circumstances under which the facility provides care to Medicaid eligible residents, and for residents who may later become eligible for Medicaid.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: The elderly need assurances that they will not be kicked out of the facility that has become their home when their finances force them to become Medicaid clients. It is inhumane to have a long-term care system that treats vulnerable elderly this way. Families need to be fully informed, upfront and clear, of the facility's obligation to them. The worst fear residents have is being kicked out.

CON: This is the wrong solution to the problem of managing Medicaid clients. The problem is the rates are too low, and facilities have to be able to manage their businesses. We need flexibility to do this. We are already cost shifting substantially to private pay. This bill creates binding contracts out of facility policy which is a bad idea.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Larry Faulk, former Senator; Hilke Faber, Residential Councils of Washington; Jeff Crollard, LTC Ombudsman; Louise Ryan, Long-term care ombudsman.

CON: Tom Stanley, Arbor village; Robin Dale, Gary Weeks, WHCA; Deb Murphy, Aging Services of Washington.

House Amendment(s): Nursing facilities are not required to have a separate disclosure form describing their policy on accepting Medicaid as a payment source.