Passed by the House April 25, 2009 Yeas 67 Nays 28 ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate April 25, 2009 Yeas 28 Nays 19 ________________________________________ President of the Senate		CERTIFICATE I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1379 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Chief Clerk
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington		FILED Secretary of State State of Washington

AN ACT Relating to moratoria and other interim official controls adopted under the shoreline management act; adding a new section to chapter 90.58 RCW; and creating a new section.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature recognizes that cities and counties have moratoria authority granted through constitutional and statutory provisions and that this authority, when properly exercised, is an important aspect of complying with environmental stewardship and protection requirements.
Recognizing the fundamental role and value of properly exercised moratoria, the legislature intends to establish new moratoria procedures and to affirm moratoria authority that local governments have and may exercise when implementing the shoreline management act, while recognizing the legitimate interests of existing shoreline related developments during the period of interim moratoria.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 90.58 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Local governments may adopt moratoria or other interim official controls as necessary and appropriate to implement this chapter.
     (2)(a) A local government adopting a moratorium or control under this section must:
     (i) Hold a public hearing on the moratorium or control;
     (ii) Adopt detailed findings of fact that include, but are not limited to justifications for the proposed or adopted actions and explanations of the desired and likely outcomes;
     (iii) Notify the department of the moratorium or control immediately after its adoption. The notification must specify the time, place, and date of any public hearing required by this subsection;
     (iv) Provide that all lawfully existing uses, structures, or other development shall continue to be deemed lawful conforming uses and may continue to be maintained, repaired, and redeveloped, so long as the use is not expanded, under the terms of the land use and shoreline rules and regulations in place at the time of the moratorium.
     (b) The public hearing required by this section must be held within sixty days of the adoption of the moratorium or control.
     (3) A moratorium or control adopted under this section may be effective for up to six months if a detailed work plan for remedying the issues and circumstances necessitating the moratorium or control is developed and made available for public review. A moratorium or control may be renewed for two six-month periods if the local government complies with subsection (2)(a) of this section before each renewal. If a moratorium or control is in effect on the date a proposed master program or amendment is submitted to the department, the moratorium or control must remain in effect until the department's final action under RCW 90.58.090; however, the moratorium expires six months after the date of submittal if the department has not taken final action.
     (4) Nothing in this section may be construed to modify county and city moratoria powers conferred outside this chapter.