Passed by the House April 24, 2009 Yeas 85   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate April 22, 2009 Yeas 32   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1292 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. BARBARA BAKER ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
Approved May 18, 2009, 3:57 p.m. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | May 20, 2009 Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 61st Legislature | 2009 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/20/09.
AN ACT Relating to waivers from the one hundred eighty-day school year; amending RCW 28A.655.180; adding a new section to chapter 28A.305 RCW; creating a new section; repealing RCW 28A.305.145; and providing an expiration date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature continues to support school
districts seeking innovations to further the educational experiences of
students and staff while also realizing increased efficiencies in day-to-day operations. School districts have suggested that efficiencies
in heating, lighting, or maintenance expenses could be possible if
districts were given the ability to create a more flexible calendar.
Furthermore, the legislature finds that a flexible calendar could be
beneficial to student learning by allowing for the use of the
unscheduled days for professional development activities, planning,
tutoring, special programs, parent conferences, and athletic events.
A flexible calendar also has the potential to ease the burden of long
commutes on students in rural areas and to lower absenteeism.
School districts in several western states have operated on a four-day school week and report increased efficiencies, family support, and
reduced absenteeism, with no negative impact on student learning.
Small rural school districts in particular could benefit due to their
high per-pupil costs for transportation and utilities. Therefore, the
legislature intends to provide increased flexibility to a limited
number of school districts to explore the potential value of operating
on a flexible calendar, so long as adequate safeguards are put in place
to prevent any negative impact on student learning.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 28A.305
RCW to read as follows:
(1) In addition to waivers authorized under RCW 28A.305.140 and
28A.655.180, the state board of education may grant waivers from the
requirement for a one hundred eighty-day school year under RCW
28A.150.220 and 28A.150.250 to school districts that propose to operate
one or more schools on a flexible calendar for purposes of economy and
efficiency as provided in this section. The requirement under RCW
28A.150.220 that school districts offer an annual average instructional
hour offering of at least one thousand hours shall not be waived.
(2) A school district seeking a waiver under this section must
submit an application that includes:
(a) A proposed calendar for the school day and school year that
demonstrates how the instructional hour requirement will be maintained;
(b) An explanation and estimate of the economies and efficiencies
to be gained from compressing the instructional hours into fewer than
one hundred eighty days;
(c) An explanation of how monetary savings from the proposal will
be redirected to support student learning;
(d) A summary of comments received at one or more public hearings
on the proposal and how concerns will be addressed;
(e) An explanation of the impact on students who rely upon free and
reduced-price school child nutrition services and the impact on the
ability of the child nutrition program to operate an economically
independent program;
(f) An explanation of the impact on the ability to recruit and
retain employees in education support positions;
(g) An explanation of the impact on students whose parents work
during the missed school day; and
(h) Other information that the state board of education may request
to assure that the proposed flexible calendar will not adversely affect
student learning.
(3) The state board of education shall adopt criteria to evaluate
waiver requests. No more than five districts may be granted waivers.
Waivers may be granted for up to three years. After each school year,
the state board of education shall analyze empirical evidence to
determine whether the reduction is affecting student learning. If the
state board of education determines that student learning is adversely
affected, the school district shall discontinue the flexible calendar
as soon as possible but not later than the beginning of the next school
year after the determination has been made. All waivers expire August
31, 2014.
(a) Two of the five waivers granted under this subsection shall be
granted to school districts with student populations of less than one
hundred fifty students.
(b) Three of the five waivers granted under this subsection shall
be granted to school districts with student populations of between one
hundred fifty-one and five hundred students.
(4) The state board of education shall examine the waivers granted
under this section and make a recommendation to the education
committees of the legislature by December 15, 2013, regarding whether
the waiver program should be continued, modified, or allowed to
terminate. This recommendation should focus on whether the program
resulted in improved student learning as demonstrated by empirical
evidence. Such evidence includes, but is not limited to: Improved
scores on the Washington assessment of student learning, results of the
dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, student grades, and
attendance.
(5) This section expires August 31, 2014.
Sec. 3 RCW 28A.655.180 and 1995 c 208 s 1 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The state board of education, where appropriate, or the
superintendent of public instruction, where appropriate, may grant
waivers to districts from the provisions of statutes or rules relating
to: The length of the school year; student-to-teacher ratios; and
other administrative rules that in the opinion of the state board of
education or the opinion of the superintendent of public instruction
may need to be waived in order for a district to implement a plan for
restructuring its educational program or the educational program of
individual schools within the district.
(2) School districts may use the application process in RCW
28A.305.140 ((or 28A.300.138)) to apply for the waivers under
((subsection (1) of)) this section.
(((3) The joint select committee on education restructuring shall
study which waivers of state laws or rules are necessary for school
districts to implement education restructuring. The committee shall
study whether the waivers are used to implement specific essential
academic learning requirements and student learning goals. The
committee shall study the availability of waivers under the schools for
the twenty-first century program created by chapter 525, Laws of 1987,
and the use of those waivers by schools participating in that program.
The committee shall also study the use of waivers authorized under RCW
28A.305.140. The committee shall report its findings to the
legislature by December 1, 1997.))
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 RCW 28A.305.145 (Application process for
waivers under RCW 28A.305.140) and 1993 c 336 s 302 are each repealed.