Passed by the House February 15, 2010 Yeas 98   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate March 2, 2010 Yeas 36   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2789 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. BARBARA BAKER ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
Approved March 12, 2010, 1:44 p.m. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | March 12, 2010 Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 61st Legislature | 2010 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/02/10.
AN ACT Relating to authorizing issuance of subpoenas for purposes of agency investigations of underground economic activity; amending RCW 51.04.040 and 50.12.130; adding a new section to chapter 82.32 RCW; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 (1) The legislature finds that underground
economy activity in this state results in lost revenue to the state and
is unfair to law-abiding businesses. The legislature further finds
that agencies that collect taxes and overpayments on behalf of the
state have authority under current law to issue subpoenas and that the
issuance of subpoenas is a highly useful tool in the investigation of
underground activity of businesses and the unreported employees who
work for them. The legislature further finds that in the case of State
v. Miles, the Washington supreme court held that Article 1, section 7
of the state Constitution requires judicial review of a subpoena under
some circumstances.
(2) The legislature therefore intends to provide a process for the
department of revenue, the department of labor and industries, and the
employment security department to apply for court approval of an agency
investigative subpoena which is authorized under current law in cases
where the agency seeks such approval, or where court approval is
required by Article 1, section 7. The legislature does not intend to
require court approval except where otherwise required by law or
Article 1, section 7. The legislature does not intend to create any
new authority to subpoena records or create any new rights for any
person.
Sec. 2 RCW 51.04.040 and 1987 c 316 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The director and his or her authorized assistants ((shall))
have power to issue subpoenas to enforce the attendance and testimony
of witnesses and the production and examination of books, papers,
photographs, tapes, and records before the department in connection
with any claim made to the department, any billing submitted to the
department, or the assessment or collection of premiums. The superior
court ((shall have)) has the power to enforce any such subpoena by
proper proceedings.
(2)(a) The director and his or her authorized assistants may apply
for and obtain a superior court order approving and authorizing a
subpoena in advance of its issuance. The application may be made in
the county where the subpoenaed person resides or is found, or the
county where the subpoenaed records or documents are located, or in
Thurston county. The application must (i) state that an order is
sought pursuant to this subsection; (ii) adequately specify the
records, documents, or testimony; and (iii) declare under oath that an
investigation is being conducted for a lawfully authorized purpose
related to an investigation within the department's authority and that
the subpoenaed documents or testimony are reasonably related to an
investigation within the department's authority.
(b) Where the application under this subsection is made to the
satisfaction of the court, the court must issue an order approving the
subpoena. An order under this subsection constitutes authority of law
for the agency to subpoena the records or testimony.
(c) The director and his or her authorized assistants may seek
approval and a court may issue an order under this subsection without
prior notice to any person, including the person to whom the subpoena
is directed and the person who is the subject of an investigation.
Sec. 3 RCW 50.12.130 and 1945 c 35 s 52 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) In the discharge of the duties imposed by this title, the
appeal tribunal and any duly authorized representative of the
commissioner shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations,
take depositions, certify to official acts and issue subpoenas to
compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers,
correspondence, memoranda, and other records deemed to be necessary as
evidence in connection with any dispute or the administration of this
title. It shall be unlawful for any person, without just cause, to
fail to comply with subpoenas issued pursuant to the provisions of this
section.
(2)(a) Any authorized representative of the commissioner may apply
for and obtain a superior court order approving and authorizing a
subpoena in advance of its issuance. The application may be made in
the county where the subpoenaed person resides or is found, or the
county where the subpoenaed records or documents are located, or in
Thurston county. The application must:
(i) State that an order is sought pursuant to this subsection;
(ii) Adequately specify the records, documents, or testimony; and
(iii) Declare under oath that an investigation is being conducted
for a lawfully authorized purpose related to an investigation within
the department's authority and that the subpoenaed documents or
testimony are reasonably related to an investigation within the
department's authority.
(b) Where the application under this subsection is made to the
satisfaction of the court, the court must issue an order approving the
subpoena. An order under this subsection constitutes authority of law
for the agency to subpoena the records or testimony.
(c) Any authorized representative of the commissioner may seek
approval and a court may issue an order under this subsection without
prior notice to any person, including the person to whom the subpoena
is directed and the person who is the subject of an investigation.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 82.32 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The department or its duly authorized agent may apply for and
obtain a superior court order approving and authorizing a subpoena in
advance of its issuance. The application may be made in the county
where the subpoenaed person resides or is found, or the county where
the subpoenaed records or documents are located, or in Thurston county.
The application must:
(a) State that an order is sought pursuant to this subsection;
(b) Adequately specify the records, documents, or testimony; and
(c) Declare under oath that an investigation is being conducted for
a lawfully authorized purpose related to an investigation within the
department's authority and that the subpoenaed documents or testimony
are reasonably related to an investigation within the department's
authority.
(2) Where the application under this subsection is made to the
satisfaction of the court, the court must issue an order approving the
subpoena. An order under this subsection constitutes authority of law
for the agency to subpoena the records or testimony.
(3) The department or its duly authorized agent may seek approval
and a court may issue an order under this subsection without prior
notice to any person, including the person to whom the subpoena is
directed and the person who is the subject of an investigation.