CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2893

Chapter 237, Laws of 2010

(partial veto)

61st Legislature
2010 Regular Session



SCHOOL LEVIES



EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/10/10 - Except sections 1 and 3 through 9, which become effective 03/29/10; and section 2, which becomes effective 01/01/18.

Passed by the House February 13, 2010
  Yeas 55   Nays 41

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate March 11, 2010
  Yeas 29   Nays 19


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2893 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


BARBARA BAKER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved March 29, 2010, 2:26 p.m., with the exception of Section 12 which is vetoed.







CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
March 30, 2010







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2893
_____________________________________________

Passed Legislature - 2010 Regular Session
State of Washington61st Legislature2010 Regular Session

By House Education Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Sullivan, Carlyle, Hunter, Maxwell, Nelson, Hunt, Appleton, Simpson, Dickerson, White, Pedersen, Green, Sells, Eddy, Springer, Williams, Orwall, Goodman, Conway, Kenney, Rolfes, Ericks, Ormsby, Kagi, Roberts, and Jacks)

READ FIRST TIME 02/05/10.   



     AN ACT Relating to school levies; amending RCW 84.52.0531, 84.52.0531, 84.52.053, and 28A.500.020; amending 2009 c 4 s 909 (uncodified); amending 2006 c 119 s 3 (uncodified); reenacting and amending RCW 28A.500.030; creating new sections; providing an effective date; providing an expiration date; and declaring an emergency.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 84.52.0531 and 2009 c 4 s 908 are each amended to read as follows:
     LEVY BASE 2011-17. The maximum dollar amount which may be levied by or for any school district for maintenance and operation support under the provisions of RCW 84.52.053 shall be determined as follows:
     (1) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 1997, the maximum dollar amount shall be calculated pursuant to the laws and rules in effect in November 1996.
     (2) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 1998 and thereafter, the maximum dollar amount shall be the sum of (a) plus or minus (b) and (c) of this subsection minus (d) of this subsection:
     (a) The district's levy base as defined in subsections (3) and (4) of this section multiplied by the district's maximum levy percentage as defined in subsection (((5))) (6) of this section;
     (b) For districts in a high/nonhigh relationship, the high school district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced and the nonhigh school district's maximum levy amount shall be increased by an amount equal to the estimated amount of the nonhigh payment due to the high school district under RCW 28A.545.030(3) and 28A.545.050 for the school year commencing the year of the levy;
     (c) For districts in an interdistrict cooperative agreement, the nonresident school district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced and the resident school district's maximum levy amount shall be increased by an amount equal to the per pupil basic education allocation included in the nonresident district's levy base under subsection (3) of this section multiplied by:
     (i) The number of full-time equivalent students served from the resident district in the prior school year; multiplied by:
     (ii) The serving district's maximum levy percentage determined under subsection (((5))) (6) of this section; increased by:
     (iii) The percent increase per full-time equivalent student as stated in the state basic education appropriation section of the biennial budget between the prior school year and the current school year divided by fifty-five percent;
     (d) The district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced by the maximum amount of state matching funds for which the district is eligible under RCW 28A.500.010.
     (3) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 2005 and thereafter, a district's levy base shall be the sum of allocations in (a) through (c) of this subsection received by the district for the prior school year and the amounts determined under subsection (4) of this section, including allocations for compensation increases, plus the sum of such allocations multiplied by the percent increase per full time equivalent student as stated in the state basic education appropriation section of the biennial budget between the prior school year and the current school year and divided by fifty-five percent. A district's levy base shall not include local school district property tax levies or other local revenues, or state and federal allocations not identified in (a) through (c) of this subsection.
     (a) The district's basic education allocation as determined pursuant to RCW 28A.150.250, 28A.150.260, and 28A.150.350;
     (b) State and federal categorical allocations for the following programs:
     (i) Pupil transportation;
     (ii) Special education;
     (iii) Education of highly capable students;
     (iv) Compensatory education, including but not limited to learning assistance, migrant education, Indian education, refugee programs, and bilingual education;
     (v) Food services; and
     (vi) Statewide block grant programs; and
     (c) Any other federal allocations for elementary and secondary school programs, including direct grants, other than federal impact aid funds and allocations in lieu of taxes.
     (4) For levy collections in calendar years 2005 through ((2011)) 2017, in addition to the allocations included under subsection (3)(a) through (c) of this section, a district's levy base shall also include the following:
     (a)(i) For levy collections in calendar year 2010, the difference between the allocation the district would have received in the current school year had RCW 84.52.068 not been amended by chapter 19, Laws of 2003 1st sp. sess. and the allocation the district received in the current school year pursuant to RCW ((84.52.068. The office of the superintendent of public instruction shall offset the amount added to a district's levy base pursuant to this subsection (4)(a) by any additional per student allocations included in a district's levy base pursuant to the enactment of an initiative to the people subsequent to June 10, 2004)) 28A.505.220;
     (ii) For levy collections in calendar years 2011 through 2017, the difference between the allocation rate the district would have received in the prior school year using the Initiative 728 rate and the allocation rate the district received in the prior school year pursuant to RCW 28A.505.220 multiplied by the full-time equivalent student enrollment used to calculate the Initiative 728 allocation for the prior school year
; and
     (b) The difference between the allocations the district would have received the prior school year ((had RCW 28A.400.205 not been amended by chapter 20, Laws of 2003 1st sp. sess.)) using the Initiative 732 base and the allocations the district actually received the prior school year pursuant to RCW 28A.400.205. ((The office of the superintendent of public instruction shall offset the amount added to a district's levy base pursuant to this subsection (4)(b) by any additional salary increase allocations included in a district's levy base pursuant to the enactment of an initiative to the people subsequent to June 10, 2004.))
     (5) For levy collections in calendar years 2011 through 2017, in addition to the allocations included under subsections (3)(a) through (c) and (4)(a) and (b) of this section, a district's levy base shall also include the difference between an allocation of fifty-three and two-tenths certificated instructional staff units per thousand full-time equivalent students in grades kindergarten through four enrolled in the prior school year and the allocation of certificated instructional staff units per thousand full-time equivalent students in grades kindergarten through four that the district actually received in the prior school year, except that the levy base for a school district whose allocation in the 2009-10 school year was less than fifty-three and two-tenths certificated instructional staff units per thousand full-time equivalent students in grades kindergarten through four shall include the difference between the allocation the district actually received in the 2009-10 school year and the allocation the district actually received in the prior school year.
     (6)(a)
A district's maximum levy percentage shall be ((twenty-two)) twenty-four percent in ((1998)) 2010 and ((twenty-four)) twenty-eight percent in ((1999)) 2011 through 2017 and twenty-four percent every year thereafter; ((plus,))
     (b) For qualifying districts, in addition to the percentage in (a) of this subsection the grandfathered percentage determined as follows:
     (((a))) (i) For 1997, the difference between the district's 1993 maximum levy percentage and twenty percent; and
     (((b))) (ii) For ((1998 and thereafter)) 2011 through 2017, the percentage calculated as follows:
     (((i))) (A) Multiply the grandfathered percentage for the prior year times the district's levy base determined under subsection (3) of this section;
     (((ii))) (B) Reduce the result of (((b)(i))) (b)(ii)(A) of this subsection by any levy reduction funds as defined in subsection (((6))) (7) of this section that are to be allocated to the district for the current school year;
     (((iii))) (C) Divide the result of (((b)(ii))) (b)(ii)(B) of this subsection by the district's levy base; and
     (((iv))) (D) Take the greater of zero or the percentage calculated in (((b)(iii))) (b)(ii)(C) of this subsection.
     (((6))) (7) "Levy reduction funds" shall mean increases in state funds from the prior school year for programs included under subsections (3) and (4) of this section: (a) That are not attributable to enrollment changes, compensation increases, or inflationary adjustments; and (b) that are or were specifically identified as levy reduction funds in the appropriations act. If levy reduction funds are dependent on formula factors which would not be finalized until after the start of the current school year, the superintendent of public instruction shall estimate the total amount of levy reduction funds by using prior school year data in place of current school year data. Levy reduction funds shall not include moneys received by school districts from cities or counties.
     (((7) For the purposes of this section,)) (8) The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
     (a)
"Prior school year" means the most recent school year completed prior to the year in which the levies are to be collected.
     (((8) For the purposes of this section,)) (b) "Current school year" means the year immediately following the prior school year.
     (c) "Initiative 728 rate" means the allocation rate at which the student achievement program would have been funded under chapter 3, Laws of 2001, if all annual adjustments to the initial 2001 allocation rate had been made in previous years and in each subsequent year as provided for under chapter 3, Laws of 2001.
     (d) "Initiative 732 base" means the prior year's state allocation for annual salary cost-of-living increases for district employees in the state-funded salary base as it would have been calculated under chapter 4, Laws of 2001, if each annual cost-of-living increase allocation had been provided in previous years and in each subsequent year.

     (9) Funds collected from transportation vehicle fund tax levies shall not be subject to the levy limitations in this section.
     (10) The superintendent of public instruction shall develop rules ((and regulations)) and inform school districts of the pertinent data necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.
     (11) For calendar year 2009, the office of the superintendent of public instruction shall recalculate school district levy authority to reflect levy rates certified by school districts for calendar year 2009.

Sec. 2   RCW 84.52.0531 and 1997 c 259 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     LEVY BASE 2018 AND THEREAFTER. The maximum dollar amount which may be levied by or for any school district for maintenance and operation support under the provisions of RCW 84.52.053 shall be determined as follows:
     (1) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 1997, the maximum dollar amount shall be calculated pursuant to the laws and rules in effect in November 1996.
     (2) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 1998 and thereafter, the maximum dollar amount shall be the sum of (a) plus or minus (b) and (c) of this subsection minus (d) of this subsection:
     (a) The district's levy base as defined in subsection (3) of this section multiplied by the district's maximum levy percentage as defined in subsection (4) of this section;
     (b) For districts in a high/nonhigh relationship, the high school district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced and the nonhigh school district's maximum levy amount shall be increased by an amount equal to the estimated amount of the nonhigh payment due to the high school district under RCW 28A.545.030(3) and 28A.545.050 for the school year commencing the year of the levy;
     (c) For districts in an interdistrict cooperative agreement, the nonresident school district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced and the resident school district's maximum levy amount shall be increased by an amount equal to the per pupil basic education allocation included in the nonresident district's levy base under subsection (3) of this section multiplied by:
     (i) The number of full-time equivalent students served from the resident district in the prior school year; multiplied by:
     (ii) The serving district's maximum levy percentage determined under subsection (4) of this section; increased by:
     (iii) The percent increase per full-time equivalent student as stated in the state basic education appropriation section of the biennial budget between the prior school year and the current school year divided by fifty-five percent;
     (d) The district's maximum levy amount shall be reduced by the maximum amount of state matching funds for which the district is eligible under RCW 28A.500.010.
     (3) For excess levies for collection in calendar year 1998 and thereafter, a district's levy base shall be the sum of allocations in (a) through (c) of this subsection received by the district for the prior school year, including allocations for compensation increases, plus the sum of such allocations multiplied by the percent increase per full time equivalent student as stated in the state basic education appropriation section of the biennial budget between the prior school year and the current school year and divided by fifty-five percent. A district's levy base shall not include local school district property tax levies or other local revenues, or state and federal allocations not identified in (a) through (c) of this subsection.
     (a) The district's basic education allocation as determined pursuant to RCW 28A.150.250, 28A.150.260, and 28A.150.350;
     (b) State and federal categorical allocations for the following programs:
     (i) Pupil transportation;
     (ii) Special education;
     (iii) Education of highly capable students;
     (iv) Compensatory education, including but not limited to learning assistance, migrant education, Indian education, refugee programs, and bilingual education;
     (v) Food services; and
     (vi) Statewide block grant programs; and
     (c) Any other federal allocations for elementary and secondary school programs, including direct grants, other than federal impact aid funds and allocations in lieu of taxes.
     (4)(a) A district's maximum levy percentage shall be ((twenty-two)) twenty-four percent in ((1998)) 2010 and ((twenty-four)) twenty-eight percent in ((1999)) 2011 through 2017 and twenty-four percent every year thereafter; ((plus,))
     (b) For qualifying districts, in addition to the percentage in (a) of this subsection the grandfathered percentage determined as follows:
     (((a))) (i) For 1997, the difference between the district's 1993 maximum levy percentage and twenty percent; and
     (((b))) (ii) For ((1998 and thereafter)) 2011 through 2017, the percentage calculated as follows:
     (((i))) (A) Multiply the grandfathered percentage for the prior year times the district's levy base determined under subsection (3) of this section;
     (((ii))) (B) Reduce the result of (((b)(i))) (b)(ii)(A) of this subsection by any levy reduction funds as defined in subsection (5) of this section that are to be allocated to the district for the current school year;
     (((iii))) (C) Divide the result of (((b)(ii))) (b)(ii)(B) of this subsection by the district's levy base; and
     (((iv))) (D) Take the greater of zero or the percentage calculated in (((b)(iii))) (b)(ii)(C) of this subsection.
     (iii) For 2018 and thereafter, the percentage shall be calculated as follows:
     (A) Multiply the grandfathered percentage for the prior year times the district's levy base determined under subsection (3) of this section;
     (B) Reduce the result of (b)(iii)(A) of this subsection by any levy reduction funds as defined in subsection (5) of this section that are to be allocated to the district for the current school year;
     (C) Divide the result of (b)(iii)(B) of this subsection by the district's levy base; and
     (D) Take the greater of zero or the percentage calculated in (b)(iii)(C) of this subsection.

     (5) "Levy reduction funds" shall mean increases in state funds from the prior school year for programs included under subsection (3) of this section: (a) That are not attributable to enrollment changes, compensation increases, or inflationary adjustments; and (b) that are or were specifically identified as levy reduction funds in the appropriations act. If levy reduction funds are dependent on formula factors which would not be finalized until after the start of the current school year, the superintendent of public instruction shall estimate the total amount of levy reduction funds by using prior school year data in place of current school year data. Levy reduction funds shall not include moneys received by school districts from cities or counties.
     (6) For the purposes of this section, "prior school year" means the most recent school year completed prior to the year in which the levies are to be collected.
     (7) For the purposes of this section, "current school year" means the year immediately following the prior school year.
     (8) Funds collected from transportation vehicle fund tax levies shall not be subject to the levy limitations in this section.
     (9) The superintendent of public instruction shall develop rules and regulations and inform school districts of the pertinent data necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   INTENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL LEVIES. The legislature recognizes that school districts request voter approval for two-year through four-year levies based on their projected levy capacities at the time that the levies are submitted to the voters. It is the intent of the legislature to permit school districts with voter-approved maintenance and operation levies to seek an additional approval from the voters, if subsequently enacted legislation would permit a higher levy.

Sec. 4   RCW 84.52.053 and 2009 c 460 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     ADDITIONAL LEVIES FOR SUBSEQUENTLY ENACTED INCREASE. (1) The limitations imposed by RCW 84.52.050 through 84.52.056, and 84.52.043 shall not prevent the levy of taxes by school districts, when authorized so to do by the voters of such school district in the manner and for the purposes and number of years allowable under Article VII, section 2(a) of the Constitution of this state. Elections for such taxes shall be held in the year in which the levy is made or, in the case of propositions authorizing two-year through four-year levies for maintenance and operation support of a school district, authorizing two-year levies for transportation vehicle funds established in RCW 28A.160.130, or authorizing two-year through six-year levies to support the construction, modernization, or remodeling of school facilities, which includes the purposes of RCW 28A.320.330(2) (f) and (g), in the year in which the first annual levy is made.
     (2) Once additional tax levies have been authorized for maintenance and operation support of a school district for a two-year through four-year period as provided under subsection (1) of this section, no further additional tax levies for maintenance and operation support of the district for that period may be authorized, except for additional levies to provide for subsequently enacted increases affecting the district's levy base or maximum levy percentage. For the purpose of applying the limitation of this subsection, a two-year through six-year levy to support the construction, modernization, or remodeling of school facilities shall not be deemed to be a tax levy for maintenance and operation support of a school district.
     (3) A special election may be called and the time therefor fixed by the board of school directors, by giving notice thereof by publication in the manner provided by law for giving notices of general elections, at which special election the proposition authorizing such excess levy shall be submitted in such form as to enable the voters favoring the proposition to vote "yes" and those opposed thereto to vote "no".

Sec. 5   RCW 28A.500.020 and 2004 c 21 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     LEVY EQUALIZATION--DEFINITIONS. (1) Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
     (a) "Prior tax collection year" means the year immediately preceding the year in which the local effort assistance shall be allocated.
     (b) "Statewide average ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate" means ((twelve)) fourteen percent of the total levy bases as defined in RCW 84.52.0531 (3) and (4) summed for all school districts, and divided by the total assessed valuation for excess levy purposes in the prior tax collection year for all districts as adjusted to one hundred percent by the county indicated ratio established in RCW 84.48.075.
     (c) The "district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy amount" means the school district's maximum levy authority after transfers determined under RCW 84.52.0531(2) (a) through (c) divided by the district's maximum levy percentage determined under RCW 84.52.0531(5) multiplied by ((twelve)) fourteen percent.
     (d) The "district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate" means the district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy amount divided by the district's assessed valuation for excess levy purposes for the prior tax collection year as adjusted to one hundred percent by the county indicated ratio.
     (e) "Districts eligible for local effort assistance" means those districts with a ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate that exceeds the statewide average ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate.
     (2) Unless otherwise stated all rates, percents, and amounts are for the calendar year for which local effort assistance is being calculated under this chapter.

Sec. 6   RCW 28A.500.030 and 2006 c 372 s 904 and 2006 c 119 s 1 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
     LEVY EQUALIZATION--ALLOCATION. Allocation of state matching funds to eligible districts for local effort assistance shall be determined as follows:
     (1) Funds raised by the district through maintenance and operation levies shall be matched with state funds using the following ratio of state funds to levy funds:
     (a) The difference between the district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate and the statewide average ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate; to
     (b) The statewide average ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate.
     (2) The maximum amount of state matching funds for districts eligible for local effort assistance shall be the district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy amount, multiplied by the following percentage:
     (a) The difference between the district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate and the statewide average ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate; divided by
     (b) The district's ((twelve)) fourteen percent levy rate.
     (3) ((Calendar year 2003 allocations and maximum eligibility under this chapter shall be multiplied by 0.99.
     (4) From January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2005, allocations and maximum eligibility under this chapter shall be multiplied by 0.937.
     (5) From January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2006, allocations and maximum eligibility under this chapter shall be multiplied by 0.9563.
)) Beginning with calendar year 2007, allocations and maximum eligibility under this chapter shall be fully funded at one hundred percent and shall not be reduced.

Sec. 7   2009 c 4 s 909 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:
     Section 908 of this act expires January 1, ((2012)) 2018.

Sec. 8   2006 c 119 s 3 (uncodified) is amended to read as follows:
     This act expires January 1, ((2012)) 2018.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9   Sections 1, 5, and 6 of this act expire January 1, 2018.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10   Section 2 of this act takes effect January 1, 2018.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11   Sections 1 and 3 through 9 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect immediately.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12   The legislature finds that the sections contained in this act constitute a single integrated plan for revising the laws relating to school district maintenance and operations levies. If each provision of this act as passed by the senate and house of representatives is not enacted into law, the entire act is null and void. If by June 30, 2010, the superintendent of public instruction does not certify to the legislature that full funding has been appropriated in the 2010 omnibus operating appropriations act for the local effort assistance rates specified in sections 5 and 6 of this act, the entire act is null and void. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the act shall be considered invalid in its entirety, and the act and the application of any provision of the act to any person or circumstance shall be considered null and void and of no effect.
     *Sec. 12 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.


         Passed by the House February 13, 2010.
         Passed by the Senate March 11, 2010.
         Approved by the Governor March 29, 2010, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 30, 2010.

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

"I am returning herewith, without my approval as to Section 12, Substitute House Bill 2893 entitled:

     "AN ACT Relating to school levies."

Section 12 provides in part: "If each provision of this act as passed by the senate and house of representatives is not enacted into law, the entire act is null and void." The only action that could prevent any provision of the bill from being enacted into law is the veto power of the Governor. The Washington Constitution provides the Governor with the power to object to one or more sections of a bill while approving other sections of the bill. Section 12 purports to provide that the veto of any section of this bill is a veto of the entire bill. This attempt to constrain the Governor's veto power is inconsistent with our state constitution.

As noted by the Washington Supreme Court in Washington State Legislature v. Lowry, 131 Wn.2d 309, 320 (1997), "[o]ur constitution condones neither artful legislative drafting nor crafty gubernatorial vetoes." Neither the Legislature in its bill drafting nor the Governor in exercising the veto should deprive the other of the fair opportunity to exercise its constitutional prerogatives. A veto of Section 12 will cause "the act ... to be considered now just as it would have been if the vetoed provisions had never been written into the bill at any stage of the proceedings." State ex rel. Stiner v. Yelle, 174 Wash. 402, 408 (1933).

For these reasons, I have vetoed Section 12 of Substitute House Bill 2893.

With the exception of Section 12, Substitute House Bill 2893 is approved."