SB 6392-S.E - DIGEST |
(DIGEST AS ENACTED) |
Addresses the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV program relating to: (1) Use of toll-backed bond proceeds; |
(2) Maximum project cost and use of project cost savings; |
(3) Minimum carpool occupancy; |
(4) Mitigation plan for the Washington park arboretum; and |
(5) Establishing HOV lane performance standards. |
Establishes work groups to: (1) Study alternative transit connections at the University of Washington link light rail line; |
(2) Study and make recommendations regarding options for financing high-capacity transit through the corridor; and |
(3) Study and make recommendations regarding design refinements to the department of transportation's preferred alternative. |
Creates the state route number 520 civil penalties account and requires penalties from nonpayment of tolls to be deposited into the account. |
Provides a contingency for the account. |
VETO MESSAGE ON ESSB 6392 |
March 30, 2010 |
To the Honorable President and Members, |
The Senate of the State of Washington |
Ladies and Gentlemen: |
I am returning herewith, without my approval as to Sections 1 and 3, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6392 entitled: |
"AN ACT Relating to the use of revenue generated from tolling the state route number 520 corridor." |
Section 1 outlines legislative intent for the bill. I believe the legislation itself states clearly that improvements throughout the SR 520 corridor need to move forward, with the proper input from appropriate parties. However, Section 1 is vague and susceptible to conflicting interpretations, which I believe could hinder our ability to make progress on a project that is important to public safety and economic vitality. |
Section 3 requires that the SR 520 bridge be no higher than 20 feet. I recognize it is important to local communities that the bridge have as low a profile as possible. Decisions regarding the dimensions of a transportation facility must also be based on engineering standards, safety considerations, permitting requirements, and state and federal law. Section 3 potentially prevents the Department of Transportation from complying with Coast Guard requirements and eliminates any possibility of adjusting the size of the facility based upon design or permitting needs. As a result, I am vetoing this section and directing the Department to continue to work with neighborhoods and local governments to refine the preferred alternative design. |
For these reasons, I have vetoed Sections 1 and 3 of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6392. |
With the exception of Sections 1 and 3, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6392 is approved. |
Respectfully submitted, |
Christine Gregoire |
Governor |