HB 1702 -
By Representative Liias
ADOPTED 03/04/2011
On page 1, beginning on line 5, strike all of section 1 and insert the following:
"Sec. 1 RCW 82.02.050 and 1994 c 257 s 24 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) It is the intent of the legislature:
(a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new
growth and development;
(b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing
standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by
ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of
the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development;
and
(c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established
procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay
arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact.
(2) Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan
under RCW 36.70A.040 are authorized to impose impact fees on
development activity as part of the financing for public facilities,
provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new
development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other
sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees.
(3)(a) Counties, cities, and towns collecting impact fees must
adopt a permanent system for the collection of impact fees from
applicants for residential building permits issued for a lot or unit
created by a subdivision, short subdivision, site development permit,
binding site plan, or condominium that includes one or more of the
following:
(i)(A) A process by which an applicant for any development permit
that requires payment of an impact fee may record a covenant against
title to the lot or unit subject to the impact fee obligation. A
covenant under this subsection (3)(a)(i) must also serve as a lien.
The covenant must require payment equal to one hundred percent of the
impact fee applicable to the lot or unit at the rates in effect at the
time the building permit was issued, less a credit for any deposits
paid.
(B) Covenants recorded in accordance with this subsection (3)(a)(i)
must provide for payment of the impact fee through escrow at the
earlier of the following: The time of closing of sale of the
applicable lot or unit; or in accordance with the applicable county,
city, or town ordinance, eighteen or more months after the building
permit is issued. Payment of impact fees due at closing of a sale
must, unless an agreement to the contrary is reached between buyer and
seller, be made from the seller's proceeds. In the absence of an
agreement to the contrary, the seller bears strict liability for the
payment of the impact fees.
(C) Either a seller or a seller's agent, or both, of property
subject to a deferral covenant authorized under this subsection
(3)(a)(i) must provide written disclosure of the covenant to a
purchaser or prospective purchaser. Disclosure of the covenant must
include the amount of impact fees payable and the entities to which
fees are to be paid at closing.
(D) Upon receiving payment of impact fees due, the applicable
county, city, or town must remove the covenant recorded in accordance
with this subsection (3)(a)(i); or
(ii) A process by which an applicant may apply for a deferral of
the impact fee payment until final inspection or certificate of
occupancy, or equivalent certification.
(b) Counties, cities, and towns may adopt local systems for the
collection of impact fees that differ from the requirements of this
subsection (3) if the payment timing provisions are consistent with
those of this subsection.
(4) The impact fees:
(a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are
reasonably related to the new development;
(b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system
improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; and
(c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably
benefit the new development.
(((4))) (5)(a) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the
public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 which are addressed by a
capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan
adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.070 or the provisions
for comprehensive plan adoption contained in chapter 36.70, 35.63, or
35A.63 RCW. After the date a county, city, or town is required to
adopt its development regulations under chapter 36.70A RCW, continued
authorization to collect and expend impact fees ((shall be)) is
contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a
comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070, and on the
capital facilities plan identifying:
(((a))) (i) Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing
development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be
eliminated within a reasonable period of time;
(((b))) (ii) Additional demands placed on existing public
facilities by new development; and
(((c))) (iii) Additional public facility improvements required to
serve new development.
(b) If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is
complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the
responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may
impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the
county, city, or town is responsible."
On page 11, after line 17, insert the following:
"NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 This act expires July 1, 2016."
Correct the title.
EFFECT: Modifies proposed impact fee deferral requirements applying to jurisdictions that impose impact fees by: (1) Limiting the deferral requirements to applicants for residential building permits; (2) extending the deferral provisions to binding site plans; (3) allowing the applicable county, city, or town to extend the deferral beyond 18 months; (4) deleting a provision pertaining to dwellings built on land that is owned or otherwise controlled by a party who contracts for the construction of a dwelling; (5) removing a reference to specific seller disclosure requirements; (6) specifying that upon receiving payment of impact fees due, the applicable county, city, or town must remove the recorded impact fee covenant; (7) allowing counties, cities, and towns to adopt local impact fee deferral systems that differ from prescribed requirements if the payment timing provisions are consistent with specified requirements; and (8) adding a July 1, 2016, expiration date.