ESHB 1774 -
By Senators Hargrove, Stevens
ADOPTED 04/07/2011
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"Sec. 1 RCW 13.34.130 and 2010 c 288 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
If, after a fact-finding hearing pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, it has
been proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is
dependent within the meaning of RCW 13.34.030 after consideration of
the social study prepared pursuant to RCW 13.34.110 and after a
disposition hearing has been held pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, the court
shall enter an order of disposition pursuant to this section.
(1) The court shall order one of the following dispositions of the
case:
(a) Order a disposition ((other than removal of the child from))
that maintains the child in his or her home, which shall provide a
program designed to alleviate the immediate danger to the child, to
mitigate or cure any damage the child has already suffered, and to aid
the parents so that the child will not be endangered in the future. In
determining the disposition, the court should choose services to assist
the parents in maintaining the child in the home, including housing
assistance, if appropriate, that least interfere with family autonomy
and are adequate to protect the child.
(b)(i) Order the child to be removed from his or her home and into
the custody, control, and care of a relative or other suitable person,
the department, or a supervising agency for supervision of the child's
placement. The court may not order an Indian child, as defined in 25
U.S.C. Sec. 1903, to be removed from his or her home unless the court
finds, by clear and convincing evidence including testimony of
qualified expert witnesses, that the continued custody of the child by
the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional
or physical damage to the child.
(ii) The department or supervising agency has the authority to
place the child, subject to review and approval by the court (A) with
a relative as defined in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a), (B) in the home of
another suitable person if the child or family has a preexisting
relationship with that person, and the person has completed all
required criminal history background checks and otherwise appears to
the department or supervising agency to be suitable and competent to
provide care for the child, or (C) in a foster family home or group
care facility licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW.
(iii) The department may also consider placing the child, subject
to review and approval by the court, with a person with whom the
child's sibling or half-sibling is residing or a person who has adopted
the sibling or half-sibling of the child being placed as long as the
person has completed all required criminal history background checks
and otherwise appears to the department or supervising agency to be
competent to provide care for the child.
(2) Absent good cause, the department or supervising agency shall
follow the wishes of the natural parent regarding the placement of the
child in accordance with RCW 13.34.260.
(3) The department or supervising agency may only place a child
with a person not related to the child as defined in RCW
74.15.020(2)(a), including a placement provided for in subsection
(1)(b)(iii) of this section, when the court finds that such placement
is in the best interest of the child. Unless there is reasonable cause
to believe that the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be
jeopardized or that efforts to reunite the parent and child will be
hindered, the child shall be placed with a person who is willing,
appropriate, and available to care for the child, and who is: (I)
Related to the child as defined in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a) with whom the
child has a relationship and is comfortable; or (II) a suitable person
as described in ((this)) subsection (1)(b) of this section. The court
shall consider the child's existing relationships and attachments when
determining placement.
(((2))) (4) When placing an Indian child in out-of-home care, the
department or supervising agency shall follow the placement preference
characteristics in RCW 13.34.250 and in 25 U.S.C. Sec. 1915.
(((3))) (5) Placement of the child with a relative or other
suitable person as described in subsection (1)(b) of this section shall
be given preference by the court. An order for out-of-home placement
may be made only if the court finds that reasonable efforts have been
made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the
child's home and to make it possible for the child to return home,
specifying the services, including housing assistance, that have been
provided to the child and the child's parent, guardian, or legal
custodian, and that preventive services have been offered or provided
and have failed to prevent the need for out-of-home placement, unless
the health, safety, and welfare of the child cannot be protected
adequately in the home, and that:
(a) There is no parent or guardian available to care for such
child;
(b) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian is not willing to take
custody of the child; or
(c) The court finds, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, a
manifest danger exists that the child will suffer serious abuse or
neglect if the child is not removed from the home and an order under
RCW 26.44.063 would not protect the child from danger.
(((4))) (6) If the court has ordered a child removed from his or
her home pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section, the court shall
consider whether it is in a child's best interest to be placed with,
have contact with, or have visits with siblings.
(a) There shall be a presumption that such placement, contact, or
visits are in the best interests of the child provided that:
(i) The court has jurisdiction over all siblings subject to the
order of placement, contact, or visitation pursuant to petitions filed
under this chapter or the parents of a child for whom there is no
jurisdiction are willing to agree; and
(ii) There is no reasonable cause to believe that the health,
safety, or welfare of any child subject to the order of placement,
contact, or visitation would be jeopardized or that efforts to reunite
the parent and child would be hindered by such placement, contact, or
visitation. In no event shall parental visitation time be reduced in
order to provide sibling visitation.
(b) The court may also order placement, contact, or visitation of
a child with a step-brother or step-sister provided that in addition to
the factors in (a) of this subsection, the child has a relationship and
is comfortable with the step-sibling.
(((5))) (7) If the court has ordered a child removed from his or
her home pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section and placed into
nonparental or nonrelative care, the court shall order a placement that
allows the child to remain in the same school he or she attended prior
to the initiation of the dependency proceeding when such a placement is
practical and in the child's best interest.
(((6))) (8) If the court has ordered a child removed from his or
her home pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section, the court may
order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child
relationship be filed if the requirements of RCW 13.34.132 are met.
(((7))) (9) If there is insufficient information at the time of the
disposition hearing upon which to base a determination regarding the
suitability of a proposed placement with a relative or other suitable
person, the child shall remain in foster care and the court shall
direct the department or supervising agency to conduct necessary
background investigations as provided in chapter 74.15 RCW and report
the results of such investigation to the court within thirty days.
However, if such relative or other person appears otherwise suitable
and competent to provide care and treatment, the criminal history
background check need not be completed before placement, but as soon as
possible after placement. Any placements with relatives or other
suitable persons, pursuant to this section, shall be contingent upon
cooperation by the relative or other suitable person with the agency
case plan and compliance with court orders related to the care and
supervision of the child including, but not limited to, court orders
regarding parent-child contacts, sibling contacts, and any other
conditions imposed by the court. Noncompliance with the case plan or
court order shall be grounds for removal of the child from the
relative's or other suitable person's home, subject to review by the
court.
Sec. 2 RCW 13.34.215 and 2010 c 180 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A child may petition the juvenile court to reinstate the
previously terminated parental rights of his or her parent under the
following circumstances:
(a) The child was previously found to be a dependent child under
this chapter;
(b) The child's parent's rights were terminated in a proceeding
under this chapter;
(c)(i) The child has not achieved his or her permanency plan
((within three years of a final order of termination)); or
(ii) While the child achieved a permanency plan, it has not since
been sustained;
(d) Three years have passed since the final order of termination
was entered; and
(((d))) (e) The child must be at least twelve years old at the time
the petition is filed. Upon the child's motion for good cause shown,
or on its own motion, the court may hear a petition filed by a child
younger than twelve years old.
(2) If the child is eligible to petition the juvenile court under
subsection (1) of this section and a parent whose rights have been
previously terminated contacts the department or supervising agency or
the child's guardian ad litem regarding reinstatement, the department
or supervising agency or the guardian ad litem must notify the eligible
child about his or her right to petition for reinstatement of parental
rights.
(3) A child seeking to petition under this section shall be
provided counsel at no cost to the child.
(4) The petition must be signed by the child in the absence of a
showing of good cause as to why the child could not do so.
(5) If, after a threshold hearing to consider the parent's apparent
fitness and interest in reinstatement of parental rights, the court
finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the best interests of the
child may be served by reinstatement of parental rights, the juvenile
court shall order that a hearing on the merits of the petition be held.
(6) The court shall give prior notice for any proceeding under this
section, or cause prior notice to be given, to the department or the
supervising agency, the child's attorney, and the child. The court
shall also order the department or supervising agency to give prior
notice of any hearing to the child's former parent whose parental
rights are the subject of the petition, any parent whose rights have
not been terminated, the child's current foster parent, relative
caregiver, guardian or custodian, and the child's tribe, if applicable.
(7) The juvenile court shall conditionally grant the petition if it
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has not achieved
his or her permanency plan and is not likely to imminently achieve his
or her permanency plan and that reinstatement of parental rights is in
the child's best interest. In determining whether reinstatement is in
the child's best interest the court shall consider, but is not limited
to, the following:
(a) Whether the parent whose rights are to be reinstated is a fit
parent and has remedied his or her deficits as provided in the record
of the prior termination proceedings and prior termination order;
(b) The age and maturity of the child, and the ability of the child
to express his or her preference;
(c) Whether the reinstatement of parental rights will present a
risk to the child's health, welfare, or safety; and
(d) Other material changes in circumstances, if any, that may have
occurred which warrant the granting of the petition.
(8) In determining whether the child has or has not achieved his or
her permanency plan or whether the child is likely to achieve his or
her permanency plan, the department or supervising agency shall provide
the court, and the court shall review, information related to any
efforts to achieve the permanency plan including efforts to achieve
adoption or a permanent guardianship.
(9)(a) If the court conditionally grants the petition under
subsection (7) of this section, the case will be continued for six
months and a temporary order of reinstatement entered. During this
period, the child shall be placed in the custody of the parent. The
department or supervising agency shall develop a permanency plan for
the child reflecting the plan to be reunification and shall provide
transition services to the family as appropriate.
(b) If the child must be removed from the parent due to abuse or
neglect allegations prior to the expiration of the conditional six-month period, the court shall dismiss the petition for reinstatement of
parental rights if the court finds the allegations have been proven by
a preponderance of the evidence.
(c) If the child has been successfully placed with the parent for
six months, the court order reinstating parental rights remains in
effect and the court shall dismiss the dependency.
(10) After the child has been placed with the parent for six
months, the court shall hold a hearing. If the placement with the
parent has been successful, the court shall enter a final order of
reinstatement of parental rights, which shall restore all rights,
powers, privileges, immunities, duties, and obligations of the parent
as to the child, including those relating to custody, control, and
support of the child. The court shall dismiss the dependency and
direct the clerk's office to provide a certified copy of the final
order of reinstatement of parental rights to the parent at no cost.
(11) The granting of the petition under this section does not
vacate or otherwise affect the validity of the original termination
order.
(12) Any parent whose rights are reinstated under this section
shall not be liable for any child support owed to the department
pursuant to RCW 13.34.160 or Title 26 RCW or costs of other services
provided to a child for the time period from the date of termination of
parental rights to the date parental rights are reinstated.
(13) A proceeding to reinstate parental rights is a separate action
from the termination of parental rights proceeding and does not vacate
the original termination of parental rights. An order granted under
this section reinstates the parental rights to the child. This
reinstatement is a recognition that the situation of the parent and
child have changed since the time of the termination of parental rights
and reunification is now appropriate.
(14) This section is retroactive and applies to any child who is
under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court at the time of the hearing
regardless of the date parental rights were terminated.
(15) The state, the department, the supervising agency, and its
employees are not liable for civil damages resulting from any act or
omission in the provision of services under this section, unless the
act or omission constitutes gross negligence. This section does not
create any duty and shall not be construed to create a duty where none
exists. This section does not create a cause of action against the
state, the department, the supervising agency, or its employees
concerning the original termination.
Sec. 3 RCW 26.33.070 and 1984 c 155 s 7 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for any parent or
alleged father under eighteen years of age in any proceeding under this
chapter. The court may appoint a guardian ad litem for a child adoptee
or any incompetent party in any proceeding under this chapter. The
guardian ad litem for a parent or alleged father, in addition to
determining what is in the best interest of the party, shall make an
investigation and report to the court concerning whether any written
consent to adoption or petition for relinquishment signed by the parent
or alleged father was signed voluntarily and with an understanding of
the consequences of the action. If the child to be relinquished is a
dependent child under chapter 13.34 RCW and the minor parent is
represented by an attorney or guardian ad litem in the dependency
proceeding, the court may rely on the minor parent's dependency court
attorney or guardian ad litem to make a report to the court as provided
in this subsection.
(2) The court in the county in which a petition is filed shall
direct who shall pay the fees of a guardian ad litem or attorney
appointed under this chapter and shall approve the payment of the fees.
If the court orders the parties to pay the fees of the guardian ad
litem, the fees must be established pursuant to the procedures in RCW
26.12.183.
Sec. 4 RCW 26.09.220 and 1993 c 289 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) The court may order an investigation and report concerning
parenting arrangements for the child, or may appoint a guardian ad
litem pursuant to RCW 26.12.175, or both. The investigation and report
may be made by the guardian ad litem, court-appointed special advocate,
the staff of the juvenile court, or other professional social service
organization experienced in counseling children and families.
(b) An investigator is a person appointed as an investigator under
RCW 26.12.050(1)(b) or any other third-party professional ordered or
appointed by the court to provide an opinion, assessment, or evaluation
regarding the creation or modification of a parenting plan.
(2) In preparing the report concerning a child, the investigator or
person appointed under subsection (1) of this section may consult any
person who may have information about the child and the potential
parenting or custodian arrangements. Upon order of the court, the
investigator or person appointed under subsection (1) of this section
may refer the child to professional personnel for diagnosis. The
investigator or person appointed under subsection (1) of this section
may consult with and obtain information from medical, psychiatric, or
other expert persons who have served the child in the past without
obtaining the consent of the parent or the child's custodian; but the
child's consent must be obtained if the child has reached the age of
twelve, unless the court finds that the child lacks mental capacity to
consent. If the requirements of subsection (3) of this section are
fulfilled, the ((investigator's)) report by the investigator or person
appointed under subsection (1) of this section may be received in
evidence at the hearing.
(3) The investigator or person appointed under subsection (1) of
this section shall ((mail the investigator's)) provide his or her
report to counsel and to any party not represented by counsel at least
ten days prior to the hearing unless a shorter time is ordered by the
court for good cause shown. The investigator or person appointed under
subsection (1) of this section shall make available to counsel and to
any party not represented by counsel ((the investigator's)) his or her
file of underlying data and reports, complete texts of diagnostic
reports made to the investigator or appointed person pursuant to the
provisions of subsection (2) of this section, and the names and
addresses of all persons whom ((the investigator)) he or she has
consulted. Any party to the proceeding may call the investigator or
person appointed under subsection (1) of this section and any person
whom the investigator or appointed person has consulted for cross-examination. A party may not waive the right of cross-examination
prior to the hearing.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5 A new section is added to chapter 26.12 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The court may appoint an investigator in addition to a guardian
ad litem or court-appointed special advocate under RCW 26.12.175 and
26.12.177 to assist the court and make recommendations.
(2) An investigator is a person appointed as an investigator under
RCW 26.12.050(1)(b) or any other third-party professional ordered or
appointed by the court to provide an opinion, assessment, or evaluation
regarding the creation or modification of a parenting plan.
(3) Investigators who are not supervised by a guardian ad litem or
by a court-appointed special advocate program must comply with the
training requirements applicable to guardians ad litem or court-appointed special advocates as provided under this chapter and court
rule.
Sec. 6 RCW 26.12.175 and 2009 c 480 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) The court may appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the
interests of a minor or dependent child when the court believes the
appointment of a guardian ad litem is necessary to protect the best
interests of the child in any proceeding under this chapter. The court
may appoint a guardian ad litem from the court-appointed special
advocate program, if that program exists in the county. The court
shall attempt to match a child with special needs with a guardian ad
litem who has specific training or education related to the child's
individual needs. The family court services professionals may also
make a recommendation to the court regarding whether a guardian ad
litem should be appointed for the child.
(b) The guardian ad litem's role is to investigate and report
factual information regarding the issues ordered to be reported or
investigated to the court. The guardian ad litem shall always
represent the best interests of the child. Guardians ad litem ((and
investigators)) under this title may make recommendations based upon
his or her investigation, which the court may consider and weigh in
conjunction with the recommendations of all of the parties. If a child
expresses a preference regarding the parenting plan, the guardian ad
litem shall report the preferences to the court, together with the
facts relative to whether any preferences are being expressed
voluntarily and the degree of the child's understanding. The court may
require the guardian ad litem to provide periodic reports to the
parties regarding the status of his or her investigation. The guardian
ad litem shall file his or her report at least sixty days prior to
trial.
(c) The parties to the proceeding may file with the court written
responses to any report filed by the guardian ad litem ((or
investigator)). The court shall consider any written responses to a
report filed by the guardian ad litem ((or investigator)), including
any factual information or recommendations provided in the report.
(d) The court shall enter an order for costs, fees, and
disbursements to cover the costs of the guardian ad litem. The court
may order either or both parents to pay for the costs of the guardian
ad litem, according to their ability to pay. If both parents are
indigent, the county shall bear the cost of the guardian, subject to
appropriation for guardians' ad litem services by the county
legislative authority. Guardians ad litem who are not volunteers shall
provide the parties with an itemized accounting of their time and
billing for services each month.
(2)(a) If the guardian ad litem appointed is from the county court-appointed special advocate program, the program shall supervise any
guardian ad litem assigned to the case. The court-appointed special
advocate program shall be entitled to notice of all proceedings in the
case.
(b) The legislative authority of each county may authorize creation
of a court-appointed special advocate program. The county legislative
authority may adopt rules of eligibility for court-appointed special
advocate program services that are not inconsistent with this section.
(3) Each guardian ad litem program for compensated guardians ad
litem and each court-appointed special advocate program shall maintain
a background information record for each guardian ad litem in the
program. The background information record shall include, but is not
limited to, the following information:
(a) Level of formal education;
(b) General training related to the guardian ad litem's duties;
(c) Specific training related to issues potentially faced by
children in dissolution, custody, paternity, and other family law
proceedings;
(d) Specific training or education related to child disability or
developmental issues;
(e) Number of years' experience as a guardian ad litem;
(f) Number of appointments as a guardian ad litem and county or
counties of appointment;
(g) The names of any counties in which the person was removed from
a guardian ad litem registry pursuant to a grievance action, and the
name of the court and the cause number of any case in which the court
has removed the person for cause;
(h) Founded allegations of abuse or neglect as defined in RCW
26.44.020;
(i) The results of an examination that shall consist of a
background check as allowed through the Washington state criminal
records privacy act under RCW 10.97.050 and the Washington state patrol
criminal identification system under RCW 43.43.832 through 43.43.834.
This background check shall be done through the Washington state patrol
criminal identification section; and
(j) Criminal history, as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, for the period
covering ten years prior to the appointment.
The background information record shall be updated annually. As a
condition of appointment, the guardian ad litem's background
information record shall be made available to the court. If the
appointed guardian ad litem is not a member of a guardian ad litem
program the person appointed as guardian ad litem shall provide the
background information record to the court.
Upon appointment, the guardian ad litem, court-appointed special
advocate program or guardian ad litem program, shall provide the
parties or their attorneys with a copy of the background information
record. The portion of the background information record containing
the results of the criminal background check and the criminal history
shall not be disclosed to the parties or their attorneys. The
background information record shall not include identifying information
that may be used to harm a guardian ad litem, such as home addresses
and home telephone numbers, and for volunteer guardians ad litem the
court may allow the use of maiden names or pseudonyms as necessary for
their safety.
(4) When a court-appointed special advocate or volunteer guardian
ad litem is requested on a case, the program shall give the court the
name of the person it recommends. The court shall immediately appoint
the person recommended by the program.
(5) If a party in a case reasonably believes the court-appointed
special advocate or volunteer guardian ad litem is inappropriate or
unqualified, the party may request a review of the appointment by the
program. The program must complete the review within five judicial
days and remove any appointee for good cause. If the party seeking the
review is not satisfied with the outcome of the review, the party may
file a motion with the court for the removal of the court-appointed
special advocate or volunteer guardian ad litem on the grounds the
advocate or volunteer is inappropriate or unqualified.
Sec. 7 RCW 26.12.177 and 2009 c 480 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) All guardians ad litem ((and investigators)) appointed under
this title must comply with the training requirements established under
RCW 2.56.030(15), prior to their appointment in cases under Title 26
RCW, except that volunteer guardians ad litem or court-appointed
special advocates may comply with alternative training requirements
approved by the administrative office of the courts that meet or exceed
the statewide requirements. In cases involving allegations of limiting
factors under RCW 26.09.191, the guardians ad litem ((and
investigators)) appointed under this title must have additional
relevant training under RCW 2.56.030(15) ((and as recommended under RCW
2.53.040,)) when it is available.
(2)(a) Each guardian ad litem program for compensated guardians ad
litem shall establish a rotational registry system for the appointment
of guardians ad litem ((and investigators)) under this title. If a
judicial district does not have a program the court shall establish the
rotational registry system. Guardians ad litem ((and investigators))
under this title shall be selected from the registry except in
exceptional circumstances as determined and documented by the court.
The parties may make a joint recommendation for the appointment of a
guardian ad litem from the registry.
(b) In judicial districts with a population over one hundred
thousand, a list of three names shall be selected from the registry and
given to the parties along with the background information record as
specified in RCW 26.12.175(3), including their hourly rate for
services. Each party may, within three judicial days, strike one name
from the list. If more than one name remains on the list, the court
shall make the appointment from the names on the list. In the event
all three names are stricken the person whose name appears next on the
registry shall be appointed.
(c) If a party reasonably believes that the appointed guardian ad
litem is inappropriate or unqualified, charges an hourly rate higher
than what is reasonable for the particular proceeding, or has a
conflict of interest, the party may, within three judicial days from
the appointment, move for substitution of the appointed guardian ad
litem by filing a motion with the court.
(d) Under this section, within either registry referred to in (a)
of this subsection, a subregistry may be created that consists of
guardians ad litem under contract with the department of social and
health services' division of child support. Guardians ad litem on such
a subregistry shall be selected and appointed in state-initiated
paternity cases only.
(e) The superior court shall remove any person from the guardian ad
litem registry who has been found to have misrepresented his or her
qualifications.
(3) The rotational registry system shall not apply to court-appointed special advocate programs."
ESHB 1774 -
By Senators Hargrove, Stevens
ADOPTED 04/07/2011
On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "Relating to" strike the remainder of the title and insert "dependency matters; amending RCW 13.34.130, 13.34.215, 26.33.070, 26.09.220, 26.12.175, and 26.12.177; and adding a new section to chapter 26.12 RCW."
EFFECT: Allows the department to consider placement of a dependent child with a person with whom the child's sibling or half- sibling is residing or a person who has adopted the sibling or half- sibling of the dependent child. Allows a child to seek to reinstate his or her parent's previously terminated parental rights if the child has not achieved his or her permanent plan; or even though the plan has been achieved, it has not been sustained; and 3 years have passed since the final order terminating parental rights. Allows the court, in adoption proceedings, to order the parties, as opposed to the county, to pay the fee of the guardian ad litem (GAL) or attorney. Allows the court, in an adoption proceeding involving a dependent child, to rely on certain reports from the GAL or attorney representing the child's parent in the dependency proceeding. Defines the term "investigator" for the purposes of family law cases and requires investigators who are not supervised by a GAL or court-appointed special advocate to comply with training requirements.