BILL REQ. #: H-0604.4
State of Washington | 62nd Legislature | 2011 Regular Session |
Read first time 02/02/11. Referred to Committee on Higher Education.
AN ACT Relating to the higher education opportunity act; amending RCW 28B.15.067, 28B.15.068, 28B.76.270, 28B.92.060, and 28B.95.150; adding a new section to chapter 28B.10 RCW; creating new sections; and repealing RCW 28B.10.920, 28B.10.921, and 28B.10.922.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature finds that in the
knowledge-based, globally interdependent economy of the twenty-first
century, postsecondary education is the most indispensable form of
currency. Public institutions of higher education are drivers of
economic growth and job creation and incubators for innovation.
However, at the same time, the legislature finds that Washington state
is experiencing a profound structural shift in the funding of higher
education. State support has declined dramatically over the past
twenty years, thereby necessitating increases in tuition to supplant
the support of higher education from general taxpayers. The problem
faced by all stakeholders - students and their families, institutions,
and policymakers - is insufficient visibility into the use of locally
retained tuition dollars. There is little transparency regarding
whether increasing tuition dollars gives students, their families, and
Washington taxpayers a high-value return on investment.
(2) It is the intent of the legislature to:
(a) Ensure that tuition dollars are spent to improve student
access, affordability, and the quality of education;
(b) Establish a clear nexus between tuition dollars and improved
productivity and greater accountability of public institutions of
higher education; and
(c) Create a modern and robust higher education financial system
that funds outcomes and results rather than input and process.
Sec. 2 RCW 28B.15.067 and 2010 c 20 s 7 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Tuition fees shall be established under the provisions of this
chapter.
(2) ((Beginning with the 2003-04 academic year and ending with the
2012-13 academic year, reductions or increases in full-time tuition
fees for resident undergraduates shall be as provided in the omnibus
appropriations act)) Beginning in the 2011-12 academic year, reductions
or increases in full-time tuition fees shall be as provided in the
omnibus appropriations act for resident undergraduate students at
community and technical colleges. If the state board for community and
technical colleges does not raise tuition up to the limit provided in
the omnibus appropriations act, the individual governing boards of each
community and technical college may raise tuition at their institution
up to the limit.
(3)(a) Beginning with the ((2003-04)) 2011-12 academic year and
ending with the ((2012-13)) 2015-16 academic year, the governing boards
of the state universities, the regional universities, and The Evergreen
State College((, and the state board for community and technical
colleges)) may reduce or increase full-time tuition fees for all
students ((other than resident undergraduates)), including summer
school students and students in other self-supporting degree programs.
Percentage increases in full-time tuition fees may exceed the fiscal
growth factor. Reductions or increases may be made for all or portions
of an institution's programs, campuses, courses, or students. This
subsection (3)(a) applies to the state board for community and
technical colleges for all nonresident students, summer school
students, and students in other self-supporting programs.
(b) Prior to reducing or increasing tuition for each academic year,
the governing boards of the state universities, the regional
universities, and The Evergreen State College shall consult with
existing student associations or organizations with student
undergraduate and graduate representatives regarding the impacts of
potential tuition increases. Governing boards shall be required to
provide data regarding the percentage of students receiving financial
aid, the sources of aid, and the percentage of total costs of
attendance paid for by aid.
(c) Prior to reducing or increasing tuition for each academic year,
each college in the state board for community and technical college
system shall consult with existing student associations or
organizations with undergraduate student representation regarding the
impacts of potential tuition increases. Colleges shall provide data
regarding the percentage of students receiving financial aid, the
sources of aid, and the percentage of total costs of attendance paid
for by aid.
(4) ((Academic year tuition for full-time students at the state's
institutions of higher education beginning with 2015-16, other than
summer term, shall be as charged during the 2014-15 academic year
unless different rates are adopted by the legislature.)) The tuition fees established under this chapter shall not
apply to high school students enrolling in participating institutions
of higher education under RCW 28A.600.300 through 28A.600.400.
(5)
(((6))) (5) The tuition fees established under this chapter shall
not apply to eligible students enrolling in a dropout reengagement
program through an interlocal agreement between a school district and
a community or technical college under RCW 28A.175.100 through
28A.175.110.
(((7))) (6) The tuition fees established under this chapter shall
not apply to eligible students enrolling in a community or technical
college participating in the pilot program under RCW 28B.50.534 for the
purpose of obtaining a high school diploma.
(((8) For the academic years 2003-04 through 2008-09, the
University of Washington shall use an amount equivalent to ten percent
of all revenues received as a result of law school tuition increases
beginning in academic year 2000-01 through academic year 2008-09 to
assist needy low and middle-income resident law students.))
(9) For the academic years 2003-04 through 2008-09, institutions of
higher education shall use an amount equivalent to ten percent of all
revenues received as a result of graduate academic school tuition
increases beginning in academic year 2003-04 through academic year
2008-09 to assist needy low and middle-income resident graduate
academic students.
(10) Any tuition increases above seven percent shall fund costs of
instruction, library and student services, utilities and maintenance,
other costs related to instruction as well as institutional financial
aid. Through 2010-11, any funding reductions to instruction, library
and student services, utilities and maintenance and other costs related
to instruction shall be proportionally less than other program areas
including administration.
(7) Beginning January 1, 2012, each four-year institution of higher
education that raises tuition above seven percent must retain half of
the additional revenue for the express purpose of supporting financial
aid programs for middle class students with incomes up to one hundred
twenty-five percent of the median family income and mitigating the
effect of tuition increases for the middle class.
Sec. 3 RCW 28B.15.068 and 2009 c 540 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) ((Beginning with the 2007-08 academic year and ending with the
2016-17 academic year, tuition fees charged to full-time resident
undergraduate students, except in academic years 2009-10 and 2010-11,
may increase no greater than seven percent over the previous academic
year in any institution of higher education. Annual reductions or
increases in full-time tuition fees for resident undergraduate students
shall be as provided in the omnibus appropriations act, within the
seven percent increase limit established in this section. For academic
years 2009-10 and 2010-11 the omnibus appropriations act may provide
tuition increases greater than seven percent.)) To the extent that
state appropriations combined with tuition and fee revenues are
insufficient to achieve the total per-student funding goals established
in subsection (2) of this section, the legislature may revisit state
appropriations, authorized enrollment levels, and changes in tuition
fees for any given fiscal year.
(2) The state shall adopt as its goal total per-student funding
levels, from state appropriations plus tuition and fees, of at least
the sixtieth percentile of total per-student funding at similar public
institutions of higher education in the global challenge states. In
defining comparable per-student funding levels, the office of financial
management shall adjust for regional cost-of-living differences; for
differences in program offerings and in the relative mix of lower
division, upper division, and graduate students; and for accounting and
reporting differences among the comparison institutions. The office of
financial management shall develop a funding trajectory for each four-year institution of higher education and for the community and
technical college system as a whole that when combined with tuition and
fees revenue allows the state to achieve its funding goal for each
four-year institution and the community and technical college system as
a whole no later than fiscal year 2017. The state shall not reduce
enrollment levels below fiscal year 2007 budgeted levels in order to
improve or alter the per-student funding amount at any four-year
institution of higher education or the community and technical college
system as a whole. The state recognizes that each four-year
institution of higher education and the community and technical college
system as a whole have different funding requirements to achieve
desired performance levels, and that increases to the total per-student
funding amount may need to exceed the minimum funding goal.
(3) By September 1st of each year beginning in 2008, the office of
financial management shall report to the governor, the higher education
coordinating board, and appropriate committees of the legislature with
updated estimates of the total per-student funding level that
represents the sixtieth percentile of funding for comparable
institutions of higher education in the global challenge states, and
the progress toward that goal that was made for each of the public
institutions of higher education.
(4) As used in this section, "global challenge states" are the top
performing states on the new economy index published by the progressive
policy institute as of July 22, 2007. The new economy index ranks
states on indicators of their potential to compete in the new economy.
At least once every five years, the office of financial management
shall determine if changes to the list of global challenge states are
appropriate. The office of financial management shall report its
findings to the governor and the legislature.
(5)(a) During the ((2009-10)) 2011-12 and the ((2010-11)) 2012-13
academic years, institutions of higher education shall include
information on their billing statements notifying students of tax
credits available through the American opportunity tax credit provided
in the American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009, the lifetime
learning credit and other relevant tax credits available to mitigate
the costs of attending college. All institutions of higher education
and the higher education coordinating board shall use all reasonable
means of communication such as web sites, online catalogues, admission
and registration forms, among other methods to communicate the tax
credits available to students.
(b) All four-year institutions of higher education and the state
board for community and technical colleges shall report to the higher
education coordinating board on the methods used to communicate tax
credits to students by November 30, 2011, and October 30, 2012. The
higher education coordinating board shall report to the legislature on
the types of methods used to communicate tax credits available to
students and recommendations on effectiveness by January 1, 2013.
Sec. 4 RCW 28B.76.270 and 2004 c 275 s 11 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The board shall establish an accountability monitoring and
reporting system as part of a continuing effort to make meaningful and
substantial progress towards the achievement of long-term performance
goals in higher education.
(2) To provide consistent, easily understood data among the public
four-year institutions of higher education within Washington and in
other states, the following data must be reported annually and at a
minimum include data recommended by a national organization
representing state chief executives. This data must include the
following for the four-year institutions of higher education and the
board may change the data requirements to be consistent with best
practices across the country:
(a) Bachelor's degrees awarded;
(b) Graduation rates: The number and percentage of students who
graduate within four years for bachelor's degrees and within the
extended time, which is six years for bachelor's degrees;
(c) Transfer rates: The annual number and percentage of students
who transfer from a two-year to a four-year institution of higher
education;
(d) Time and credits to degree: The average length of time in
years and average number of credits that graduating students took to
earn a bachelor's degree;
(e) Enrollment in remedial education: The number and percentage of
entering first-time undergraduate students who place into and enroll in
remedial mathematics, English, or both;
(f) Success beyond remedial education: The number and percentage
of entering first-time undergraduate students who complete entry
college-level math and English courses within the first two consecutive
academic years;
(g) Credit accumulation: The number and percentage of first-time
undergraduate students completing two quarters or one semester worth of
credit during their first academic year;
(h) Retention rates: The number and percentage of entering
undergraduate students who enroll consecutively from fall-to-spring and
fall-to-fall at an institution of higher education; and
(i) Course completion: The percentage of credit hours completed
out of those attempted during an academic year.
(3) Four-year institutions of higher education must count all
students when collecting data for these metrics, not only first-time,
full-time freshmen.
(4) Based on guidelines prepared by the board, each four-year
institution under section 7 of this act, and the state board for
community and technical colleges shall submit a biennial plan to
achieve measurable and specific improvements each academic year on
statewide and institution-specific performance measures. Plans shall
be submitted to the board along with the biennial budget requests from
the institutions and the state board for community and technical
colleges. Performance measures established for the community and
technical colleges shall reflect the role and mission of the colleges.
(((3))) (5) The board shall approve biennial performance targets
for each four-year institution and for the community and technical
college system and shall review actual achievements annually. The
state board for community and technical colleges shall set biennial
performance targets for each college or district, where appropriate.
(((4))) (6) The board shall submit a report on progress towards the
statewide goals, with recommendations for the ensuing biennium, to the
fiscal and higher education committees of the legislature along with
the board's biennial budget recommendations.
(((5))) (7) The board, in collaboration with the four-year
institutions and the state board for community and technical colleges,
shall periodically review and update the accountability monitoring and
reporting system.
(((6))) (8) The board shall develop measurable indicators and
benchmarks for its own performance regarding cost, quantity, quality,
and timeliness and including the performance of committees and advisory
groups convened under this chapter to accomplish such tasks as
improving transfer and articulation, improving articulation with the K-12 education system, measuring educational costs, or developing data
protocols. The board shall submit its accountability plan to the
legislature concurrently with the biennial report on institution
progress.
(9) In conjunction with the office of financial management, all
four-year institutions of higher education must display the data
described in subsection (2) of this section in a uniform dashboard
format on the office of financial management's web site no later than
December 1, 2011, and updated thereafter annually by December 1st. To
the maximum extent possible, the information must be viewable by race
and ethnicity, gender, state and county of origin, and age. The
information may be tailored to meet the needs of various target
audiences such as students, researchers, and the general public.
Sec. 5 RCW 28B.92.060 and 2009 c 215 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
In awarding need grants, the board shall proceed substantially as
follows: PROVIDED, That nothing contained herein shall be construed to
prevent the board, in the exercise of its sound discretion, from
following another procedure when the best interest of the program so
dictates:
(1) The board shall annually select the financial aid award
recipients from among Washington residents applying for student
financial aid who have been ranked according to:
(a) Financial need as determined by the amount of the family
contribution; and
(b) Other considerations, such as whether the student is a former
foster youth, or is a placebound student who has completed an associate
of arts or associate of science degree or its equivalent.
(2) The financial need of the highest ranked students shall be met
by grants depending upon the evaluation of financial need until the
total allocation has been disbursed. Funds from grants which are
declined, forfeited or otherwise unused shall be reawarded until
disbursed, except that eligible former foster youth shall be assured
receipt of a grant. The board shall develop award criteria and methods
of disbursement based on level of need, and not solely rely on a first-come, first-served basis.
(3) A student shall be eligible to receive a state need grant for
up to five years, or the credit or clock hour equivalent of five years,
or up to one hundred twenty-five percent of the published length of
time of the student's program. A student may not start a new associate
degree program as a state need grant recipient until at least five
years have elapsed since earning an associate degree as a need grant
recipient, except that a student may earn two associate degrees
concurrently. Qualifications for renewal will include maintaining
satisfactory academic progress toward completion of an eligible program
as determined by the board. Should the recipient terminate his or her
enrollment for any reason during the academic year, the unused portion
of the grant shall be returned to the state educational grant fund by
the institution according to the institution's own policy for issuing
refunds, except as provided in RCW 28B.92.070.
(4) In computing financial need, the board:
(a) Shall determine a maximum student expense budget allowance, not
to exceed an amount equal to the total maximum student expense budget
at the public institutions plus the current average state appropriation
per student for operating expense in the public institutions. Any
child support payments received by students who are parents attending
less than half-time shall not be used in computing financial need; and
(b) May take into account the number of children in a family when
determining family contribution.
(5)(a) A student who is enrolled in three to six credit-bearing
quarter credits, or the equivalent semester credits, may receive a
grant for up to one academic year before beginning a program that leads
to a degree or certificate.
(b) An eligible student enrolled on a less-than-full-time basis
shall receive a prorated portion of his or her state need grant for any
academic period in which he or she is enrolled on a less-than-full-time
basis, as long as funds are available.
(c) An institution of higher education may award a state need grant
to an eligible student enrolled in three to six credit-bearing quarter
credits, or the semester equivalent, on a provisional basis if:
(i) The student has not previously received a state need grant from
that institution;
(ii) The student completes the required free application for
federal student aid;
(iii) The institution has reviewed the student's financial
condition, and the financial condition of the student's family if the
student is a dependent student, and has determined that the student is
likely eligible for a state need grant; and
(iv) The student has signed a document attesting to the fact that
the financial information provided on the free application for federal
student aid and any additional financial information provided directly
to the institution is accurate and complete, and that the student
agrees to repay the institution for the grant amount if the student
submitted false or incomplete information.
(6) As used in this section, "former foster youth" means a person
who is at least eighteen years of age, but not more than twenty-four
years of age, who was a dependent of the department of social and
health services at the time he or she attained the age of eighteen.
Sec. 6 RCW 28B.95.150 and 2001 c 184 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The committee may establish a college savings program. If such
a program is established, the college savings program shall be
established, in such form as may be determined by the committee, to be
a qualified state tuition program as defined by the internal revenue
service under section 529 of the internal revenue code, and shall be
administered in a manner consistent with the Washington advanced
college tuition payment program. The committee, in planning and
devising the program, shall consult with the state investment board,
the state treasurer, a qualified actuarial consulting firm with
appropriate expertise to evaluate such plans, the legislative fiscal
and higher education committees, and the institutions of higher
education.
(2) Up to two hundred thousand dollars of administrative fees
collected from guaranteed education tuition program participants may be
applied as a loan to fund the development of a college savings program.
This loan must be repaid with interest before the conclusion of the
biennium in which the committee draws funds for this purpose from the
advanced college tuition payment program account.
(3) If such a college savings program is established, the college
savings program account is created in the custody of the state
treasurer for the purpose of administering the college savings program.
If created, the account shall be a discrete nontreasury account in the
custody of the state treasurer. Interest earnings shall be retained in
accordance with RCW 43.79A.040. Disbursements from the account, except
for program administration, are exempt from appropriations and the
allotment provisions of chapter 43.88 RCW. Money used for program
administration is subject to the allotment provisions, but without
appropriation.
(4) The committee, after consultation with the state investment
board, shall determine the investment policies for the college savings
program. Program contributions may be invested by the state investment
board or the committee may contract with an investment company licensed
to conduct business in this state to do the investing. The committee
shall keep or cause to be kept full and adequate accounts and records
of the assets of each individual participant in the college savings
program.
(5) Neither the state nor any eligible educational institution may
be considered or held to be an insurer of the funds or assets of the
individual participant accounts in the college savings program created
under this section nor may any such entity be held liable for any
shortage of funds in the event that balances in the individual
participant accounts are insufficient to meet the educational expenses
of the institution chosen by the student for which the individual
participant account was intended.
(6) The committee shall adopt rules to implement this section.
Such rules shall include but not be limited to administration,
investment management, promotion, and marketing; compliance with
internal revenue service standards; application procedures and fees;
start-up costs; phasing in the savings program and withdrawals
therefrom; deterrents to early withdrawals and provisions for hardship
withdrawals; and reenrollment in the savings program after withdrawal.
(7) The committee may, at its discretion, determine to cease
operation of the college savings program if it determines the
continuation is not in the best interest of the state. The committee
shall adopt rules to implement this section addressing the orderly
distribution of assets.
(8) The committee shall review tuition levels in relation to
savings to ensure the program remains viable for students and their
families. The committee shall report back to the legislature by
November 1, 2011, on recommendations for establishing a second phase of
the guaranteed education tuition program.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 28B.10 RCW
to read as follows:
Each four-year institution of higher education must develop
specific action plans to reach the goals under RCW 28B.76.270 and goals
to improve cost-effectiveness and efficiency. The individual
institutions must develop their campus goals recognizing the role of
their campus as part of the system of public higher education. The
plan and the results must be reported biennially to the governor, the
legislature, and the higher education coordinating board. Institutions
must report on innovations used to reach the targets, which may include
but not limited to:
(1) The innovative use of technology in instruction, particularly
for large introductory courses;
(2) Increasing administrative efficiencies among the institutions
and campuses;
(3) Eliminating underused majors and courses;
(4) Creating three-year bachelor degree programs;
(5) Increasing tuition for students taking credits beyond those
needed to earn a degree;
(6) Recognizing prior learning experiences based on competency
assessments; and
(7) Recognizing transfer credits, particularly credits earned in
academic programs at two-year and four-year institutions.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 The following acts or parts of acts are each
repealed:
(1) RCW 28B.10.920 (Performance agreements--Generally) and 2008 c
160 s 2;
(2) RCW 28B.10.921 (Performance agreements -- Contents) and 2008 c
160 s 3; and
(3) RCW 28B.10.922 (Performance agreements -- State committee--Development of final proposals -- Implementation -- Updates) and 2008 c 160
s 4.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9 The office of financial management shall
create a work group that includes representations from the higher
education coordinating board, the council of presidents, and four-year
institutions of higher education to identify statutory reporting and
accountability requirements that are duplicative, overly burdensome,
redundant, or ineffective, and develop recommendations for statutory
changes. The office of financial management shall provide
recommendations to the legislature by November 1, 2011.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10 This act may be known and cited as the
higher education opportunity act.