BILL REQ. #: S-3693.1
State of Washington | 62nd Legislature | 2012 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/12/12. Referred to Committee on Environment.
AN ACT Relating to modernizing the functionality of the state environmental policy act without compromising the underlying intent of the original legislation; amending RCW 43.21C.031, 43.21C.229, 43.21C.420, 36.70A.490, 36.70A.500, 82.02.020, 43.21C.110, and 43.21C.095; adding new sections to chapter 43.21C RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82.02 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 36.70B RCW; adding a new section to chapter 36.70 RCW; creating new sections; providing expiration dates; and repealing RCW 36.70B.110.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The categorical exemption board is created to serve as the
rule-making body for the provisions of this chapter expressly indicated
in section 2 of this act. Rules adopted by the categorical exemption
board are complementary to, and have the same force and effect as, the
rules adopted by the department of ecology under RCW 43.21C.110.
(2) The categorical exemption board is composed of the following
members:
(a) The director of the department of ecology or the director's
designee, who is responsible for serving as the chair for all official
board actions;
(b) The commissioner of public lands or the commissioner's
designee;
(c) One county planning director, appointed by the governor, who is
responsible for the implementation of this chapter for his or her
county;
(d) One city planning director, appointed by the governor, who is
responsible for the implementation of this chapter for his or her city;
(e) One representative of statewide environmental interests,
appointed by the governor;
(f) One representative of statewide business interests, appointed
by the governor; and
(g) One representative of an Indian tribe, appointed by the
governor.
(3) Each member of the categorical exemption board shall serve
four-year terms, except that the governor may appoint initial members
to the board in staggered terms so that the terms of no more than two
gubernatorial appointees expire in the same calendar year.
(4) The principal office of the categorical exemption board must be
in Thurston county. However, official meetings may be held at any
location or time designated by the chair of the board. Regardless of
meeting location, members of the categorical exemption board may
participate in official board activities through conference calls or
other remote location meeting technologies.
(5) Members of the categorical exemption board that are not state
employees are entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses related to
participation on the board consistent with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.
(6) Clerical and research staff support to the categorical
exemption board must be provided by the department of ecology. Support
to the board must be provided within the existing resources of the
department of ecology to the level necessary for the board to fulfill
its purpose.
(7) All rules adopted by the department of ecology under RCW
43.21C.110 that are within the jurisdiction of the categorical
exemption board outlined in section 2 of this act remain in effect.
However, the categorical exemption board assumes all responsibility and
authority for amending the rules.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The rule-making powers of the categorical exemption board
created in section 1 of this act are limited to the following phases of
interpretation and implementation of this chapter:
(a) Categories of governmental actions that are not to be
considered as potential major actions significantly affecting the
quality of the environment, including categories pertaining to
applications for water right permits pursuant to chapters 90.03 and
90.44 RCW. The types of actions included as categorical exemptions in
the rules must be limited to those types that are not major actions
significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The rules must
provide for certain circumstances where actions that potentially are
categorically exempt require environmental review.
(b) The environmental checklist process outlined in WAC 197-11-960,
as it existed on the effective date of this section.
(2) The duty of the categorical exemption board is to ensure that
categorical exemptions from this chapter and the environmental
checklist process outlined in WAC 197-11-960 are updated periodically
to reflect current conditions, to reduce duplicative rules and
regulations, and to contain avoidable costs while still meeting the
environmental review objectives of this chapter.
(3)(a) The categorical exemption board may, after December 31,
2013, periodically update the categorical exemptions from this chapter,
and the rules implementing those exceptions, to achieve the board
purposes outlined in this section.
(b) The chair of the categorical exemption board must convene a
board meeting for the purposes of implementing (a) of this subsection
upon the petition of any board member to review a categorical exemption
or the rules implementing a categorical exemption.
(c) Any party may petition the categorical exemption board,
pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW, for any rule making consistent with the
jurisdiction of the board as established in this section. However, the
chair of the board is not required to convene a meeting of the board
upon the petition of someone who is not a member of the board.
(4) All actions of the categorical exemption board must be
conducted consistent with chapter 34.05 RCW.
(5) An action that is categorically exempt under the rules adopted
by the categorical exemption board may not be conditioned or denied
under this chapter.
(6) The categorical exemption board may not adopt rules that:
(a) Relate to climate change; or
(b) Result in categorical exemptions that are lower than those that
were in effect on July 1, 2011.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 (1) The categorical exemption board created
in section 1 of this act must, by December 31, 2012, make immediate
changes to the categorical exemptions to chapter 43.21C RCW, and the
rules implementing those exemptions, to achieve the board purposes
outlined in section 2 of this act.
(2) The categorical exemption board must, by December 31, 2013,
adopt further updates to the categorical exemptions to chapter 43.21C
RCW, and the rules implementing those exemptions, to include higher
default levels and broader flexible levels than are specified in WAC
197-11-800(1)(c) as it existed on the effective date of this section.
(3) This section expires July 31, 2014.
Sec. 4 RCW 43.21C.031 and 1995 c 347 s 203 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) An environmental impact statement (the detailed statement
required by RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c)) shall be prepared on proposals for
legislation and other major actions having a probable significant,
adverse environmental impact. The environmental impact statement may
be combined with the recommendation or report on the proposal or issued
as a separate document. The substantive decisions or recommendations
shall be clearly identifiable in the combined document. Actions
categorically exempt under ((RCW 43.21C.110(1)(a))) section 2 of this
act do not require environmental review or the preparation of an
environmental impact statement under this chapter. ((In a county,
city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040, a planned action, as
provided for in subsection (2) of this section, does not require a
threshold determination or the preparation of an environmental impact
statement under this chapter, but is subject to environmental review
and mitigation as provided in this chapter.))
(2) An environmental impact statement is required to analyze only
those probable adverse environmental impacts which are significant.
Beneficial environmental impacts may be discussed. The responsible
official shall consult with agencies and the public to identify such
impacts and limit the scope of an environmental impact statement. The
subjects listed in RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) need not be treated as separate
sections of an environmental impact statement. Discussions of
significant short-term and long-term environmental impacts, significant
irrevocable commitments of natural resources, significant alternatives
including mitigation measures, and significant environmental impacts
which cannot be mitigated should be consolidated or included, as
applicable, in those sections of an environmental impact statement
where the responsible official decides they logically belong.
(((2)(a) For purposes of this section, a planned action means one
or more types of project action that:))
(i) Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution
adopted by a county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040;
(ii) Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an
environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with (A) a
comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or
(B) a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master
planned development, or a phased project;
(iii) Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals
listed in (a)(ii) of this subsection;
(iv) Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW
36.70A.030;
(v) Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW
36.70A.200; and
(vi) Are consistent with a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter
36.70A RCW.
(b) A county, city, or town shall limit planned actions to certain
types of development or to specific geographical areas that are less
extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the county, city, or
town and may limit a planned action to a time period identified in the
environmental impact statement or the ordinance or resolution adopted
under this subsection.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW
to read as follows:
(1) For purposes of this chapter, a planned action means one or
more types of development or redevelopment that meet the following
criteria:
(a) Are designated as planned actions by an ordinance or resolution
adopted by a county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040;
(b) Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an
environmental impact statement under the requirements of this chapter
in conjunction with, or to implement, a comprehensive plan or subarea
plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or a fully contained community,
a master planned resort, a master planned development, or a phased
project;
(c) Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals
listed in (b) of this subsection;
(d) Are located within an urban growth area designated pursuant to
RCW 36.70A.110;
(e) Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW
36.70A.200, unless an essential public facility is accessory to or part
of a residential, office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or
industrial development that is designated a planned action under this
subsection; and
(f) Are consistent with a comprehensive plan or subarea plan
adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW.
(2) A county, city, or town shall define the types of development
included in the planned action or a specific geographical area that is
less extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the county, city,
or town, and may limit a planned action to a time period identified in
the ordinance or resolution adopted under this subsection.
(3)(a) A county, city, or town shall determine during permit review
whether a proposal is consistent with a planned action ordinance
adopted by the jurisdiction. To determine project consistency with a
planned action ordinance, a county, city, or town may utilize the
environmental checklist, a modified checklist pursuant to the rules
adopted to implement RCW 43.21C.110, a form that is designated within
the planned action ordinance, or a form contained in agency rules
adopted pursuant to RCW 43.21C.120.
(b) Except for impacts that are specifically deferred for
consideration at the project level, a county, city, or town is not
required to make a threshold determination and may not require
additional environmental review for a proposal that is determined to be
consistent with the development or redevelopment described in the
planned action ordinance. The determination of consistency, and the
adequacy of any environmental review that was specifically deferred, is
subject to any administrative appeal that the county, city, or town
provides consistent with RCW 36.70B.060.
Sec. 6 RCW 43.21C.229 and 2003 c 298 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) In order to accommodate infill development and thereby realize
the goals and policies of comprehensive plans adopted according to
chapter 36.70A RCW, a city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 is
authorized by this section to establish categorical exemptions from the
requirements of this chapter. An exemption adopted under this section
applies even if it differs from the categorical exemptions adopted by
rule of the department under ((RCW 43.21C.110(1)(a))) section 2 of this
act. An exemption may be adopted by a city or county under this
section if it meets the following criteria:
(a) It categorically exempts government action related to
development ((that is new residential or mixed-use development))
proposed to fill in an urban growth area, designated according to RCW
36.70A.110, where current density and intensity of use in the area is
lower than called for in the goals and policies of the applicable
comprehensive plan and the development is either new:
(i) Residential development;
(ii) Mixed-use development;
(iii) Commercial development under ten thousand square feet; or
(iv) Industrial development;
(b) It does not exempt government action related to development
that would be for a use or would exceed the density or intensity of use
called for in the goals and policies of the applicable comprehensive
plan; and
(c)(i) The city or county's applicable comprehensive plan was
previously subjected to environmental analysis through an environmental
impact statement under the requirements of this chapter prior to
adoption; or
(ii) The city has prepared an environmental impact statement for
the area where the exemption created by this section applies if the
underlying environmental impact statement considered the proposed use
or intensity of use.
(2) Any categorical exemption adopted by a city or county under
this section shall be subject to the rules of the department adopted
according to ((RCW 43.21C.110(1)(a))) section 2 of this act that
provide exceptions to the use of categorical exemptions adopted by the
department.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW
to read as follows:
(1) This chapter does not apply to projects designed exclusively to
restore natural wildlife or fishery habitats or projects that serve as
environmental mitigation for other projects, except for:
(a) Projects that are stand-alone commercial wetland mitigation
banks located on more than five acres; and
(b) Projects that are fish hatcheries.
(2) The lead agency permitting a project that qualifies for an
exemption under this section must still consult with the department of
archaeology and historic preservation to evaluate any potential impacts
to historic or archaeological sites.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The legislature recognizes that a county, city, or town that
prepares a nonproject environmental review under RCW 43.21C.030(2),
including reviews necessary for compliance with RCW 43.21C.420, must
endure a substantial financial burden.
(2) A county, city, or town may recover reasonable expenses
incurred by the preparation of a nonproject environmental impact
statement prepared under RCW 43.21C.030(2):
(a) Through access to financial assistance under RCW 36.70A.490;
(b) With funding from private sources; and
(c) By the assessment of a reasonable and proportionate fee upon
subsequent development that is consistent with the plan and development
regulations adopted under RCW 43.21C.030(2), as long as the development
makes use of and benefits from, as described in RCW 43.21C.030(2), the
nonproject environmental review prepared by the county, city, or town.
(3) In order to collect fees under this section, the county, city,
or town must enact an ordinance that sets forth objective standards for
determining how the fees to be imposed upon each development will be
proportionate to the impacts of each development and to the benefits
accruing to each development from the nonproject environmental review.
(4) Any assessment of fees collected under this section from
subsequent development may be used to reimburse funding received from
private sources.
(5)(a) Any disagreement about the reasonableness or amount of the
fees imposed upon a development may not be the basis for delay in
issuance of a project permit for that development.
(b) The fee assessed by the county, city, or town may be paid with
the written stipulation "paid under protest" and, if the city provides
for an administrative appeal of its decision on the project for which
the fees are imposed, any dispute about the amount of the fees must be
resolved in the same administrative appeal process.
Sec. 9 RCW 43.21C.420 and 2010 c 153 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Cities with a population greater than five thousand, in
accordance with their existing comprehensive planning and development
regulation authority under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in accordance with
this section, may adopt optional elements of their comprehensive plans
and optional development regulations that apply within specified
subareas of the cities, that are either:
(a) Areas designated as mixed-use or urban centers in a land use or
transportation plan adopted by a regional transportation planning
organization; or
(b) Areas within one-half mile of a major transit stop that are
zoned to have an average minimum density of fifteen dwelling units or
more per gross acre.
(2) Cities located on the east side of the Cascade mountains and
located in a county with a population of two hundred thirty thousand or
less, in accordance with their existing comprehensive planning and
development regulation authority under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in
accordance with this section, may adopt optional elements of their
comprehensive plans and optional development regulations that apply
within the mixed-use or urban centers. The optional elements of their
comprehensive plans and optional development regulations must enhance
pedestrian, bicycle, transit, or other nonvehicular transportation
methods.
(3) A major transit stop is defined as:
(a) A stop on a high capacity transportation service funded or
expanded under the provisions of chapter 81.104 RCW;
(b) Commuter rail stops;
(c) Stops on rail or fixed guideway systems, including transitways;
(d) Stops on bus rapid transit routes or routes that run on high
occupancy vehicle lanes; or
(e) Stops for a bus or other transit mode providing fixed route
service at intervals of at least thirty minutes during the peak hours
of operation.
(4)(a) A city that elects to adopt such an optional comprehensive
plan element and optional development regulations shall prepare a
nonproject environmental impact statement, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030,
assessing and disclosing the probable significant adverse environmental
impacts of the optional comprehensive plan element and development
regulations and of future development that is consistent with the plan
and regulations.
(b) At least one community meeting must be held on the proposed
subarea plan before the scoping notice for such a nonproject
environmental impact statement is issued. Notice of scoping for such
a nonproject environmental impact statement and notice of the community
meeting required by this section must be mailed to all property owners
of record within the subarea to be studied, to all property owners
within one hundred fifty feet of the boundaries of such a subarea, to
all affected federally recognized tribal governments whose ceded area
is within one-half mile of the boundaries of the subarea, and to
agencies with jurisdiction over the future development anticipated
within the subarea.
(c) In cities with over five hundred thousand residents, notice of
scoping for such a nonproject environmental impact statement and notice
of the community meeting required by this section must be mailed to all
small businesses as defined in RCW 19.85.020, and to all community
preservation and development authorities established under chapter
43.167 RCW, located within the subarea to be studied or within one
hundred fifty feet of the boundaries of such subarea. The process for
community involvement must have the goal of fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development
and implementation of the subarea planning process.
(d) The notice of the community meeting must include general
illustrations and descriptions of buildings generally representative of
the maximum building envelope that will be allowed under the proposed
plan and indicate that future appeals of proposed developments that are
consistent with the plan will be limited. Notice of the community
meeting must include signs located on major travel routes in the
subarea. If the building envelope increases during the process,
another notice complying with the requirements of this section must be
issued before the next public involvement opportunity.
(e) Any person that has standing to appeal the adoption of this
subarea plan or the implementing regulations under RCW 36.70A.280 has
standing to bring an appeal of the nonproject environmental impact
statement required by this subsection.
(f) Cities with over five hundred thousand residents shall prepare
a study that accompanies or is appended to the nonproject environmental
impact statement, but must not be part of that statement, that analyzes
the extent to which the proposed subarea plan may result in the
displacement or fragmentation of existing businesses, existing
residents, including people living with poverty, families with
children, and intergenerational households, or cultural groups within
the proposed subarea plan. The city shall also discuss the results of
the analysis at the community meeting.
(g) As an incentive for development authorized under this section,
a city shall consider establishing a transfer of development rights
program in consultation with the county where the city is located, that
conserves county-designated agricultural and forest land of long-term
commercial significance. If the city decides not to establish a
transfer of development rights program, the city must state in the
record the reasons for not adopting the program. The city's decision
not to establish a transfer of development rights program is not
subject to appeal. Nothing in this subsection (4)(g) may be used as a
basis to challenge the optional comprehensive plan or subarea plan
policies authorized under this section.
(5)(a) Until July 1, 2018, a proposed development that is
consistent with the optional comprehensive plan or subarea plan
policies and development regulations adopted under subsection (1) or
(2) of this section and that is environmentally reviewed under
subsection (4) of this section may not be challenged in administrative
or judicial appeals for noncompliance with this chapter as long as a
complete application for such a development that vests the application
or would later lead to vested status under city or state law is
submitted to the city within a time frame established by the city, but
not to exceed ten years from the date of issuance of the final
environmental impact statement.
(b) After July 1, 2018, the immunity from appeals under this
chapter of any application that vests or will vest under this
subsection or the ability to vest under this subsection is still valid,
provided that the final subarea environmental impact statement is
issued by July 1, 2018. ((After July 1, 2018, a city may continue to
collect reimbursement fees under subsection (6) of this section for the
proportionate share of a subarea environmental impact statement issued
prior to July 1, 2018.))
(6) ((It is recognized that a city that prepares a nonproject
environmental impact statement under subsection (4) of this section
must endure a substantial financial burden. A city may recover its
reasonable expenses of preparation of a nonproject environmental impact
statement prepared under subsection (4) of this section through access
to financial assistance under RCW 36.70A.490 or funding from private
sources. In addition, a city is authorized to recover a portion of its
reasonable expenses of preparation of such a nonproject environmental
impact statement by the assessment of reasonable and proportionate fees
upon subsequent development that is consistent with the plan and
development regulations adopted under subsection (5) of this section,
as long as the development makes use of and benefits [from], as
described in subsection (5) of this section, from the nonproject
environmental impact statement prepared by the city. Any assessment
fees collected from subsequent development may be used to reimburse
funding received from private sources. In order to collect such fees,
the city must enact an ordinance that sets forth objective standards
for determining how the fees to be imposed upon each development will
be proportionate to the impacts of each development and to the benefits
accruing to each development from the nonproject environmental impact
statement. Any disagreement about the reasonableness or amount of the
fees imposed upon a development may not be the basis for delay in
issuance of a project permit for that development. The fee assessed by
the city may be paid with the written stipulation "paid under protest"
and if the city provides for an administrative appeal of its decision
on the project for which the fees are imposed, any dispute about the
amount of the fees must be resolved in the same administrative appeal
process.)) If a proposed development is inconsistent with the optional
comprehensive plan or subarea plan policies and development regulations
adopted under subsection (1) of this section, the city shall require
additional environmental review in accordance with this chapter.
(7)
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The utility-related actions listed in subsection (2) of this
section are categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter,
except for installation, construction, or alteration on lands covered
by water. The exemption includes installation and construction,
relocation when required by other governmental bodies, repair,
replacement, maintenance, operation, or alteration that does not change
the action from an exempt class.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (1) of this section, the
following are categorically exempt from the requirements of this
chapter:
(a) Installing electric facilities, lines, equipment, or
appurtenances, not including substations, with an associated voltage of
one hundred fifteen thousand volts or fewer;
(b) Building over existing distribution lines with transmission
lines of one hundred fifteen thousand volts or more; and
(c) Placing electric facilities, lines, equipment, or appurtenances
underground.
(3) The department of ecology may adopt additional categorical
exemptions for utility-related actions in accordance with RCW
43.21C.110.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C
RCW to read as follows:
(1)(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (1), the
proposed actions contained in subsections (2) and (3) of this section
are categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter if the
proposed action is located within a county, city, or town planning
under RCW 36.70A.040. If a proposed action is located in more than one
county, city, or town, the lower of the agencies' adopted categorical
exemption levels controls, regardless of which agency is the lead
agency.
(b) An ordinance or resolution may be adopted by a city, county, or
town to establish lower exemption levels for specific geographic areas
within the city, county, or town and remove the otherwise exempt
proposed actions identified in subsections (2) and (3) of this section
from being considered exempt.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (1)(b) of this section, the
following actions are categorically exempt from the requirements of
this chapter if the proposed action is located within an urban growth
area designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110:
(a) The following are nonproject actions:
(i) Amendments to development regulations that are required to
ensure consistency with an adopted comprehensive plan pursuant to RCW
36.70A.040, where the comprehensive plan was previously subjected to
environmental review pursuant to this chapter;
(ii) Amendments to development regulations that are required to
ensure consistency with a shoreline master program approved pursuant to
RCW 90.58.090, where the shoreline master program was previously
subjected to environmental review pursuant to this chapter;
(iii) Amendments to development regulations that, upon
implementation of a project action, will provide increased
environmental protection, limited to the following:
(A) Increased protections for critical areas, such as enhanced
buffers or setbacks;
(B) Increased vegetation retention or decreased impervious surface
areas in shoreline jurisdiction; and
(C) Increased vegetation retention or decreased impervious surface
areas in critical areas;
(iv) Amendments to technical codes adopted by a county, city, or
town to ensure consistency with minimum standards contained in state
law, including the following:
(A) Building codes required by chapter 19.27 RCW;
(B) Energy codes required by chapter 19.27A RCW; and
(C) Electrical codes required by chapter 19.28 RCW.
(b) The following are project actions:
(i) The construction or location of single-family residential
developments of fifty dwelling units or fewer;
(ii) The construction or location of multifamily residential
developments of eighty dwelling units or fewer;
(iii) The construction of an office, school, commercial,
recreational, service, or storage building with thirty thousand or
fewer square feet of gross floor area, and with associated parking
facilities designed for one hundred automobiles or fewer; and
(iv) Any landfill or excavation of one thousand two hundred cubic
yards or fewer of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the
fill or excavation.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (1)(b) of this section, the
following types of construction are categorically exempt from the
requirements of this chapter if the proposed action is located outside
an urban growth area designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110:
(a) The following are nonproject actions:
(i) Amendments to development regulations that are required to
ensure consistency with an adopted comprehensive plan pursuant to RCW
36.70A.040, where the comprehensive plan was previously subjected to
environmental review pursuant to this chapter;
(ii) Amendments to development regulations that are required to
ensure consistency with a shoreline master program approved pursuant to
RCW 90.58.090, where the shoreline master program was previously
subjected to environmental review pursuant to this chapter;
(iii) Amendments to development regulations that, upon
implementation of a project action, will provide increased
environmental protection, limited to the following:
(A) Increased protections for critical areas such as enhanced
buffers or setbacks;
(B) Increased vegetation retention or decreased impervious surface
areas in shoreline jurisdiction; and
(C) Increased vegetation retention or decreased impervious surface
areas in critical areas;
(iv) Amendments to technical codes adopted by a county, city, or
town to ensure consistency with minimum standards contained in state
law, including the following:
(A) Building codes required by chapter 19.27 RCW;
(B) Energy codes required by chapter 19.27A RCW; and
(C) Electrical codes required by chapter 19.28 RCW.
(b) The following are project actions:
(i) The construction or location of single-family residential
developments of twenty-five dwelling units or fewer;
(ii) Excluding feed lots, the construction of a barn, loafing shed,
farm equipment storage building, produce storage or packing structure,
or similar agricultural structure, covering up to fifty thousand square
feet, and to be used only by the property owner or the property owner's
agent in the conduct of farming the property;
(iii) The construction of an office, school, commercial,
recreational, service, or storage building with fifteen thousand or
fewer square feet of gross floor area, and with associated parking
facilities designed for fifty automobiles or fewer; and
(iv) Any landfill or excavation of one thousand cubic yards or
fewer of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the fill or
excavation.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12 A new section is added to chapter 43.21C
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The lead agency for an environmental review under this chapter
utilizing an environmental checklist developed by the department of
ecology pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110 may satisfy the requirements of the
checklist by identifying instances where questions on the checklist are
adequately covered by a locally adopted ordinance, development
regulation, land use plan, or other legal authority.
(2) In instances where the locally adopted ordinance, development
regulation, land use plan, or other legal authority provide the
necessary information to answer a specific question, the lead agency
must explain how the proposed project satisfies the underlying local
legal authority.
(3) Nothing in this section authorizes a lead agency to ignore or
delete a question on the checklist.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 13 (1) The department of ecology must, by
December 31, 2012, amend WAC 197-11-960, as it existed on the effective
date of this section, to allow for the flexibility in the environmental
checklist process provided in section 11 of this act.
(2) This section expires July 31, 2013.
Sec. 14 RCW 36.70A.490 and 1995 c 347 s 115 are each amended to
read as follows:
The growth management planning and environmental review fund is
hereby established in the state treasury. Moneys may be placed in the
fund from the proceeds of bond sales, tax revenues, budget transfers,
federal appropriations, gifts, or any other lawful source. Moneys in
the fund may be spent only after appropriation. Moneys in the fund
shall be used to make grants or loans to local governments for the
purposes set forth in RCW 43.21C.240, 43.21C.031, or 36.70A.500. Any
payment of either principal or interest, or both, derived from loans
made from this fund must be deposited into the fund.
Sec. 15 RCW 36.70A.500 and 1997 c 429 s 28 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The department of ((community, trade, and economic
development)) commerce shall provide management services for the growth
management planning and environmental review fund created by RCW
36.70A.490. The department shall establish procedures for fund
management. The department shall encourage participation in the grant
or loan program by other public agencies. The department shall develop
the grant or loan criteria, monitor the grant or loan program, and
select grant or loan recipients in consultation with state agencies
participating in the grant or loan program through the provision of
grant or loan funds or technical assistance.
(2) A grant or loan may be awarded to a county or city that is
required to or has chosen to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and that is
qualified pursuant to this section. The grant or loan shall be
provided to assist a county or city in paying for the cost of preparing
an environmental analysis under chapter 43.21C RCW, that is integrated
with a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, plan element, countywide
planning policy, development regulation, monitoring program, or other
planning activity adopted under or implementing this chapter that:
(a) Improves the process for project permit review while
maintaining environmental quality; or
(b) Encourages use of plans and information developed for purposes
of complying with this chapter to satisfy requirements of other state
programs.
(3) In order to qualify for a grant or loan, a county or city
shall:
(a) Demonstrate that it will prepare an environmental analysis
pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW and subsection (2) of this section that
is integrated with a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, plan element,
countywide planning policy, development regulations, monitoring
program, or other planning activity adopted under or implementing this
chapter;
(b) Address environmental impacts and consequences, alternatives,
and mitigation measures in sufficient detail to allow the analysis to
be adopted in whole or in part by applicants for development permits
within the geographic area analyzed in the plan;
(c) Demonstrate that procedures for review of development permit
applications will be based on the integrated plans and environmental
analysis;
(d) Include mechanisms to monitor the consequences of growth as it
occurs in the plan area and to use the resulting data to update the
plan, policy, or implementing mechanisms and associated environmental
analysis;
(e) Demonstrate substantial progress towards compliance with the
requirements of this chapter. A county or city that is more than six
months out of compliance with a requirement of this chapter is deemed
not to be making substantial progress towards compliance; and
(f) Provide local funding, which may include financial
participation by the private sector.
(4) In awarding grants or loans, the department shall give
preference to proposals that include one or more of the following
elements:
(a) Financial participation by the private sector, or a
public/private partnering approach;
(b) Identification and monitoring of system capacities for elements
of the built environment, and to the extent appropriate, of the natural
environment;
(c) Coordination with state, federal, and tribal governments in
project review;
(d) Furtherance of important state objectives related to economic
development, protection of areas of statewide significance, and siting
of essential public facilities;
(e) Programs to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the
permitting process by greater reliance on integrated plans and
prospective environmental analysis;
(f) Programs for effective citizen and neighborhood involvement
that contribute to greater likelihood that planning decisions can be
implemented with community support; ((and))
(g) Programs to identify environmental impacts and establish
mitigation measures that provide effective means to satisfy concurrency
requirements and establish project consistency with the plans; or
(h) Environmental review that addresses the impacts of increased
density or intensity of comprehensive plans, subarea plans, or
receiving areas designated by a city or town under the regional
transfer of development rights program in chapter 43.362 RCW.
(5) If the local funding includes funding provided by other state
functional planning programs, including open space planning and
watershed or basin planning, the functional plan shall be integrated
into and be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(6) State agencies shall work with grant or loan recipients to
facilitate state and local project review processes that will implement
the projects receiving grants or loans under this section.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 16 A new section is added to chapter 82.02 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The legislature finds that:
(a) Detailed environmental analysis integrated with comprehensive
plans, subarea plans, and development regulations will facilitate
planning for and managing growth, allow greater protection of the
environment, and benefit both the general public and private property
owners;
(b) Compact development in urban growth areas, or transfer of
development rights programs, will assist in the conservation of rural,
agricultural, and forest land by redirecting growth from this land to
areas designated for compact development or receiving areas in cities
and towns where growth should occur;
(c) Cities and towns planning for increased growth in receiving
areas under chapter 43.362 RCW must comply with chapter 43.21C RCW;
(d) Planning for compact or increased growth in urban growth areas,
or receiving areas under chapter 43.362 RCW in compliance with chapter
43.21C RCW, presents a financial burden on cities and towns;
(e) Planning for compact or increased growth in urban growth areas,
or receiving areas under chapter 43.362 RCW in compliance with chapter
43.21C RCW, should be encouraged to ensure that the quality of life in
receiving neighborhoods and the protection of environmental values over
time are maintained by providing financial assistance through the
growth management planning and environmental review fund created in RCW
36.70A.490;
(f) Access to financial assistance through the growth management
planning and environmental review fund created in RCW 36.70A.490 may be
increased by allowing the fund to become a revolving loan program
rather than only a grant program; and
(g) Counties, cities, and towns will have the ability to repay
loans from the growth management planning and environmental review fund
created in RCW 36.70A.490, or recoup their own costs associated with
environmental review conducted at a comprehensive plan or subarea plan
level, with fees they collect from developers who will benefit from the
environmental review that the city or county has already conducted
under chapter 43.21C RCW on a comprehensive plan or subarea plan, or in
conjunction with the designation of a receiving area under chapter
43.362 RCW, and that addresses the impacts of compact development or
projects using transferable development rights.
(2) Counties, cities, and towns that conduct detailed environmental
review under chapter 43.21C RCW, integrated with a comprehensive plan
or subarea plan within urban growth areas, are authorized to impose
environmental fees on development activity as part of the financing for
environmental review conducted under chapter 43.21C RCW on a
comprehensive plan or subarea plan.
(3) The environmental fees:
(a) May only be imposed for environmental review costs that have
been identified as reasonably related to the new development;
(b) May not exceed the proportionate share of the costs of
environmental review conducted for a comprehensive plan or subarea
plan; and
(c) May, if applicable, be used to repay a loan from the growth
management planning and environmental review fund created in RCW
36.70A.490.
Sec. 17 RCW 82.02.020 and 2010 c 153 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
Except only as expressly provided in chapters 67.28, 81.104, and
82.14 RCW, the state preempts the field of imposing retail sales and
use taxes and taxes upon parimutuel wagering authorized pursuant to RCW
67.16.060, conveyances, and cigarettes, and no county, town, or other
municipal subdivision shall have the right to impose taxes of that
nature. Except as provided in RCW 64.34.440, section 16 of this act,
and RCW 82.02.050 through 82.02.090, no county, city, town, or other
municipal corporation shall impose any tax, fee, or charge, either
direct or indirect, on the construction or reconstruction of
residential buildings, commercial buildings, industrial buildings, or
on any other building or building space or appurtenance thereto, or on
the development, subdivision, classification, or reclassification of
land. However, this section does not preclude dedications of land or
easements within the proposed development or plat which the county,
city, town, or other municipal corporation can demonstrate are
reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or
plat to which the dedication of land or easement is to apply.
This section does not prohibit voluntary agreements with counties,
cities, towns, or other municipal corporations that allow a payment in
lieu of a dedication of land or to mitigate a direct impact that has
been identified as a consequence of a proposed development,
subdivision, or plat. A local government shall not use such voluntary
agreements for local off-site transportation improvements within the
geographic boundaries of the area or areas covered by an adopted
transportation program authorized by chapter 39.92 RCW. Any such
voluntary agreement is subject to the following provisions:
(1) The payment shall be held in a reserve account and may only be
expended to fund a capital improvement agreed upon by the parties to
mitigate the identified, direct impact;
(2) The payment shall be expended in all cases within five years of
collection; and
(3) Any payment not so expended shall be refunded with interest to
be calculated from the original date the deposit was received by the
county and at the same rate applied to tax refunds pursuant to RCW
84.69.100; however, if the payment is not expended within five years
due to delay attributable to the developer, the payment shall be
refunded without interest.
No county, city, town, or other municipal corporation shall require
any payment as part of such a voluntary agreement which the county,
city, town, or other municipal corporation cannot establish is
reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or
plat.
Nothing in this section prohibits cities, towns, counties, or other
municipal corporations from collecting reasonable fees from an
applicant for a permit or other governmental approval to cover the cost
to the city, town, county, or other municipal corporation of processing
applications, inspecting and reviewing plans, or preparing detailed
statements required by chapter 43.21C RCW, including reasonable fees
that are consistent with ((RCW 43.21C.420(6))) section 8 of this act.
This section does not limit the existing authority of any county,
city, town, or other municipal corporation to impose special
assessments on property specifically benefited thereby in the manner
prescribed by law.
Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from
imposing or permits counties, cities, or towns to impose water, sewer,
natural gas, drainage utility, and drainage system charges. However,
no such charge shall exceed the proportionate share of such utility or
system's capital costs which the county, city, or town can demonstrate
are attributable to the property being charged. Furthermore, these
provisions may not be interpreted to expand or contract any existing
authority of counties, cities, or towns to impose such charges.
Nothing in this section prohibits a transportation benefit district
from imposing fees or charges authorized in RCW 36.73.120 nor prohibits
the legislative authority of a county, city, or town from approving the
imposition of such fees within a transportation benefit district.
Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from
imposing transportation impact fees authorized pursuant to chapter
39.92 RCW.
Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from
requiring property owners to provide relocation assistance to tenants
under RCW 59.18.440 and 59.18.450.
Nothing in this section limits the authority of counties, cities,
or towns to implement programs consistent with RCW 36.70A.540, nor to
enforce agreements made pursuant to such programs.
This section does not apply to special purpose districts formed and
acting pursuant to Title 54, 57, or 87 RCW, nor is the authority
conferred by these titles affected.
Sec. 18 RCW 43.21C.110 and 1997 c 429 s 47 are each amended to
read as follows:
Except as otherwise provided in section 1 of this act, it shall be
the duty and function of the department of ecology:
(1) To adopt and amend ((thereafter)) rules of interpretation and
implementation of this chapter, subject to the requirements of chapter
34.05 RCW, for the purpose of providing uniform rules and guidelines to
all branches of government including state agencies, political
subdivisions, public and municipal corporations, and counties. The
proposed rules shall be subject to full public hearings requirements
associated with rule ((promulgation)) adoption. Suggestions for
modifications of the proposed rules shall be considered on their
merits, and the department shall have the authority and responsibility
for full and appropriate independent ((promulgation and)) adoption of
rules, assuring consistency with this chapter as amended and with the
preservation of protections afforded by this chapter. The rule-making
powers authorized in this section shall include, but shall not be
limited to, the following phases of interpretation and implementation
of this chapter:
(a) ((Categories of governmental actions which are not to be
considered as potential major actions significantly affecting the
quality of the environment, including categories pertaining to
applications for water right permits pursuant to chapters 90.03 and
90.44 RCW. The types of actions included as categorical exemptions in
the rules shall be limited to those types which are not major actions
significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The rules
shall provide for certain circumstances where actions which potentially
are categorically exempt require environmental review. An action that
is categorically exempt under the rules adopted by the department may
not be conditioned or denied under this chapter.)) Rules for criteria and procedures applicable to the
determination of when an act of a branch of government is a major
action significantly affecting the quality of the environment for which
a detailed statement is required to be prepared pursuant to RCW
43.21C.030.
(b)
(((c))) (b) Rules and procedures applicable to the preparation of
detailed statements and other environmental documents, including but
not limited to rules for timing of environmental review, obtaining
comments, data and other information, and providing for and determining
areas of public participation which shall include the scope and review
of draft environmental impact statements.
(((d))) (c) Scope of coverage and contents of detailed statements
assuring that such statements are simple, uniform, and as short as
practicable; statements are required to analyze only reasonable
alternatives and probable adverse environmental impacts which are
significant, and may analyze beneficial impacts.
(((e))) (d) Rules and procedures for public notification of actions
taken and documents prepared.
(((f))) (e) Definition of terms relevant to the implementation of
this chapter including the establishment of a list of elements of the
environment. Analysis of environmental considerations under RCW
43.21C.030(2) may be required only for those subjects listed as
elements of the environment (or portions thereof). The list of
elements of the environment shall consist of the "natural" and "built"
environment. The elements of the built environment shall consist of
public services and utilities (such as water, sewer, schools, fire and
police protection), transportation, environmental health (such as
explosive materials and toxic waste), and land and shoreline use
(including housing, and a description of the relationships with land
use and shoreline plans and designations, including population).
(((g))) (f) Rules for determining the obligations and powers under
this chapter of two or more branches of government involved in the same
project significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
(((h))) (g) Methods to assure adequate public awareness of the
preparation and issuance of detailed statements required by RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c).
(((i))) (h) To prepare rules for projects setting forth the time
limits within which the governmental entity responsible for the action
shall comply with the provisions of this chapter.
(((j))) (i) Rules for utilization of a detailed statement for more
than one action and rules improving environmental analysis of
nonproject proposals and encouraging better interagency coordination
and integration between this chapter and other environmental laws.
(((k))) (j) Rules relating to actions which shall be exempt from
the provisions of this chapter in situations of emergency.
(((l))) (k) Rules relating to the use of environmental documents in
planning and decision making and the implementation of the substantive
policies and requirements of this chapter, including procedures for
appeals under this chapter.
(((m))) (l) Rules and procedures that provide for the integration
of environmental review with project review as provided in RCW
43.21C.240. The rules and procedures shall be jointly developed with
the department of ((community, trade, and economic development))
commerce and shall be applicable to the preparation of environmental
documents for actions in counties, cities, and towns planning under RCW
36.70A.040. The rules and procedures shall also include procedures and
criteria to analyze planned actions under ((RCW 43.21C.031(2))) section
5 of this act and revisions to the rules adopted under this section to
ensure that they are compatible with the requirements and
authorizations of chapter 347, Laws of 1995, as amended by chapter 429,
Laws of 1997. Ordinances or procedures adopted by a county, city, or
town to implement the provisions of chapter 347, Laws of 1995 prior to
the effective date of rules adopted under this subsection (1)(((m)))
(l) shall continue to be effective until the adoption of any new or
revised ordinances or procedures that may be required. If any
revisions are required as a result of rules adopted under this
subsection (1)(((m))) (l), those revisions shall be made within the
time limits specified in RCW 43.21C.120.
(2) In exercising its powers, functions, and duties under this
section, the department may:
(a) Consult with the state agencies and with representatives of
science, industry, agriculture, labor, conservation organizations,
state and local governments, and other groups, as it deems advisable;
and
(b) Utilize, to the fullest extent possible, the services,
facilities, and information (including statistical information) of
public and private agencies, organizations, and individuals, in order
to avoid duplication of effort and expense, overlap, or conflict with
similar activities authorized by law and performed by established
agencies.
(3) Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall be subject to the
review procedures of chapter 34.05 RCW.
Sec. 19 RCW 43.21C.095 and 1983 c 117 s 5 are each amended to
read as follows:
The rules ((promulgated)) adopted under RCW 43.21C.110 and section
1 of this act shall be accorded substantial deference in the
interpretation of this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 20 A new section is added to chapter 36.70B
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The legislature recognizes the value of integrating the
environmental notice and review process under chapter 43.21C RCW with
development project notice and review under this chapter, and intends
this section to improve the local permit review process and facilitate
complete and well-informed decision making.
(2) If an open record predecision hearing is required for the
requested project permits, notice must be provided at least fifteen
days prior to the open record hearing.
(3) The notice of application must include the following elements
in whatever sequence or format the local government deems appropriate:
(a) The date of application and the date of the notice;
(b) If the application is complete, the completeness date;
(c) A description of the proposed project action and a list of the
project permits and reviews included in the application and, if
applicable, a list of any studies or other information submitted with
the application;
(d) The identification of other permits required but not included
in the application, to the extent known by the local government;
(e) The location where the application and related information can
be reviewed;
(f) A statement of the opportunity for public comment including:
(i) Identification of the comment period, which shall be at least
fourteen but not more than thirty days following the date of notice;
and
(ii) Statements of the right of any person to comment on the
application, receive notice of and participate in any hearings, request
a copy of the decision once made, and any appeal rights;
(g) If a meeting or hearing was scheduled at the time of notice of
the application, the date, time, place, and type of meeting or hearing;
(h) If a preliminary determination has been made at the time of
notice, a statement of:
(i) Those development regulations that will be used for project
mitigation;
(ii) Regulations of other agencies that will be relied upon for
project mitigation; and
(iii) A description of impacts that may be addressed under the
authority of chapter 43.21C RCW; and
(i) Any other information deemed appropriate by the local
government.
(4) The provisions of this section do not preclude a local
government from requesting additional information from the applicant as
a result of project review.
(5) A local government may accept public comments at any time prior
to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if
any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to
the decision on the project permit.
(6) No local government may make a final decision during the public
comment period.
(7) A local government shall provide notice to the public and to
agencies with jurisdiction. A local government may use its existing
notice procedures and may provide different types of notice for
different categories of project permits or types of project actions.
At minimum, a local government shall use the following methods to
provide a summary description of the proposal and identify means to
access the full notice and complete application for review:
(a) Posting the affected property for site-specific proposals; and
(b) Publishing a summary notice in the newspaper of general
circulation in the general area where the proposal is located or in a
local land use bulletin published by the local government.
(8)(a) A local government shall also provide notice to the
following parties:
(i) Affected agencies;
(ii) Affected tribes;
(iii) Public or private groups with a known interest in a
certain proposal or in the type of proposal being considered; and
(iv) Neighboring property owners when required by local ordinance.
(b) Notice to the parties in (a) of this subsection must be
provided by one of the following methods:
(i) Electronic mail notice;
(ii) Mailed paper notice, when electronic addresses are not
available; or
(iii) Other methods established by local ordinances.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 21 A new section is added to chapter 36.70B
RCW to read as follows:
A local government shall integrate the permit procedures in section
20 of this act with environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW as
follows:
(1) A single integrated comment period must be used to obtain
comments on the proposal and the expected threshold determination for
the proposal.
(2) Except in cases where a determination of significance is
issued, the local government may not issue its threshold determination
until the expiration of the public comment period.
(3) If a local government has made a determination of significance,
the scoping notice may be issued prior to the notice of application.
(4) If an open record predecision hearing is required, the local
government shall issue its threshold determination and any required
recommendation at least fifteen days prior to the open record
predecision hearing. A staff report must identify all mitigation
required or proposed under development regulations, and mitigation
required or proposed under the agency's authority under RCW 43.21C.060.
(5) If an open record predecision hearing is not required, the
local government shall issue the threshold determination in conjunction
with any related land use decisions.
(6) If no discretionary land use decisions are required, such as
when decisions such as a building permit are the trigger for review
under chapter 43.21C RCW, the local government may issue a use
approval, which is considered an underlying action for purposes of any
allowed appeal of the threshold determination.
(7) In cases where the local government is exercising the
substantive authority of chapter 43.21C RCW to impose conditions or
mitigate environmental impacts of the proposed project, those
conditions must be explicitly identified in writing and made available
with the notice of decision.
(8) The responsible official may determine that an additional
fourteen day comment period is necessary when information received
during the comment period in subsection (1) of this section has
resulted in substantial changes to the project or the conditions of
approval.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 22 A new section is added to chapter 36.70B
RCW to read as follows:
(1) A local government may decide whether to provide administrative
appeals for decisions made pursuant to its development and
environmental review codes.
(2) When an administrative appeal is provided, unless otherwise set
forth or limited in local ordinance, the applicant for a project permit
and any party who provided comment on a project permit application
prior to the date a decision is issued has standing to file an
administrative appeal.
(3) Appeal of the project decision or use approval, and of any
environmental determination issued at the same time as the project
decision or use approval, must be commenced within the time periods as
set forth in subsection (5) of this section.
(4)(a) Where an open record predecision hearing is provided prior
to the decision on a project permit, and where the threshold
determination has been made as required in section 21 of this act, the
open record predecision hearing officer shall make a final procedural
decision on any appeal of the threshold determination.
(b) If an appeal of the project decision from the hearing officer
is allowed, a single closed record appeal must be provided before one
decision-making body or officer.
(c) The appropriate use or lack of use of substantive authority
under chapter 43.21C RCW may be considered during the closed record
appeal.
(5) An administrative appeal of the project decision and of any
environmental determination issued at the same time as the project
decision must be filed within fourteen days after the notice of the
decision or after other notice that the decision has been made and is
appealable, except when a thirty day notice is required pursuant to
chapter 90.58 RCW.
(6) If the responsible official has provided for an additional
fourteen day comment period under section 21(8) of this act, an
administrative appeal must be filed within fourteen days after the
conclusion of that comment period.
(7) If the applicant is the only party with standing to file an
administrative appeal, the applicant may waive the right of appeal in
writing. The appeal period must be curtailed and the project review
process must be concluded.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 23 A new section is added to chapter 36.70B
RCW to read as follows:
The provisions of this chapter are applicable to all counties and
cities.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 24 A new section is added to chapter 36.70 RCW
to read as follows:
The integrated environmental notice and review processes for
project review under chapter 36.70B RCW are applicable to all counties
and cities.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 25 RCW 36.70B.110 (Notice of application--Required elements -- Integration with other review procedures--
Administrative appeals) and 1997 c 429 s 48, 1997 c 396 s 1, & 1995 c
347 s 415 are each repealed.