Passed by the Senate April 21, 2011 YEAS 46   ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House April 7, 2011 YEAS 92   ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Thomas Hoemann, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SENATE BILL 5628 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 62nd Legislature | 2011 Regular Session |
Read first time 02/02/11. Referred to Committee on Ways & Means.
AN ACT Relating to a limited property tax exemption from the emergency medical services levy; amending RCW 84.52.069; and creating new sections.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 (1) The legislature finds that King county
currently imposes an emergency medical services levy throughout the
entire county. The legislature further finds that the city of Milton
is located partially within King and Pierce counties and the residents
of Milton within King county pay the county emergency medical services
levy. The legislature further finds that King county, through an
interlocal agreement with the city of Milton, has not provided
emergency medical services to the city for many years and instead has
remitted the county emergency medical services levy collected within
the city back to the city. The legislature further finds that the city
of Milton has collected only twenty cents per thousand dollars of
assessed valuation under its city emergency medical services levy, and
not the full fifty cents authorized by the city's voters, because state
law limits the city's levy, as well as any other taxing district's
emergency medical services levy, if the county also imposes the tax.
The legislature further finds that the city of Milton is exploring the
possibility of being annexed by a fire protection district located in
Pierce county; however, if the district annexes the entire city,
including the portion in King county, the district would have to lower
its emergency medical services levy as required under state law.
(2) It is the intent of the legislature to address this unusual
situation by excluding the portion of the city of Milton within King
county from the county emergency medical services levy. It is the
further intent of the legislature to clarify that a fire protection
district is able to levy the full amount of emergency medical services
levy otherwise allowed by law throughout the entire city.
Sec. 2 RCW 84.52.069 and 2004 c 129 s 23 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) As used in this section, "taxing district" means a county,
emergency medical service district, city or town, public hospital
district, urban emergency medical service district, regional fire
protection service authority, or fire protection district.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (10) of this section, a taxing
district may impose additional regular property tax levies in an amount
equal to fifty cents or less per thousand dollars of the assessed value
of property in the taxing district. The tax shall be imposed (a) each
year for six consecutive years, (b) each year for ten consecutive
years, or (c) permanently. A tax levy under this section must be
specifically authorized by a majority of at least three-fifths of the
registered voters thereof approving a proposition authorizing the
levies submitted at a general or special election, at which election
the number of persons voting "yes" on the proposition shall constitute
three-fifths of a number equal to forty percent of the total number of
voters voting in such taxing district at the last preceding general
election when the number of registered voters voting on the proposition
does not exceed forty percent of the total number of voters voting in
such taxing district in the last preceding general election; or by a
majority of at least three-fifths of the registered voters thereof
voting on the proposition when the number of registered voters voting
on the proposition exceeds forty percent of the total number of voters
voting in such taxing district in the last preceding general election.
Ballot propositions ((shall)) must conform with RCW 29A.36.210. A
taxing district ((shall)) may not submit to the voters at the same
election multiple propositions to impose a levy under this section.
(3) A taxing district imposing a permanent levy under this section
shall provide for separate accounting of expenditures of the revenues
generated by the levy. The taxing district ((shall)) must maintain a
statement of the accounting which ((shall)) must be updated at least
every two years and ((shall)) must be available to the public upon
request at no charge.
(4)(a) A taxing district imposing a permanent levy under this
section ((shall)) must provide for a referendum procedure to apply to
the ordinance or resolution imposing the tax. This referendum
procedure ((shall)) must specify that a referendum petition may be
filed at any time with a filing officer, as identified in the ordinance
or resolution. Within ten days, the filing officer ((shall)) must
confer with the petitioner concerning form and style of the petition,
issue the petition an identification number, and secure an accurate,
concise, and positive ballot title from the designated local official.
The petitioner ((shall have)) has thirty days in which to secure the
signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of
the taxing district, as of the last general election, upon petition
forms which contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure
to be referred. The filing officer ((shall)) must verify the
sufficiency of the signatures on the petition and, if sufficient valid
signatures are properly submitted, ((shall)) must certify the
referendum measure to the next election within the taxing district if
one is to be held within one hundred eighty days from the date of
filing of the referendum petition, or at a special election to be
called for that purpose in accordance with RCW 29A.04.330.
(b) The referendum procedure provided in this subsection ((shall
be)) (4) is exclusive in all instances for any taxing district imposing
the tax under this section and ((shall)) supersedes the procedures
provided under all other statutory or charter provisions for initiative
or referendum which might otherwise apply.
(5) Any tax imposed under this section ((shall)) may be used only
for the provision of emergency medical care or emergency medical
services, including related personnel costs, training for such
personnel, and related equipment, supplies, vehicles and structures
needed for the provision of emergency medical care or emergency medical
services.
(6) If a county levies a tax under this section, no taxing district
within the county may levy a tax under this section. If a regional
fire protection service authority imposes a tax under this section, no
other taxing district that is a participating fire protection
jurisdiction in the regional fire protection service authority may levy
a tax under this section. No other taxing district may levy a tax
under this section if another taxing district has levied a tax under
this section within its boundaries: PROVIDED, That if a county levies
less than fifty cents per thousand dollars of the assessed value of
property, then any other taxing district may levy a tax under this
section equal to the difference between the rate of the levy by the
county and fifty cents: PROVIDED FURTHER, That if a taxing district
within a county levies this tax, and the voters of the county
subsequently approve a levying of this tax, then the amount of the
taxing district levy within the county ((shall)) must be reduced, when
the combined levies exceed fifty cents. Whenever a tax is levied
countywide, the service ((shall)) must, insofar as is feasible, be
provided throughout the county: PROVIDED FURTHER, That no countywide
levy proposal may be placed on the ballot without the approval of the
legislative authority of each city exceeding fifty thousand population
within the county: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That this section and RCW
36.32.480 shall not prohibit any city or town from levying an annual
excess levy to fund emergency medical services: AND PROVIDED, FURTHER,
That if a county proposes to impose tax levies under this section, no
other ballot proposition authorizing tax levies under this section by
another taxing district in the county may be placed before the voters
at the same election at which the county ballot proposition is placed:
AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That any taxing district emergency medical
service levy that is limited in duration and that is authorized
subsequent to a county emergency medical service levy that is limited
in duration, ((shall)) expires concurrently with the county emergency
medical service levy. A fire protection district that has annexed an
area described in subsection (10) of this section may levy the maximum
amount of tax that would otherwise be allowed, notwithstanding any
limitations in this subsection (6).
(7) The limitations in RCW 84.52.043 ((shall)) do not apply to the
tax levy authorized in this section.
(8) If a ballot proposition approved under subsection (2) of this
section did not impose the maximum allowable levy amount authorized for
the taxing district under this section, any future increase up to the
maximum allowable levy amount must be specifically authorized by the
voters in accordance with subsection (2) of this section at a general
or special election.
(9) The limitation in RCW 84.55.010 ((shall)) does not apply to the
first levy imposed pursuant to this section following the approval of
such levy by the voters pursuant to subsection (2) of this section.
(10) For purposes of imposing the tax authorized under this
section, the boundary of a county with a population greater than one
million five hundred thousand does not include all of the area of the
county that is located within a city that has a boundary in two
counties, if the locally assessed value of all the property in the area
of the city within the county having a population greater than one
million five hundred thousand is less than two hundred fifty million
dollars.
(11) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(a) "Fire protection jurisdiction" means a fire protection
district, city, town, Indian tribe, or port district; and
(b) "Participating fire protection jurisdiction" means a fire
protection district, city, town, Indian tribe, or port district that is
represented on the governing board of a regional fire protection
service authority.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 This act applies to taxes levied for
collection in 2012 and thereafter.