FINAL BILL REPORT

HB 1194

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

C 194 L 13

Synopsis as Enacted

Brief Description: Limiting liability for habitat projects.

Sponsors: Representatives Stanford, Warnick, Lytton, Goodman, Wilcox, Tharinger, Chandler, Blake, Nealey, Orcutt, Hansen, Kirby, Ryu, Fagan and McCoy.

House Committee on Judiciary

Senate Committee on Law & Justice

Background:

The Governor's Salmon Recovery Office, located within the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), is responsible for coordinating the state strategy to allow for salmon recovery to healthy, sustainable population levels. Part of that responsibility is to coordinate and assist in the development, implementation, and revision of regional salmon recovery plans as part of the statewide strategy for salmon recovery. The Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB), consisting of five voting Governor appointees and five state officials serving as ex officio nonvoting members, determines which projects receive funding.

Washington's system of watersheds is divided into eight Salmon Recovery Regions: Hood Canal, Lower Columbia River, Middle Columbia River, Northeast Washington, Puget Sound, Snake River, Southwest Washington, Upper Columbia River, and Washington Coast.

Within those eight regions, the counties, cities, and tribal governments jointly designate areas for which a "habitat project list" is to be developed, and designate the lead entity. The lead entity may be a county, city, conservation district, special district, tribal government, regional recovery organization, or other entity. Once selected, a lead entity must establish a committee to provide citizen-based evaluation of the projects proposed for the habitat project list.

Projects eligible for the list include restoration projects, protection projects, projects that improve water quality, projects that protect water quality, habitat-related mitigation projects, and project maintenance and monitoring activities. No project included on a habitat project list is mandatory, however, and no private landowner may be forced to participate in any project. All areas covered by a project must be based on a water resource inventory area (WRIA), a combination of WRIAs, or be an area agreed to by the counties, cities, and tribes.

Together, the lead entity and the committee evaluate the suggested projects, prioritize them, define the sequence for project implementation, and submit the habitat project list to the SRFB. Of the 139 projects submitted by lead entities in 2012, the SRFB fully or partially funded 116 of them.

Summary:

A landowner whose land is used for a habitat project that is included on a habitat project list may not be held civilly liable for property damage resulting from the habitat project regardless of whether the project was funded by the Salmon Recovery Funding Board, if the landowner has received notice from the project sponsor that the following conditions have been met:

Votes on Final Passage:

House

75

22

Senate

48

0

(Senate amended)

House

77

18

(House concurred)

Effective:

July 28, 2013