Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Local Government Committee

HB 1224

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Providing a process for county legislative authorities to withdraw from voluntary planning under the growth management act.

Sponsors: Representatives Kretz, Takko and Short.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Allows a county that elected to fully plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA), to remove itself and its cities from the obligation to fully plan under the GMA if the county has 20,000 or fewer inhabitants and other requirements are satisfied.

  • Expires the removal authority on December 31, 2014.

  • Bars a county that has adopted a removal resolution from re-electing to plan under the GMA for at least 10 years from the date of adoption of the removal resolution.

  • Requires a county that has adopted a removal resolution to adopt development regulations to assure the conservation of designated agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands.

Hearing Date: 2/8/13

Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).

Background:

The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for county and city governments in Washington. Enacted in 1990 and 1991, the GMA establishes numerous requirements for local governments obligated by mandate or choice to fully plan under the GMA and a reduced number of directives for all other counties and cities.

A county obligated by mandate to fully plan under the GMA is one that either:

A county obligated by choice to fully plan under the GMA is one that, not meeting the population requirements described above, has adopted a resolution subjecting itself, and cities located in the county, to the full requirements of the GMA (resolution of intention). Once a resolution of intention is adopted, the county and its cities become subject to all GMA planning requirements. The following is a list of counties that adopted resolutions of intention and the year in which the resolution was adopted: Benton (1990), Columbia (1991), Douglas (1990), Ferry (1990), Franklin (1990), Garfield (1991), Kittitas (1990), Pacific (1990), Pend Oreille (1990), Stevens (1993), and Walla Walla (1990).

According to the 2010 Census and April 1, 2012 population estimates of the Office of Financial Management (OFM) that are used for the allocation of selected state revenues, the following counties that adopted resolutions of intention have had populations of 20,000 or fewer residents between April 1, 2010 and April 1, 2012

County

Census (April 1)

2010 Population

April 1, 2012

OFM Estimate

Columbia

4,078

4,100

Ferry

7,551

7,650

Garfield

2,266

2,250

Pend Oreille

13,001

13,100

In addition to complying with the more broadly applicable requirements of the GMA, a county obligated by choice to fully plan under the GMA must:

Summary of Bill:

Until December 31, 2014, the legislative authority of a county that is obligated by choice to fully plan under the GMA may adopt a resolution removing the county, and the cities located within its boundaries, from the requirements to fully plan if:

Once an eligible county adopts a removal resolution, the county is barred for at least 10 years from adopting another resolution to fully plan under the GMA. Additionally, while the county and its cities are no longer bound to fully plan under the GMA, they are required, within one year of the adoption of the removal resolution, to adopt development regulations to assure the conservation of designated agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Requested on February 6, 2013.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.