Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Education Committee

2SHB 1424

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Enhancing the statewide K-12 dropout prevention, intervention, and reengagement system.

Sponsors: House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Haigh, Santos, Sullivan, Maxwell, Ryu, Freeman, Stonier, Seaquist, McCoy, Fey, Roberts, Morrell, Kagi, Bergquist and Jinkins).

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Modifies and clarifies descriptions and definitions of a K-12 dropout prevention, intervention, and reengagement system (System).

  • Directs the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop a System assessment tool for use by local partnerships of schools, families, and communities and continue development of a dropout prevention early warning and intervention system.

  • Creates a program to allocate funds for graduation coaches for struggling high schools, and school success coaches for associated elementary and middle schools, if funds are appropriated.

  • Allocates funding for students in approved dropout reengagement programs at a rate of 1.22 per full-time equivalent student.

  • Adds dropout prevention, intervention, and reengagement services to the basic core services to be provided by Educational Service Districts (ESDs) and creates an intervention specialist corps at ESDs if funds are appropriated.

Hearing Date: 1/16/14

Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).

Background:

Building Bridges.

Legislation enacted in 2007 established a Building Bridges Program (Building Bridges) to award grants to local partnerships of schools, families, and community-based organizations to develop dropout prevention and intervention systems based on community needs and resources.

A state-level workgroup was established with representatives of multiple state and local agencies and organizations, to advise the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) about the Building Bridges, and to coordinate services associated with dropout prevention. Subsequent legislation directed the workgroup to conduct several studies and make reports to the Legislature, which have been completed. The OSPI has recently renamed the workgroup as Graduation: A Team Effort (GATE).

Dropout Reengagement.

Legislation enacted in 2010 directed the OSPI to adopt rules and develop a model contract for school districts to use with community-based organizations, community or technical colleges, or Educational Service Districts (ESD) to provide dropout reengagement services for students aged 16 to 21 who have dropped out of school or are so credit deficient that completion of high school before age 21 is not an expected outcome.

A dropout reengagement program must provide academic instruction, college and work readiness preparation, case management, and resource and referral services. The OSPI rules require dropout reengagement programs to be approved before beginning operation. School districts are not required to enter a contract and may also operate their own programs. Enrolled students are funded through the regular state funding formulas. As of January 2014, there are 36 approved programs enrolling approximately 1,650 full-time equivalent students.

Other Dropout Prevention Programs.

The Pay for Actual Student Success (PASS) Program was established in 2011 to provide awards to high schools based on improvement in their graduation rates. The PASS Program also provides for funding to be allocated to three other dropout prevention programs in addition to the Building Bridges: Jobs for America's Graduates, the Opportunity Internship Program, and community mentoring and leadership development offered through the College Success Foundation.

A graduation coach is defined as a staff person, working in consultation with counselors, who is assigned to identify and provide intervention services to students who have dropped out or are at risk of dropping out of school or of not graduating on time. In 2012 the OSPI convened a workgroup to develop a policy and guidelines for graduation coaches.

Educational Service Districts.

Core funding for the nine ESDs is provided based on specified basic core services that include administration, cooperative administrative and curriculum services for school districts, personnel services such as educator certification, learning resource services, professional development, and other special district needs. Other ESD activities are supported through special appropriations, contracts with school districts, and fee for service.

Summary of Bill:

Building Bridges.

The purpose of the Building Bridges is to award grants to local partnerships to design and implement a K-12 dropout prevention, intervention, and reengagement system (System). It is clarified that the Building Bridges is a grant program, not a System.

The statutory definition of a System is made consistent by removing duplicative language. Prevention activities within a System are expanded to include tiered intervention, social-emotional and behavioral skills development, and opportunities for students to develop relationships with caring adults. Wraparound services are defined as a team-based approach to delivering services using an array of community and regional resources to address academic, social, emotional, health, and economic issues. Designing and providing wraparound services for vulnerable students is included as one of the functions of a System.

The definition of a graduation coach is changed to be an individual (rather than a staff person) who conducts certain activities and works in consultation with counselors and other staff as provided in a model policy developed by the OSPI in 2012.

If funds are appropriated, the OSPI must develop a System assessment tool to support local partnerships in identifying community strengths and gaps in services, and evaluating the effectiveness of existing strategies to prevent and reengage dropouts. The OSPI must also continue development of a dropout prevention early warning and intervention system within available funds.

The state-level workgroup overseeing the Building Bridges is renamed the GATE, and assigned to establish a common vision and agenda for helping all students reach graduation. The GATE is further tasked with aligning the objectives and operation of various dropout prevention programs in support of a statewide System. The OSPI must submit a biennial report to the Legislature that includes activities undertaken and measurable indicators of progress toward achieving a System.

References to studies that have been completed are removed.

Dropout Reengagement.

The prototypical school funding formula is changed to allocate funding for students enrolled in an OSPI-approved dropout reengagement program at 1.22 times the statewide average allocation for a high school student. The ESDs that operate dropout reengagement programs under the model contract with school districts may award high school credit and issue transcripts to students.

Other Dropout Prevention Programs.

Subject to funding, the OSPI must establish a program to provide graduation coaches to high schools struggling to improve their graduation rates, and school success coaches to selected elementary and middle schools whose students attend those high schools. The OSPI must rank order all high schools based on a combination of factors, with a significant priority on graduation rates as a ranking factor. Each year the OSPI allocates funds, starting with the lowest-ranking schools, to support one graduation coach per 500 students in grades nine through 12, and one school success coach per 500 students in grades K through eight in selected elementary and middle schools.

The funds must be used to assign individuals to conduct the activities of a graduation coach or school success coach in the schools that generated the funds. Schools may also create partnerships with community-based organizations to assign individuals from the community to be coaches. Schools are eligible to continue receiving funds for three years, or until they no longer qualify based on their ranking, whichever is longer.

A school success coach is defined as an individual, working in consultation with counselors and other school staff, who is assigned to identify and provide early intervention services targeted toward elementary and middle school students to facilitate their continued enrollment, engagement, and progress in school.

Educational Service Districts.

The following responsibilities are added to basic core services to be provided by the ESDs and included in ESD budgets:

Subject to funding, a corps of intervention specialists is located at the ESDs to assist schools and school districts in developing various research-based models and approaches to providing early intervention and support for students.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed. However, section 9 relating to establishing a grant program for coaches, section 10 relating to enriched allocation for reengagement programs, and section 13 relating to intervention specialists at the ESDs, are null and void unless funded in the budget.