Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research | BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee |
HB 1458
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
Title: An act relating to restricting outings from state facilities.
Brief Description: Repealing provisions restricting outings from state facilities.
Sponsors: Representative Green.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/24/14
Staff: Omeara Harrington (786-7136).
Background:
Commitment to State Facilities.
Persons may be committed to state facilities under a variety of circumstances. In addition to civil commitment under the Involuntary Treatment Act, a court may order a person's commitment to a state hospital facility in order to determine whether or not the person is competent to stand trial, to restore the person's competence so that the person may stand trial, or as a result of a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI).
Competency. A person is incompetent to stand trial in a criminal case if, due to a mental disease or defect, he or she lacks the capacity to understand the nature of the proceedings or is unable to assist in his or her own defense. If a person is deemed incompetent to stand trial for a felony or serious misdemeanor, the court will order the defendant to undergo a period competency restoration, lasting from up to 29 days for a misdemeanor charge to up to one year in some felony cases.
NGRI Commitment. A person is found NGRI of a criminal offense if, at the time of the act, they were unable to perceive the nature and quality of the act or unable to tell right from wrong due to a mental disease or defect. A person may be committed following an acquittal on grounds of NGRI if the fact finder determines that the acquitted person presents a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security unless kept under further control by the court or other persons or institutions. The maximum permitted term of commitment following a NGRI acquittal is equal to the maximum possible sentence for any offense charged against the person committed.
Authorized Absences From State Facilities.
A person committed following an acquittal on grounds of NGRI may petition for conditional release or final release by making an application to the Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) or by making a direct petition to the court. Conditional release may be allowed for work release, training, or education purposes. A person may also be granted a furlough, which would allow the person to leave the facility unescorted for a period of time.
Notice to County Prosecutors. Before a person is authorized to leave on furlough or other unescorted leave, the superintendent or professional person in charge of the state facility must provide written notification to the prosecuting attorney of any county to which the person is released and the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the criminal charges against the committed person were dismissed. Notice must be given at least 45 days in advance of the anticipated release and must describe the conditions under which the release is to occur. The prosecuting attorney may seek a temporary restraining order to prevent the release of the person on the grounds that the person is dangerous to self or others.
Notice to Law Enforcement. At least 30 days prior to unescorted leave or furlough, the superintendent of the state institution must provide notice to appropriate law enforcement agencies. Notification must include the places to which the person has permission to go, and the dates and times during which the person will be on leave. If a person to be released, conditionally released, furloughed, or placed in a less restrictive facility has been acquitted on grounds of NGRI for a sex, violent, or felony harassment offense, the superintendent must notify the chief of police of the city and the sheriff of the county in which the person will reside, and to certain other authorized persons who have requested notice in writing.
Additional Restrictions Placed on Leave from State Facilities by SHB 2717 (2010).
Legislation enacted in 2010 placed additional restrictions on persons who are committed to state facilities for purposes of determining or restoring competency, or as the result of an acquittal on grounds of NGRI. A person committed to a state facility for one of these reasons, unless authorized by the court, is not allowed to leave the state institution where he or she has been committed except for:
necessary medical or legal proceedings not available in the facility where he or she is confined;
visits to the bedside of a member of an immediate family member who is seriously ill; or
attendance at the funeral of an immediate family member.
If a person is authorized to leave the facility for one of these reasons, he or she must be escorted by a person approved by the DSHS, and the escort must be in visual or auditory contact at all times with the person on leave unless otherwise authorized by the court.
Prior to any authorized release, the DSHS must give notification to any county or city law enforcement agency having jurisdiction in the location of the person's destination.
Summary of Bill:
The 2010 statute narrowing the circumstances under which a person committed to a state facility for competency evaluation or restoration or following an insanity acquittal may leave the facility without a court order is repealed, removing all additional restrictions instituted pursuant to that legislation.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.