Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Health Care & Wellness Committee

SSB 5601

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Concerning interpretation of state law regarding rebating practices by health care entities.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Senators Becker, Cleveland, Dammeier and Schlicher).

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Exempts from state prohibitions against rebating, the donation of electronic health record technology and other activity permitted by federal rebating laws.

Hearing Date: 3/19/13

Staff: Chris Blake (786-7392).

Background:

Federal Laws Regarding Rebating.

Federal law establishes a crime for an individual to engage in certain types of remuneration arrangements under federal health programs. These provisions prohibit the knowing and willful solicitation or receipt of a remuneration in return for (1) referring an individual to a person for furnishing items or services or (2) purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for goods, facilities, services, or items. Federal law also prohibits knowingly and willfully offering or paying a remuneration to induce a person to (1) refer an individual to a person to furnish items or services or (2) purchase, lease, order, or arrange goods, facilities, services, or items.

There are several exceptions to the remuneration regulations, including:

State Laws Regarding Rebating.

State law prohibits licensed physicians, osteopathic physicians, dentists, and pharmacists from receiving a payment, such as a rebate, refund, or commission, if that payment is received in connection with the referral of patients or the furnishing of health care treatment or diagnosis. The stated intent of the prohibition is to prevent licensed health care providers from receiving compensation for services that they did not perform. The prohibition does not apply to a licensed health provider who charges for the health care services rendered by an employee who is licensed to provide the services.

There have been several court decisions and Attorney General Opinions regarding the application of Washington's rebating prohibitions. The most recent Attorney General Opinion was issued in November 2012. Under this opinion, it was determined that monetary donations by a clinical laboratory to a physician's office to cover costs related to electronic health records could violate state rebating laws. The occurrence of a violation depends upon whether or not the donation is made in connection with patient referrals; the furnishing of health care, diagnosis, treatment, or services; or clinical laboratory services.

Summary of Bill:

The donation of electronic health record technology or any other activity is permissible under state anti-rebating laws when the donation or other activity is allowed by, or does not violate, federal law regarding illegal remunerations under federal health programs. The exceptions do not apply to entities that principally operate as clinical laboratories. The term "electronic health record technology" means items and services in the form of software or information technology and training services used to create, maintain, transmit, or receive electronic health records.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available for original bill.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.