Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Judiciary Committee

ESB 5666

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Title: An act relating to clarifying the law regarding disclosing health care quality improvement, quality assurance, peer review, and credentialing information.

Brief Description: Concerning disclosure of information by health care quality improvement programs, quality assurance programs, and peer review committees.

Sponsors: Senator Dammeier.

Brief Summary of Engrossed Bill

  • Removes language in an exclusive remedy provision of the Health Care Review Act that limits its application to actions taken by a peer review body that are not related to competence or conduct.

  • Revises statutory requirements imposed on quality improvement programs with respect to medical staff privileges sanction procedure and periodic reviews of credentials and competency.

Hearing Date: 3/26/13

Staff: Cece Clynch (786-7195).

Background:

Immunity and Limitation on Remedies.

The federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA) was enacted with the stated purpose of encouraging effective professional peer review to improve the quality of medical care and reduce the cost of medical malpractice lawsuits. The HCQIA provides immunity from damages for actions taken by a professional peer review body related to the competence and conduct of a health care provider. This immunity extends to the professional peer review body, any person acting as a member or staff to the body, any person under contract with the body, and any person who participates with or assists the body with respect to the action. In order to qualify for such immunity, the actions must relate to competence or conduct and have been taken:

The state Health Care Peer Review Act (HCPRA) includes two separate provisions which provide immunity/limit remedies with respect to actions taken by a professional peer review body:

  1. The first incorporates, by reference to the federal law, the provisions of the federal HCQIA that provide immunity from damages for actions taken by a professional peer review body related to the competence and conduct of a health care provider.

  2. The second provides an exclusive remedy for any action taken by a professional peer review body that is found to be based on matters not related to the competence or professional conduct of a health care provider. The remedies available in these actions are limited to injunctive relief and damages are allowed only for lost earnings directly attributable to the action taken by the peer review body and incurred between the date of such action and the date such action is functionally reversed by the peer review body.

Staff Privileges Sanction Procedures and Review of Credentials.

Hospitals and ambulatory surgical facilities must maintain quality improvement programs to improve the quality of health care services and prevent medical malpractice. Program requirements for hospitals and ambulatory surgical facilities (collectively referred to as "facilities") include:

Required Information Regarding Providers.

Prior to granting or renewing privileges or the hiring or association of a physician or practitioner (collectively referred to as "provider"), facilities must request, and the provider must provide, the following information:

During this process, facilities must also request the following information from any facility at which the provider has or had privileges:

Summary of Bill:

Immunity and Limitation on Remedies.

The HCPRA is amended to provide that if the limitation on damages incorporated by reference to the federal law, and found in the first section referenced above, does not apply, then the second provision provides the exclusive remedies in any lawsuit by a health care provider for action taken by a peer review body. Language that limited operation of the second section to only those peer review actions that were not related to the competence or professional conduct of a health care provider is stricken.

Staff Privileges Sanction Procedures and Review of Credentials.

Statutory requirements imposed on hospital quality improvement programs with respect to medical staff privileges sanction procedures and periodic reviews of credentials and competency are revised to specify that such programs:

"Disruptive behavior," for purposes of this review process, is limited to quality improvement review of professional activities and not employment matters that are normally retained in an employee file.

Specific provision is also made to allow an ambulatory surgical facility's quality improvement program to include the establishment of more than one QIC to review different health care services. Otherwise, the requirements with respect to the ambulatory surgical facility's quality improvement programs remain the same.

Required Information Regarding Providers.

Requirements are amended with respect to inquiries that a hospital or ambulatory surgical facility must make prior to granting or renewing privileges or association or hiring of a provider. It is required that inquiry be made regarding current or past affiliations during the prior five years. It is permissive, but not mandatory, to make inquiry going back further. In the event the inquiry stretches beyond the prior five years, the provider must use best efforts to comply with the request.

Rather than mandate inquiry into the reason for the "discontinuation" of every past association, employment, privilege, or practice, the required inquiry is targeted at whether the provider has ever been or is in the process of being denied, revoked, terminated, suspended, or the like for professional activity or has ever relinquished or withdrawn an application in order to avoid any adverse action or preclude an investigation relating to professional competence or conduct.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.