SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5418

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by Senate Committee On:

Governmental Operations, February 21, 2013

Title: An act relating to county property tax levies.

Brief Description: Concerning county property tax levies.

Sponsors: Senators Bailey, McAuliffe, Shin, Chase and Harper.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Governmental Operations: 2/11/13, 2/21/13 [DPS-WM].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5418 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.

Signed by Senators Roach, Chair; Benton, Vice Chair; Hasegawa, Ranking Member; Braun, Conway, Fraser and Rivers.

Staff: Sam Thompson (786-7413)

Background: Counties must annually allocate portions of their general property tax levy to fund county mental health, developmental disability, and veterans' assistance programs.

If the county general property tax levy is reduced to conform to a 1 percent limit on annual increases, the portions of the levy allocated to fund the programs may be proportionately reduced. Differing interpretations have arisen regarding county authority to adjust funding for the programs if a county opts to forego increasing its general property tax levy up to the 1 percent limit on annual increases.

Summary of Bill (Recommended Substitute): County authority to annually adjust funding for county mental health, developmental disability, and veterans' assistance programs is clarified.

If the general county property tax levy is:

For purposes of this bill, refund levies are not included within the general county property tax levy.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): The recommended substitute clarifies that: refund levies are not included in the definition of certified levy (the general county property tax levy); if the certified levy is reduced, funding for the programs may be reduced by no more than same percentage as the certified levy is reduced.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: PRO: This legislation, Snohomish County's top priority this session, clarifies current law to resolve differing interpretations of county authority to adjust program funding when a county does does not increase its annual levy up to the 1 percent limit. If this bill is not enacted, Snohomish County will have to cut $1.3 million in funding for law enforcement and other priorities to augment funding for these programs. The bill seeks to maintain current practice, and provides necessary equity. Counties that have not annually raised taxes up to the permissible limit should not be penalized.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Bailey, prime sponsor; Briahna Taylor, Dave Gossett, Snohomish County.