BILL REQ. #: S-4062.1
State of Washington | 63rd Legislature | 2014 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/30/14. Referred to Committee on Natural Resources & Parks.
AN ACT Relating to fish barrier removals; amending RCW 77.55.181, 19.27.490, 35.21.404, 35.63.230, 35A.21.290, 35A.63.250, 36.70.982, 36.70.992, 36.70A.460, and 43.21C.0382; adding a new section to chapter 77.95 RCW; creating a new section; and providing an expiration date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 77.55.181 and 2010 c 210 s 29 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) In order to receive the permit review and approval process
created in this section, a fish habitat enhancement project must meet
the criteria under (((a) and (b) of)) this ((subsection:)) section and must be a
project to accomplish one or more of the following tasks:
(a) A fish habitat enhancement project
(i) Elimination of human-made fish passage barriers, including
culvert repair and replacement;
(ii) Restoration of an eroded or unstable streambank employing the
principle of bioengineering, including limited use of rock as a
stabilization only at the toe of the bank, and with primary emphasis on
using native vegetation to control the erosive forces of flowing water;
or
(iii) Placement of woody debris or other instream structures that
benefit naturally reproducing fish stocks.
(b) The department shall develop size or scale threshold tests to
determine if projects accomplishing any of these tasks should be
evaluated under the process created in this section or under other
project review and approval processes. A project proposal shall not be
reviewed under the process created in this section if the department
determines that the scale of the project raises concerns regarding
public health and safety((; and)).
(((b))) (c) A fish habitat enhancement project must be approved in
one of the following ways in order to receive the permit review and
approval process created in this section:
(i) By the department pursuant to chapter 77.95 or 77.100 RCW;
(ii) By the sponsor of a watershed restoration plan as provided in
chapter 89.08 RCW;
(iii) By the department as a department-sponsored fish habitat
enhancement or restoration project;
(iv) Through the review and approval process for the jobs for the
environment program;
(v) Through the review and approval process for conservation
district-sponsored projects, where the project complies with design
standards established by the conservation commission through
interagency agreement with the United States fish and wildlife service
and the natural resource conservation service;
(vi) Through a formal grant program established by the legislature
or the department for fish habitat enhancement or restoration; ((and))
(vii) Through the department of transportation's environmental
retrofit program as a stand-alone fish passage barrier correction
project;
(viii) Through a local, state, or federally approved fish barrier
removal grant program designed to assist local governments in
implementing stand-alone fish passage barrier corrections; and
(ix) Through other formal review and approval processes established
by the legislature.
(2) Fish habitat enhancement projects meeting the criteria of
subsection (1) of this section are expected to result in beneficial
impacts to the environment. Decisions pertaining to fish habitat
enhancement projects meeting the criteria of subsection (1) of this
section and being reviewed and approved according to the provisions of
this section are not subject to the requirements of RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c).
(3)(a) A permit is required for projects that meet the criteria of
subsection (1) of this section and are being reviewed and approved
under this section. An applicant shall use a joint aquatic resource
permit application form developed by the office of regulatory
assistance to apply for approval under this chapter. On the same day,
the applicant shall provide copies of the completed application form to
the department and to each appropriate local government.
(b) Local governments shall accept the application as notice of the
proposed project. The department shall provide a fifteen-day comment
period during which it will receive comments regarding environmental
impacts.
(c) Within forty-five days, the department shall either issue a
permit, with or without conditions, deny approval, or make a
determination that the review and approval process created by this
section is not appropriate for the proposed project. The department
shall base this determination on identification during the comment
period of adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated by the conditioning
of a permit.
(d) If the department determines that the review and approval
process created by this section is not appropriate for the proposed
project, the department shall notify the applicant and the appropriate
local governments of its determination. The applicant may reapply for
approval of the project under other review and approval processes.
(((b))) (e) Any person aggrieved by the approval, denial,
conditioning, or modification of a permit under this section may appeal
the decision as provided in RCW 77.55.021(((4))) (8).
(4) No local government may require permits or charge fees for fish
habitat enhancement projects that meet the criteria of subsection (1)
of this section and that are reviewed and approved according to the
provisions of this section.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 77.95 RCW
to read as follows:
The department may contract with cities and counties to assist in
the identification and removal of impediments to fish passage.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 (1) The departments of transportation and
fish and wildlife must initiate contact with the United States army
corps of engineers, the national oceanic and atmospheric
administration, and, if necessary, the United States fish and wildlife
service to explore the feasibility of bundling multiple transportation-related fish barrier removal projects under any available nationwide
permits for the purpose of achieving streamlined federal permitting
with a reduced processing time.
(2) The departments of transportation and fish and wildlife must
report back to the legislature, consistent with RCW 43.01.036, by
October 31, 2016, summarizing the information gathered and any progress
made towards using the bundling concept to streamline permitting for
transportation-related fish barrier removal projects.
(3) This section expires June 30, 2017.
Sec. 4 RCW 19.27.490 and 2003 c 39 s 11 are each amended to read
as follows:
A fish habitat enhancement project meeting the criteria of RCW
((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 is not subject to grading permits,
inspections, or fees and shall be reviewed according to the provisions
of RCW ((77.55.290)) 77.55.181.
Sec. 5 RCW 35.21.404 and 2003 c 39 s 14 are each amended to read
as follows:
A city or town is not liable for adverse impacts resulting from a
fish enhancement project that meets the criteria of RCW ((77.55.290))
77.55.181 and has been permitted by the department of fish and
wildlife.
Sec. 6 RCW 35.63.230 and 2003 c 39 s 15 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A permit required under this chapter for a watershed
restoration project as defined in RCW 89.08.460 shall be processed in
compliance with RCW 89.08.450 through 89.08.510.
(2) A fish habitat enhancement project meeting the criteria of RCW
((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 shall be reviewed and approved according to
the provisions of RCW ((77.55.290)) 77.55.181.
Sec. 7 RCW 35A.21.290 and 2003 c 39 s 16 are each amended to read
as follows:
A code city is not liable for adverse impacts resulting from a fish
enhancement project that meets the criteria of RCW ((77.55.290))
77.55.181 and has been permitted by the department of fish and
wildlife.
Sec. 8 RCW 35A.63.250 and 2003 c 39 s 17 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A permit required under this chapter for a watershed
restoration project as defined in RCW 89.08.460 shall be processed in
compliance with RCW 89.08.450 through 89.08.510.
(2) A fish habitat enhancement project meeting the criteria of RCW
((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 shall be reviewed and approved according to
the provisions of RCW ((77.55.290)) 77.55.181.
Sec. 9 RCW 36.70.982 and 2003 c 39 s 19 are each amended to read
as follows:
A county is not liable for adverse impacts resulting from a fish
enhancement project that meets the criteria of RCW ((77.55.290))
77.55.181 and has been permitted by the department of fish and
wildlife.
Sec. 10 RCW 36.70.992 and 2003 c 39 s 20 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A permit required under this chapter for a watershed
restoration project as defined in RCW 89.08.460 shall be processed in
compliance with RCW 89.08.450 through 89.08.510.
(2) A fish habitat enhancement project meeting the criteria of RCW
((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 shall be reviewed and approved according to
the provisions of RCW ((77.55.290)) 77.55.181.
Sec. 11 RCW 36.70A.460 and 2003 c 39 s 21 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) A permit required under this chapter for a watershed
restoration project as defined in RCW 89.08.460 shall be processed in
compliance with RCW 89.08.450 through 89.08.510.
(2) A fish habitat enhancement project meeting the criteria of RCW
((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 shall be reviewed and approved according to
the provisions of RCW ((77.55.290)) 77.55.181.
Sec. 12 RCW 43.21C.0382 and 2003 c 39 s 23 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Decisions pertaining to watershed restoration projects as
defined in RCW 89.08.460 are not subject to the requirements of RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c).
(2) Decisions pertaining to fish habitat enhancement projects
meeting the criteria of RCW ((77.55.290(1))) 77.55.181 and being
reviewed and approved according to the provisions of RCW ((77.55.290))
77.55.181 are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).