Passed by the Senate March 10, 2014 YEAS 49   ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House March 6, 2014 YEAS 86   ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Hunter G. Goodman, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6242 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 63rd Legislature | 2014 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/07/14.
AN ACT Relating to waivers from the one hundred eighty-day school year requirement; amending RCW 28A.305.141; and providing an expiration date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 28A.305.141 and 2009 c 543 s 2 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) In addition to waivers authorized under RCW 28A.305.140 and
28A.655.180, the state board of education may grant waivers from the
requirement for a one hundred eighty-day school year under RCW
28A.150.220 ((and 28A.150.250)) to school districts that propose to
operate one or more schools on a flexible calendar for purposes of
economy and efficiency as provided in this section. The requirement
under RCW 28A.150.220 that school districts offer ((an annual average
instructional hour offering of at least one thousand)) minimum
instructional hours shall not be waived.
(2) A school district seeking a waiver under this section must
submit an application that includes:
(a) A proposed calendar for the school day and school year that
demonstrates how the instructional hour requirement will be maintained;
(b) An explanation and estimate of the economies and efficiencies
to be gained from compressing the instructional hours into fewer than
one hundred eighty days;
(c) An explanation of how monetary savings from the proposal will
be redirected to support student learning;
(d) A summary of comments received at one or more public hearings
on the proposal and how concerns will be addressed;
(e) An explanation of the impact on students who rely upon free and
reduced-price school child nutrition services and the impact on the
ability of the child nutrition program to operate an economically
independent program;
(f) An explanation of the impact on employees in education support
positions and the ability to recruit and retain employees in education
support positions;
(g) An explanation of the impact on students whose parents work
during the missed school day; and
(h) Other information that the state board of education may request
to assure that the proposed flexible calendar will not adversely affect
student learning.
(3) The state board of education shall adopt criteria to evaluate
waiver requests. No more than five districts may be granted waivers.
Waivers may be granted for up to three years. After each school year,
the state board of education shall analyze empirical evidence to
determine whether the reduction is affecting student learning. If the
state board of education determines that student learning is adversely
affected, the school district shall discontinue the flexible calendar
as soon as possible but not later than the beginning of the next school
year after the determination has been made. All waivers expire August
31, ((2014)) 2017.
(a) Two of the five waivers granted under this subsection shall be
granted to school districts with student populations of less than one
hundred fifty students.
(b) Three of the five waivers granted under this subsection shall
be granted to school districts with student populations of between one
hundred fifty-one and five hundred students.
(4) ((The state board of education shall examine the waivers
granted under this section and make a recommendation to the education
committees of the legislature by December 15, 2013, regarding whether
the waiver program should be continued, modified, or allowed to
terminate. This recommendation should focus on whether the program
resulted in improved student learning as demonstrated by empirical
evidence. Such evidence includes, but is not limited to: Improved
scores on the Washington assessment of student learning, results of the
dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, student grades, and
attendance.)) This section expires August 31, ((
(5)2014)) 2017.