Passed by the House February 12, 2014 Yeas 97   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate February 26, 2014 Yeas 49   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2195 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. BARBARA BAKER ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
Approved March 12, 2014, 2:26 p.m. JAY INSLEE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | March 12, 2014 Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 63rd Legislature | 2014 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 01/23/14.
AN ACT Relating to involuntary medication for maintaining the level of restoration in jail; amending RCW 10.77.092 and 10.77.065; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature finds that there is
currently no clear language authorizing courts to order involuntary
medications in order to maintain the level of competency restoration in
the jail following a competency restoration period and subsequent
discharge from a state hospital. This act specifies that maintenance
of competency in jail is a purpose for which the court may order a
criminal defendant facing serious charges to be involuntarily
medicated.
Sec. 2 RCW 10.77.092 and 2008 c 213 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) For purposes of determining whether a court may authorize
involuntary medication for the purpose of competency restoration
pursuant to RCW 10.77.084 and for maintaining the level of restoration
in the jail following the restoration period, a pending charge
involving any one or more of the following crimes is a serious offense
per se in the context of competency restoration:
(a) Any violent offense, sex offense, serious traffic offense, and
most serious offense, as those terms are defined in RCW 9.94A.030;
(b) Any offense, except nonfelony counterfeiting offenses, included
in crimes against persons in RCW 9.94A.411;
(c) Any offense contained in chapter 9.41 RCW (firearms and
dangerous weapons);
(d) Any offense listed as domestic violence in RCW 10.99.020;
(e) Any offense listed as a harassment offense in chapter 9A.46
RCW;
(f) Any violation of chapter 69.50 RCW that is a class B felony; or
(g) Any city or county ordinance or statute that is equivalent to
an offense referenced in this subsection.
(2)(a) In a particular case, a court may determine that a pending
charge not otherwise defined as serious by state or federal law or by
a city or county ordinance is, nevertheless, a serious offense within
the context of competency restoration treatment when the conduct in the
charged offense falls within the standards established in (b) of this
subsection.
(b) To determine that the particular case is a serious offense
within the context of competency restoration, the court must consider
the following factors and determine that one or more of the following
factors creates a situation in which the offense is serious:
(i) The charge includes an allegation that the defendant actually
inflicted bodily or emotional harm on another person or that the
defendant created a reasonable apprehension of bodily or emotional harm
to another;
(ii) The extent of the impact of the alleged offense on the basic
human need for security of the citizens within the jurisdiction;
(iii) The number and nature of related charges pending against the
defendant;
(iv) The length of potential confinement if the defendant is
convicted; and
(v) The number of potential and actual victims or persons impacted
by the defendant's alleged acts.
Sec. 3 RCW 10.77.065 and 2013
c 214 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a)(i) The expert conducting the evaluation shall provide his or
her report and recommendation to the court in which the criminal
proceeding is pending. For a competency evaluation of a defendant who
is released from custody, if the evaluation cannot be completed within
twenty-one days due to a lack of cooperation by the defendant, the
evaluator shall notify the court that he or she is unable to complete
the evaluation because of such lack of cooperation.
(ii) A copy of the report and recommendation shall be provided to
the designated mental health professional, the prosecuting attorney,
the defense attorney, and the professional person at the local
correctional facility where the defendant is being held, or if there is
no professional person, to the person designated under (a)(iv) of this
subsection. Upon request, the evaluator shall also provide copies of
any source documents relevant to the evaluation to the designated
mental health professional.
(iii) Any facility providing inpatient services related to
competency shall discharge the defendant as soon as the facility
determines that the defendant is competent to stand trial. Discharge
shall not be postponed during the writing and distribution of the
evaluation report. Distribution of an evaluation report by a facility
providing inpatient services shall ordinarily be accomplished within
two working days or less following the final evaluation of the
defendant. If the defendant is discharged to the custody of a local
correctional facility, the local correctional facility must continue
the medication regimen prescribed by the facility, when clinically
appropriate, unless the defendant refuses to cooperate with medication
and an involuntary medication order by the court has not been entered.
(iv) If there is no professional person at the local correctional
facility, the local correctional facility shall designate a
professional person as defined in RCW 71.05.020 or, in cooperation with
the regional support network, a professional person at the regional
support network to receive the report and recommendation.
(v) Upon commencement of a defendant's evaluation in the local
correctional facility, the local correctional facility must notify the
evaluator of the name of the professional person, or person designated
under (a)(iv) of this subsection, to receive the report and
recommendation.
(b) If the evaluator concludes, under RCW 10.77.060(3)(f), the
person should be evaluated by a designated mental health professional
under chapter 71.05 RCW, the court shall order such evaluation be
conducted prior to release from confinement when the person is
acquitted or convicted and sentenced to confinement for twenty-four
months or less, or when charges are dismissed pursuant to a finding of
incompetent to stand trial.
(2) The designated mental health professional shall provide written
notification within twenty-four hours of the results of the
determination whether to commence proceedings under chapter 71.05 RCW.
The notification shall be provided to the persons identified in
subsection (1)(a) of this section.
(3) The prosecuting attorney shall provide a copy of the results of
any proceedings commenced by the designated mental health professional
under subsection (2) of this section to the secretary.
(4) A facility conducting a civil commitment evaluation under RCW
10.77.086(4) or 10.77.088(1)(b)(ii) that makes a determination to
release the person instead of filing a civil commitment petition must
provide written notice to the prosecutor and defense attorney at least
twenty-four hours prior to release. The notice may be given by
electronic mail, facsimile, or other means reasonably likely to
communicate the information immediately.
(5) The fact of admission and all information and records compiled,
obtained, or maintained in the course of providing services under this
chapter may also be disclosed to the courts solely to prevent the entry
of any evaluation or treatment order that is inconsistent with any
order entered under chapter 71.05 RCW.