Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Judiciary Committee

HB 1040

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Title: An act relating to subversive activities.

Brief Description: Removing provisions relating to subversive activities.

Sponsors: Representatives Fitzgibbon, Santos, Ormsby and Farrell.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Repeals chapter 9.81 RCW, regarding subversive activities, in its entirety.

Hearing Date: 1/14/15

Staff: Brent Campbell (786-7152).

Background:

Subversive Activities.

The Washington Subversive Activities Act (Act) was first enacted in 1951. The Act defines a "subversive person" as "any person who commits, attempts to commit, or aids in the commission, or advocates, abets, advises or teaches by any means any person to commit, attempt to commit, or aid in the commission of any act intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of, the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or any political subdivision of either of them by revolution, force, or violence; or who with knowledge that the organization is an organization as described in subsections (2) and (3) hereof, becomes or remains a member of a subversive organization or a foreign subversive organization."

A "subversive organization" is defined as "any organization which engages in or advocates, abets, advises, or teaches, or a purpose of which is to engage in or advocate, abet, advise, or teach activities intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of, the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or of any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force or violence."

The Act provides that:

In a 1964 opinion, Baggett v. Bullitt, the Supreme Court of the United States (Court) struck down provisions of the Act as being unconstitutionally vague. In Baggett, the Court was asked to determine whether the oath for public employment required by the Act was unconstitutional. The Court held that the oath was unconstitutional and that the definitions for "subversive person" and "subversive organization" were unduly vague, uncertain, and broad.

Summary of Bill:

Chapter 9.81 RCW is repealed in its entirety.

RCW 35.42.020, pertaining to the qualification, removal, code of ethics, and duties of public officers, is amended to remove reference to chapter 9.81 RCW.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.